IDW Media Holdings, Inc. (IDW) CEO Ezra Rosensaft on Q2 2022 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

IDW Media Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:IDW) Q2 2022 Earnings Conference Call June 14, 2022 5:00 PM ET

Company Participants

John Nesbett – IMS Investor Relations

Ezra Rosensaft – Chief Executive Officer

Brooke Feinstein – Chief Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Edward Reilly – EF Hutton

Operator

Good evening, and welcome to the IDW Media Holdings Second Quarter Fiscal 2022 Earnings Call. During management’s prepared remarks, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After the prepared remarks, you are invited to participate in the Q&A. [Operator Instructions]

I will now turn the call over to John Nesbett of IMS Investor Relations.

John Nesbett

Thank you, operator. Good day, and welcome to the IDW Media Holdings investor conference call for the second quarter and six months ended April 30, 2022. With me on the call are Ezra Rosensaft, Chief Executive Officer; and Brooke Feinstein, Chief Financial Officer.

I would like to begin the call by reading safe harbor statement. On this call all statements that are not purely historical facts, including, but not limited to those in which we use the words believe, anticipate, expect, plan, intend, estimate, target and similar expressions are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. While these forward-looking statements represent our current judgment of what may happen in the future, actual results may differ materially from the results expressed or implied by these statements due to numerous important factors, including, but not limited to, those described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2021 under the heading risk factors and management discussion analysis of financial condition and results of operations and subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. We are under no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update the forward-looking statements on this call whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Now I will turn the call over to Ezra Rosensaft. Please go ahead, Ezra.

Ezra Rosensaft

Thank you, John, and thank you to everyone on the call for joining us. My remarks today will review our strategy and execution during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022, which closed April 30. At the conclusion of my remarks, Brooke Feinstein, our CFO, will provide details around our financial results and then will be happy to take your questions.

This quarter came in where we expected. Strategically, we made tremendous progress as we continue to execute on IDW’s new enhanced model of expanding our IP, intellectual property portfolio and [through utilizing] de-risked entertainment financing models and our asset-light balance sheet to drive results. When you look at the quarter, the elephant in the room is no revenue on the entertainment side. Importantly, though, we did not expect any in the quarter. As we scale the new IDW model, revenue on entertainment side of the business will continue to fluctuate. We have already seen this occur in the first six months of fiscal 2022, very strong revenue in Q1, and no meaningful revenue in Q2. In Q3 and Q4, we expect to see entertainment revenue from Surfside Girls and Locke & Key Season 3.

So we don’t currently evaluate the progress we are making on the entertainment side of our business on a quarter-to-quarter basis. Rather, we look at it on a trailing 12-month basis, particularly as the business scales. Taken from that perspective, our entertainment business is performing well and is a tremendous runway for potential growth as we continue to create more and more original content.

To that end, we remain laser focused on expanding our library of original content by attracting and partnering with talented and visionary creators. The authors and creators we work with are amongst the most talented and innovative in the industry, but don’t just take my word for it.

Recently, IDW original titles received 12 nominations from the Will Eisner Comic Industry Awards, including best graphic novel for Ballad for Sophie, best publication for early readers for Chibi-Usagi: Attack of the Heebie Chibis and best U.S. edition of international material for The Shadow of Van to name a few. We will continue to leverage our relationships with renowned authors and creators, as well as our own reputation as an innovative independent publisher of comics and graphic novels to cultivate our pipeline, which we believe will transition very nicely across our platform.

Along those lines of leveraging our relationships, during the second quarter, we announced a strong slate of nine new graphic novels and comic books scheduled to be published in July, 2022. Currently, we have over 100 original titles in our library with 40 new titles at various stages in development pipeline and the goal is to add 40 quality original titles each year. I can stress enough the importance of our original IP as a key economic driver to the business and also as a creative engine providing us access to new genres and the audiences they attract. Currently, as we build on our existing library of horror, sci-fi and thriller titles, we are also targeting large audiences through genres that are new to us, including Young Adult, Middle Grade, Tweens, Drama and Comedy.

As I already mentioned after recording strong first quarter fiscal 2022 revenues in the Entertainment segment related to our delivery of Locke & Key Season 2, during the second quarter, we recognized no measurable revenue from IDW Entertainment. As we further expand our roster of greenlit entertainment projects, we expect to deliver a more consistent revenue cadence from our Entertainment segment.

