Silgan Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:SLGN) Q2 2022 Earnings Conference Call July 27, 2022 11:00 AM ET
Company Participants
Kim Ulmer – Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer
Adam Greenlee – President and Chief Executive Officer
Bob Lewis – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Adam Josephson – KeyBanc
Mark Wilde – Bank of Montreal
Arun Viswanathan – RBC Capital Markets
Gabe Hajde – Wells Fargo
Matt Krueger – Baird
Daniel Rizzo – Jefferies
George Staphos – Bank of America
Operator
Please stand by. Thank you for joining the Silgan Holdings Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Results Conference Call. Today’s call is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to Kim Ulmer, Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer, Silgan Holdings. Please go ahead.
Kim Ulmer
Thank you. Joining me from the company today, I have Adam Greenlee, President and CEO; and Bob Lewis, EVP and CFO. Before we begin the call today, we would like to make it clear that certain statements made today on this conference call may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the company, and therefore, involve a number of uncertainties and risks, including, but not limited to, those described in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for 2021 and other filings with the SEC. Therefore, the actual results of operations or financial condition of the company could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.
With that, I’ll turn it over to Adam.
Adam Greenlee
Thank you, Kim, and welcome everyone to our second quarter 2022 earnings call. I’ll make a few comments about the second quarter and share our thoughts regarding the remainder of the year. Bob will then review our financial performance and provide more detail about our 2022 outlook, and then we’ll be happy to answer any questions at that point. We delivered yet another quarter of record earnings driven by the strength of our operational performance and the power of our diverse portfolio. Silgan’s ability to perform in the face of ongoing and evolving economic uncertainties gives us great confidence in delivering another year of significant earnings growth in 2022.
We look forward to discussing our strong quarterly results and more importantly, our favorable operational outlook for the remainder of the year and beyond. As you’ve seen in this morning’s press release, we delivered an all-time record adjusted earnings of $1.08 per diluted share, which exceeded the high end of our earnings estimate and represents a 27% increase versus the $0.85 per diluted share reported in the second quarter of 2021.
Each of our business segments proactively and successfully managed to mitigate the ongoing impact of inflation and supply chain disruptions while leveraging outstanding operational performance. As expected, certain areas of our business faced challenging year-over-year volume comparisons. And we executed our plan to more efficiently manage inventory and to further drive down operating costs.
In addition, our exceptional service levels allowed us to continue to meet our customers’ needs and our strong commercial relationships ensured our ability to successfully pass through the significant inflation we are experiencing. Together, these combined actions drove outstanding financial results as we manage through the expected, but complex volume backdrop.
Given our record first half performance and our outlook for the remainder of the year, which now includes a sizable FX and interest headwind, we are confirming our full year earnings estimate in the range of $3.90 to $4.05 per diluted share, representing a 17% increase at the midpoint over our record 2021 levels.
With that, I’ll turn it over to Bob.
Bob Lewis
Thank you, Adam. Good morning, everyone. We’re very pleased with our overall performance. Noting each of our businesses successfully recovered their cost inflation and worked hard to eliminate previous manufacturing disruptions and inefficiencies related to running our plants full out for 18 months, allowing them to reduce costs and improve performance. As expected, volume comparisons versus the prior year were tough, but allowed us to reach our operating efficiency targets earlier than expected.
The result was a strong quarter, delivering adjusted earnings per diluted share of $1.08 for the second quarter 2022, which was above the high end of our estimate for the quarter. I’ll also note the quarter was negatively impacted by $0.04 as a result of unfavorable foreign currency translation. On a consolidated basis, net sales for the second quarter 2022 increased $195.1 million or 14.5% versus the prior year to 1,540 million as each of our segments delivered top line improvement.
These increases were largely the result of higher average selling prices due to the pass through of higher raw material and other manufacturing costs and the inclusion of $56 million for the quarter from the recent acquisitions, which were partly offset by lower volumes in the metal container and custom container segment and unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately 45 million.