Looking ahead, during the second half of fiscal 2022, we expect to recognize revenue from the delivery of both Season 3 of Locke & Key and Season 1 of Surfside Girls, appearing on Netflix and Apple, respectively. So a lot to look forward to as we move through the balance of this fiscal year. We are energized by the progress we are making and the potential we see for the concurrent co-development of content for both publishing and entertainment, and we are exploring opportunities to work with international animation partners with the goal of converting kid-focused IP into media properties. Likewise, we are exploring expansion into film and narrative podcast opportunity, which can be promising vehicles for our original content.

We know from experience that when we can leverage our original titles on the entertainment side of our business will benefit from increased visibility as this exposure has been proven to drive increased publishing sales, creating a virtuous cycle between our Publishing and Entertainment segments. This is an exciting and busy time for our company.

As we move through the remainder of fiscal 2022, we believe we are well positioned to capitalize on our refocused strategy, the strength of our content pipeline and the flexibility of our balance sheet, which provide a solid foundation from which we can accelerate our growth.

I will now turn the call over to our CFO, Brooke Feinstein to go over our financials for the second quarter and first six months of 2022. Go ahead, Brooke.

Brooke Feinstein

Thank you, Ezra. My remarks today will focus on the second quarter and first six months of our fiscal year 2022. The three and six months ended April 30, 2022. Except where I indicate otherwise, I’ll be comparing the second quarter of fiscal 2022 results to the second quarter of fiscal 2021. And I’ll be comparing the first six months of fiscal 2022 to the first six months of fiscal 2021.

IDW Media Holdings second quarter consolidated revenue decreased 40% to $6.1 million from $10.1 million a year-ago. Publishing revenue improved slightly to $6.1 million in the second quarter compared to $6 million in the same prior year period, primarily due to an increase in direct-to-consumer revenue of 384,000 related to the Sonic The Hedgehog 30th Anniversary as well as increases in direct and non-direct market publishing revenue driven by strong sales of the title They Called Us Enemy.

Entertainment generated no measurable revenue compared to $4.2 million primarily related to the delivery of episodes from Wynonna Earp for 820,000 and tax credits for V Wars and October Faction totaling $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2021 as compared to no delivered episodes in the second quarter of 2020. For the first six months of fiscal 2020 consolidated revenue decreased to $17.9 million from $18.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021.

Publishing revenue for the first six months of fiscal 2022 increased to $13.6 million from $11.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in games revenue of $2 million driven by the fulfillment of the direct-to-consumer games campaign for Batman Adventures and increases in both other publishing revenue and non-direct market publishing revenue.

Entertainment revenue for the first six months of 2022 decreased to $4.3 million from $6.9 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021. Revenues in the first six months of 2020 included full delivery of Locke & Key Season 2 for $4.2 million and the French-Canadian license received for V Wars.

Our consolidated loss from operations was $2.2 million in the second quarter compared to income from operations of $433,000 in the prior year period, primarily driven by an increase in operating losses on the entertainment side of our business of $2.9 million. IDW Publishing’s loss from operations was 267,000 compared to a loss from operations of 509,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2021.

IDW Entertainment second quarter loss from operations was $1.7 million compared to an income from operations of $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2021. Consolidated loss from operations for the first six months of fiscal 2022 was $260,000 compared to a loss from operations of $4.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021. IDW Publishing’s income from operations was $246,000 in the first six months of 2022 compared to an operating loss of $883,000 in the same prior year period.

IDW Entertainment’s income from operations was $294,000 in the first six months of 2022 compared to a loss from operations of $3.3 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021. Net loss in the second quarter was $2.3 million or a loss of $0.17 per diluted share compared to net income of $2.5 million or $0.25 per diluted share in the year-ago quarter. Net loss for the first six months of fiscal 2022 was $264,000 compared to a net loss of $3.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021.

Turning now to our balance sheet. At April 30, we held $13.7 million in cash and cash equivalent and had no debt. Working capital, current assets, less current liabilities, totaled $19 million. As Ezra mentioned earlier, this quarter’s revenues reflect how our revenue recognition continues to vary quarter-to-quarter, particularly related to the timing of delivery of shows and films in our Entertainment segment.

As we continue to grow a roster of entertainment projects, we expect revenue generation to become more consistent and predictable over time. Our balance sheet remains strong with a solid cash position and no debt, providing the flexibility to continue building our IP library to expand our projects on both the Publishing and Entertainment sides of our business. As we continue to shift our focus to prioritize original content, we believe that we are well positioned to grow our IP library and feed our Entertainment segment to generate consistent high-margin revenues going forward.

That concludes my remarks. Now Ezra and I will be happy to take your questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from [Todd Higgins] with Washington Street Partners. Please proceed with your question.

Unidentified Analyst

Hey guys. Thanks for taking my question. So can you give any more color around how we should be thinking about the pipeline on entertainment and how we should think about it in the back half of the year?

Ezra Rosensaft

Hi, Todd. Thanks for asking the question. It’s Ezra. Excellent question. So we have our publishing pipeline that feeds our development slate, and we have announced that has been seen Locke & Key and Surfside Girls will be airing. Locke & Key has been announced air date, Apple has not yet announced a date for Surfside Girls. We continue to work on quite a bit in the publishing space and also on the development slate of which we can’t announce because those deals have not yet been publicly announced by the buyers. So while there’s a lot in motion, we don’t give future guidance and discuss publicly what we cannot publicly talk about. Other than I would recommend everyone to review our investor presentation on the website.

Unidentified Analyst

Got it. All right. Thanks. That’s helpful. Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from [Mo Sheldon] with RMR Capital Partners. Please proceed with your question.

Unidentified Analyst

Hey, Ezra. I actually had the same question a gentleman before me, just more on the pipeline and what you guys have in-store. So just going off of that, in terms of the revenue is expected for the rest of the year. So we have Season 3 for Locke & Key, and then Surfside Girls that’s supposed to be coming in this year as well.

Ezra Rosensaft

Correct. We anticipate recognizing revenue for Season 3 of Locke & Key and Surfside Girls. No other shows have been announced and what everyone knows, right, takes time to go from start adoption to delivery, typical in the industry is 12 month-ish. While some things are in discussion and so on and so forth, I’m not at liberty to disclose what is in motion at the moment. So there would be nothing else anticipated for entertainment just to squarely answer your question. Locke & Key Season 3, yes; Surfside Girls Season 1, yes.

Unidentified Analyst

Got it. Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from Edward Reilly with EF Hutton. Please proceed with your question.

Edward Reilly

Hey, Ezra. Yes, just to piggyback on the previous two questions. Just was wondering if you’re expecting delivery of the shows to be more or less in line with the release dates this year?

Ezra Rosensaft

Excellent question, Eddie. So as we know in entertainment accounting, and I’ll actually turn this over to Brooke, delivery and air dates don’t line up in how accounting is recognized on our books. Let me turn it over to Brooke to answer that a little more fully. And especially, I would just add that the air date for Apple and Surfside Girls has not been announced where if Locke & Key has been. Brooke, go ahead.

Brooke Feinstein

Sure. So far with Locke & Key, we actually have – it’s like full delivery of everything, which we’re going to try and ensure is going to be the same time as when it is being aired, so that one, yes. Now in regards to Surfside Girls, we have different streams of revenue, so there’s episodic fees which would be on each delivery of each episode. And then the remainder – I know there’s backend possibly, but the remainder would be on full delivery of everything together, which is based off the final budget. So that one’s a little bit more spread over time.

Edward Reilly

Okay. Got you. So just to reiterate that for Surfside Girls, basically, you receive delivery. You can recognize revenue per episode and then talk more about lump sum delivery at the end of the season?

Brooke Feinstein

Yes. And then a possible backend at a later time, yes.

Edward Reilly

Okay. Great. That’s perfect. And then I know I asked a similar question last quarter. But gross margin, again, it looks to be higher than it was last year. I know last quarter, that was mostly attributable to the Batman game. I was wondering what you would attribute the increased gross margin through this quarter?

Brooke Feinstein

Yes. So in the prior year, we also had a write-off of games obsolescence of about 300,000 or so. So that also assisted with the gross margin increases here.

Edward Reilly

Okay. Great. And then just looking at some general news, I wanted to try and kind of get a feel for the demand environment for content. Netflix had slashed their budget, I believe. Just wanted you guys to comment on the general environment for content right now versus maybe a year or so ago?