We converted these sales to adjusted income before interest in taxes for the quarter of $186.6 million after adjustments of $3.4 million for rationalization charges and $25.2 million for the charge related to the settlement with the European Commission versus $153.4 million after adjustments of $400,000 for rationalization charges in the prior year quarter. This improvement was a result of increases in each of the segments.
Highlights for our individual segments are as follows: adjusted segment income and the dispensing and specialty closure segment increased $17.4 million to a record $91.3 million in the second quarter of 2022, after adjustments of $100,000 for rationalization charges in 2021. The increase was primarily due to favorable cost pass-throughs, strong operating performance and higher volumes, including from the recent acquisitions, which contributed approximately $5.5 million for the quarter.
These benefits were partially offset by inflation in manufacturing costs and unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately $5 million in the current period. Adjusted segment income in the Metal Containers segment was $69.8 million, up 11 million versus the prior year, after adjustments of $3.4 million in 2022 and $200,000 in 2021, each for rationalization charges. This increase was primarily attributable to favorable price pass-throughs, particularly for non-contract customers and strong operating performance, including from our inventory management program, partially offset by inflation in manufacturing costs, the expected unit volume decline of 10% and unfavorable mix of can sold an unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately $2 million.
Adjusted segment income in the Custom Containers segment increased $3.6 million to $30.9 million for the quarter, after adjusting for rationalization charges of $100,000 in 2021. This increase was largely attributable to higher average selling prices due to the pass-through of inflation, strong operating performance. And the benefit from the lag pass-through of lower resin costs as compared to the lag pass-through of higher resin costs in the prior year, partially offset by inflation in manufacturing costs and lower volumes.
Turning now to our outlook for 2022, we have delivered record performance through the first half of 2022 and our outstanding operations performance in each of our businesses is expected to continue through the remainder of the year. As discussed, we continue to have inflationary headwinds, rising interest rates and unfavorable foreign currency outlook as a dollar continues to strengthen.
As a result, we are confirming our full year earnings estimates in the range of $3.90 to $4.05, which at the midpoint represents 17% increase over the record 2021 performance. This estimate assumes current exchange rates for euro to dollar, which will unfavorably impact earnings per diluted share by approximately $0.03 in the second half of 2022 versus our previous estimates.
In addition, assuming the current forward curve for interest rates, we anticipate an additional unfavorable impact of $0.05 as a result of higher interest expense. We’re also providing a third quarter 2022 estimate of adjusted earnings in the range of a $1.15 to a $1.30 per diluted share, which at the midpoint represents a 20% increase over the record 2021 performance of a $1.02 per diluted share in a third quarter of 2021. This estimate assumes current exchange rates for euro to dollar, which will unfavorably impact earnings per diluted share by approximately $0.02 in a third quarter of 2022.
And in addition, assuming current forward curve for interest rates, we anticipate an additional unfavorable impact of $0.02 in the quarter as a result of higher interest expense. Based on our current outlook for 2022, we’re also maintaining our free cash flow guidance of approximately $350 million has improvements in cash from operations will be offset by the inclusion of the payment for the $25.2 million settlement with the European commission.
That concludes our prepared comments. So Justin, I’ll now turn it over to you and ask you to provide directions for the Q&A.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
Well, thank you. [Operator Instructions] The first question will come from George Staphos with Bank of America
George Staphos
Hi guys. Good morning. Thanks for the details and for taking my question. Two questions to start and I’ll turn it over the first one, a little bit of a multipart on dispensing. So can you talk about your observations on the cyclicality of dispensing, especially as we may be going into a slowdown and how your views on dispensing cyclicality or lack thereof have evolved since you first sort of grew the business largely with the acquisitions over the last couple of years? And related to dispensing, on Page 3 of your release, you mentioned a number of things that contributed to earnings, strong operating performance, selling prices, inventory management, cost recovery.
Is there a way that you can sort of size those for us to some degree so that we can bridge your EBIT performance in that segment? And then the second question unrelated and I’ll turn it over. Obviously, there’s been a lot discussed about can sheet – aluminum can sheet supply, given recent news, your press release says your guidance assumes you’re able to obtain raw materials which presumably includes aluminum, but can you update us on your ability to source and get can sheet and your exposure there? Thank you. Aluminum can sheet. Thank you.