Ezra Rosensaft

Right. Great question. So we always keep an eye certainly on our business, but also on the overall media landscape. That’s true for looking at the – we’re really big players and what’s happening in terms of cable and broadband and so on and so forth, but down to really what matters to us, which is your question of the buyers of content, whether you’re talking about the Disneys of the world or Comcast or we all know the major players. And there’s about eight to 10 really major buyers that we speak with on a regular basis, plus smaller players, they could be international, they could be niche and so on.

I will say the demand is there, every buyer we speak with and that’s on a regular basis, we have meetings. They don’t have enough supply and it always comes down to a comment made by one of them. They need something for everyone. So while not everyone is going to watch Squid Game Season 2, I’m sure everyone has seen articles about it because it’s coming out soon. There will be some people and some people who won’t and that’s okay, right? Netflix says, that’s okay. They don’t build their business that way, but they’ll also have children’s content, and so that’ll be served up in the algorithm and so on.

And, yes, while Netflix is the largest, we also need to pay attention to the other players and they are meaningful buyers. Every one of the meaningful buyers are spending billions and Disney is the largest because they spend a lot in-house, but even they are supplementing their content with external from pure plays, such as IDW, which I would say there aren’t that many. So I feel we are in a very strong position given our publishing pipeline, the renewed focus on originals and our push on the development slate across everything that we have and all media rights. So the demand is there and we hope to be successful in our sales to the buyers who have that voracious appetite and the money there. So we got to make good on selling great shows. That’s where we’re after.

Edward Reilly

Great. Thanks, Ezra. Appreciate it.

Ezra Rosensaft

Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from [John Lee, Private Investor]. Please proceed with your question.

Unidentified Analyst

Thanks for taking my question. So I have two questions. So the first one is, the publishing business has become more focused by discontinuing the game and tourist business. What should the operating margins investors should expect over the long-term with the original titles strategy?

Ezra Rosensaft

Thanks, John. So very interesting question. And we would need to pull apart the two segments to fully understand that. And that goes a little bit into future guidance that I don’t want to talk about. So there’s the publishing side of the business, which is a little more predictable and you can see the gross margins over time and they do fluctuate and we’re improving them and so on and the net margin as well, which we are improving. So gross margins are in the 40%-ish and net margins are 10% plus.

On the entertainment side, if you look historically, it’s all publicly available, the gross margin was based on a very high revenue stream because the company had a very different financing model and we’ve spoken about this and is done in an investor presentation as well, where the company would take a loan and therefore recognized full revenue. But it also meant that the gross margin differed quite a bit from what we see today and what we spoke to and Brooke alluded to, we recognize the fee that we are receiving from Netflix or from Apple TV, just for our content and not for – the production fee for our content and not the overall sale to Netflix.

So a simple example is if some company sold the show for $50 million, you would see giant costs, which by the way would hit your balance sheet. So you would see giant costs of, let’s make it up $40 million. That’s a very different gross margin than if you recognize the fees, as you can once more publicly see what we received for Locke & Key of $4 million to $5 million. And the gross margin is something to tune of 80% because all we’re paying is a production service company fee.

So that’s the de-risked business model. And it goes back to looking at the balance sheet carefully where the company no longer has debt, no longer takes out loans. We have cash, we’re debt free and everything we do minimizes our risk because we’re not taking that out. And that impacts the margins. I know it’s a long answer to your question. And also, we have gotten away from games, which is a piece of it. So the originals, it drives margin on publishing, and you have to think about that in terms of, they may not be right away great revenue and margin, Locke & Key is an excellent example.

As you would imagine, most books, think of Twilight. You’re not sure about sales initially, but eventually it ramps up and there’s a tremendous gross margin because it does very well and you’re making pure profit. When it comes to originals on the entertainment side, that is a very different model and we don’t do deals unless it’s going to be profitable. The past is the past, and you can look at the public filings on that. But going forward, all of the entertainment revenue and therefore, the gross margin, therefore the EBITDA margin will be based on profit only. There’s not going to be a scenario where we would do plenty.

Unidentified Analyst

Okay. Great. And my second question is kind of like a general broad question. So does IDW earn revenue when a published top shelf series becomes a show?

Ezra Rosensaft

I’m sorry, could you repeat it one more time? And hear whole question.

Unidentified Analyst

Oh, sorry. So does IDW earn revenue when like a published top shelf series becomes a show? So for example, like Essex County?

Ezra Rosensaft

So some of the historical deals and shows did or didn’t have all media rights. Let me push it to Brooke for a moment because a lot of that goes with traffic. Certainly, going forward, I would say generally yes, without getting into individual shows, but let me push it to Brooke to talk about some of the historical ones because it’s a great question.

Brooke Feinstein

Right. So for this one example, I know that the rights actually were somewhat lost. We will get some partial fees from it, but as long as we hold the rights, which, now structuring all the contracts for all the new originals, we are going to be doing that and renewing options and stuff. That would be the case, but the intercompany revenue from that would be eliminated. They wouldn’t go to publishing just with entertainment, right.

Ezra Rosensaft

And John, just to reiterate what Brooke said to your question, which is a very important one strikes at the heart of the business. For everything that we do, unless it’s like exceptional author or director, we go after all media rights, right, that’s the strategy. We have our publishing pipeline that feeds the development slate. So Publishing segment feeds entertainment, all media rights, and while we’re talking a lot about books and television, we also allude to other platforms certainly in the presentation, podcast or all the platforms that ever on this call is familiar with, which are new untapped revenue sources that we hope to go after in the near future.

Unidentified Analyst

Okay. Thanks.

Operator

The next question comes from [Devin Sue] with North First Capital. Please proceed with your question.

Unidentified Analyst

Okay. Thanks for taking my questions. I just had two quick ones, from a cash flow burn perspective, just back in the envelope with publishing maybe minus two each quarter, Locke & Key and then Surfside Girls. Is it right to kind of assume max, maybe $2 million of cash burn for the rest of the year?

Ezra Rosensaft

That’s a great question. So the cash flow burn, remember there’s ins and outs, so generally speaking. So we have the incoming from Locke & Key and Surfside Girls, and we have the outgoing on two points. One is the general SG&A and the other is on development of the business. So your number that you threw out was $2 million. I don’t give guidance. So I’m a little bit hesitant to get into a lot of detail just to clarify, and then I want Brooke to elaborate a bit more. Are you saying $2 million per quarter or $2 million for the rest of the year?

Unidentified Analyst

Just total.

Ezra Rosensaft

Okay. So let me – yes, great question, excellent question. Let me have Brooke add some information on the CFO front and see if anything I want to add to that.

Brooke Feinstein

Sure. So cash right now is being used to invest in originals. There’s advances and there’s lots of money being put in there that we actually won’t see the P&L and cash inflows in for three or four years out even. So I think that we can’t say exactly, but approximation for now somewhat accurate, the cash inflows from even some shows like Surfside Girls, it’s over some periods of time. So let’s say approximately yes, but hoping to get some of that cash inflow and not being positive once kind of we get the money from the originals and that kind of feeds back into the entertainment side of things.

Ezra Rosensaft

Yes. I would just add for the sake of sort of obvious clarity is that media companies other than really large ones who are super well capitalized with hundreds of million dollars in balance sheet, which we don’t have. Generally speaking, media companies should not fit on cash, but should use it to develop property. But we are very careful not to burn more than like, let’s say $2 million, it’s a good estimate. We wouldn’t want to burn more cash than necessary by investing in a thousand, right, a thousand titles because we wouldn’t be able to sustain that.

So we’re very careful and selective in top quality, which means something that will be monetizable not just in publishing, but in entertainment. And that goes through the rigorous process of starting with many submissions that come in, ultimately to what we decide to print and entertainment decide to pitch and hopefully sell. So it’s a great question because it strikes at the heart of the business of how we reinvest the money we receive and how we monitor the balance sheet.

Unidentified Analyst

Got it. Great. Thank you so much.

Operator

Thank you. As there are no more questions, this concludes our question-and-answer session and conference call. I will now hand the call back to Mr. Rosensaft for closing remarks.

Ezra Rosensaft

Thank you, operator. Everyone, thank you for joining us today. Have a great summer. We look forward to speaking with you at our next quarter. Be well, stay safe and healthy.

Operator

This concludes today’s conference and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*