Adam Greenlee
Sure. Thanks, George. I think Bob and I will ham and egg the first question, and I’ll come back to the aluminum afterwards. I think as we look at our Dispensing and Specialty Closures segment, I mean, it has evolved certainly over time. And I think one of the really interesting things to talk about George is what happened right at the time that we acquired the Albéa business, it’s primarily focused in beauty and fragrance, right at the beginning of the pandemic. And that volume suffered dramatically at the beginning of the pandemic and what we call the power of the portfolio, the balance of our dispensing, especially closure segment, more than offset. The volume declines of at the time was what we would call a discretionary spend item. I think as we fast forward to today, you’re seeing a little bit of the reversal of that.
Fragrance and beauty have recovered incredibly well, certainly well in advance of where we were at the time of the acquisition and what we suffered through the early parts of the pandemic. So feel really good about the balance of that portfolio.
Obviously, we’ve got a large food and beverage business that’s inside of dispensing and specialty closures. That’s very resilient in any time for us historically. And believe our forecast is solid on the food and beverage side as well. So I think it’s a very balanced business when we talk about power of the portfolio, we’re talking about all of Silgan. But certainly in our Dispensing and Specialty Closure segment, the diversity of that segment itself, the breadth and depth of the products we have, the markets we serve provides a very balanced performance and kind of what we continue to call any economic circumstance. So hopefully that answers that question, George. And then Bob, I’ll throw it over to you on the earnings piece of DSC.
Bob Lewis
Yes. So George, I think I’ll try and bucket it for you. So obviously I called out in the prepared remarks that acquisitions contributed about $5.5 million to that segment. The other two big pieces, really I’ll bucket it into two pieces. One is our ability to pass through price. And I think that’s a testament to the service levels that we have in that business. Across the board both in the U.S. and in Europe, we did a really nice job of communicating with customers and getting that price pass-through going through.
I think the operational performance and the inventory adjustment kind of goes hand in hand because it’s our ability to really get through and pass some of the inefficiencies that we’ve seen over time that really allowed us to kind of proactively go after the inventory levels there. So I would say the remaining difference there was probably split between price and then the operation improvement and the inventory.
Adam Greenlee
And then George, your second question on aluminum supply, I think how we would characterize it George is we’ve been aware of the magnesium situation and supply situation for many months back into 2021. And we’ve been proactively working not only with our suppliers, but throughout the supply chain to mitigate any of the impacts to sell good any of our customers. So therefore really for us, there was no impact in the second quarter due to the active management of the situation.
And then between inventory management in a more diversified supply chain, we expect no impact in the third quarter as well. We think that force majeure situation mostly is going to be resolved early in the fourth quarter. So, we’re certainly aware of it. It’s something we’ve been managing for quite a while now. And it has no impact on the bottom line to our business. And we don’t think it’s going to have any impact in Q3 and Q4.
George Staphos
Fair to say that mostly aluminum is in pet, would that be right?
Adam Greenlee
Yes, in the Metal Container business, yes. That’s the metal closures that are also utilized aluminum freight, but that’s the majority.
George Staphos
Understood. Thank you. I’ll turn it over.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question will come from Adam Josephson with KeyBanc.
Adam Josephson
Adam, Bob, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Bob, you mentioned, I think that FX will be a $0.03 drag full year compared to what you were thinking three months ago, interest will be a $0.05 drag. So $0.08, right there, obviously you’re maintaining your guidance range. It’s a $0.15 range. Is there anything that you could point to that’s offsetting those? Or are you thinking you might be at the lower end of the range? Can you help me with that issue of what if anything is offsetting those drags that you called out in your prepared remarks?
Bob Lewis
Well, obviously we’ve got over performance in the front part of the year, right, which we think will continue. But I guess, you do have those things that are relative to the backdrop of already performing well. We don’t – we’re not necessarily forecasting improvements from where we are right now in the near-term. I may answer the question slightly differently. And just as I think about sort of the opportunities and the risks against the forecast on the risk side, obviously there could be further FX moves, right? So every $0.05 of change in FX rate is worth about $0.04 to the EPS line for the full year. So roughly $0.01 a quarter who knows where interest rates are going to go, right?
We’re pegged at the current spot rate right now. Obviously as Adam just said, the raw materials we think we’re fine, but that could cut either way. And then, obviously we’re feeling like we’re pretty well through some of our customer supply chain issues, but that if they were to recur, that would – those are all things that would lead us to the lower end. And then to the operation opportunities, you got the opportunity to get more efficiencies. Resin costs right now looks like it could be an opportunity for us on a go forward basis. And I think there’s some opportunity around pack volume that sits there. So that’s kind of the puts and takes against the forecast.
Adam Josephson
Yes. Thanks. And just on the volumes in the quarter, were they much of any different than what you were expecting? Can you just talk about any surprises in terms of your volumes in 2Q and then any changes in terms of your full year volume expectations in any of your segments compared to where you sat three months ago?
Adam Greenlee
Sure. Adam, I think I’ll start with dispensing and specialty closures. I think the surprise that occurred during the quarter was major retailers coming out and talking about an inventory correction that they were doing within their four walls. So the inventory correction we had been talking about relating to kind of hard surface cleaners, our home and hygiene products really that was between ourselves and our customers and the supply chain amongst us.
So when the retail folks came out and stated they were going to reduce their inventories that did impact our second quarter volume. For those products, again, we’re talking garden, home hygiene, primarily with our trigger sprayer volume. Our trigger sprayers were down 32% versus prior year. And that’s a surprising number to us that we hadn’t seen before. The good news is that volume recovers within the year. So you transfer out to the full year of dispensing and specialty that one quarter change, and the impact to Q3 will reduce our full year outlook for volume in dispensing and specialty.
I’d say, our organic volume is going to be down slightly. But when you consider the acquisitions, we are going to be up mid single digits. So that’s the updated outlook for dispensing and specialty. Most of that also applies to our Custom Container business because of the similar markets that they’re dealing with in garden and home and hygiene. What I’d also say, Adam is that nothing about this temporary further inventory reduction changes our long-term outlook. So as we turn the page to 2023, nothing about what has happened here has changed our outlook for volume in either one of those two businesses.
And then I’ll transition to the Metal Container business, really no surprise. The years played out essentially, as we’d expected. I think Bob did a very good job explaining the operational impacts that we’ve been able to achieve on the lower volume that we’ve had. But as we roll forward into Q3, we’re expecting our second highest all time shipment level in Q3 for our Metal Container segment only to the Q3 of prior year.
So, that volume was up kind of mid double digits, 15% last year. We think the full year volume has settled in Metal Containers and a rate that’s approximately 10% above pre-pandemic levels. So that has not changed for us versus our last forecast. And I think as we roll Metal Containers into 2023, nothing’s changed there either. Pet food continues to grow. It continues to grow as our share of our Metal Containers business and continues to grow at a good clip as we go forward.
So we’re feeling good about the volume story in all of our businesses. The real benefit in 2022 is that we’re getting back to the operational efficiencies and low cost platform that we had experienced for many, many years pre-pandemic.
Adam Josephson
No, that’s terrific. Just one follow-up to that you’re answer and then one other question. So Walmart just came out and said, what two days ago that they expect further pressure on general merchandise, because inflation on consumables is so substantial that it’s crimping people’s ability to buy apparel, general merchandise, et cetera. Is that something that could further – cause further supply chain corrections, if you will? Or is that already something you’ve taken into account?
Adam Greenlee
I think that’s definitely included in our updated guidance for the year. I think that most recent announcement, which was either this week or late last week. And to your point, Adam, that was more about apparel and some other discretionary spend items. The original inventory reduction that the big box retailers announced, I think it was late April or May. That’s the one that actually impacted our products. So we think we fully factored into the year for the most part, as I kind of alluded to earlier. Our products are very resilient and have a good share of that dollar that’s being spent in very uncertain economic times.
Adam Josephson
I really appreciate it. And just one last one, Adam, I think you said in your prepared comments that your favorable operational outlook relates not only to this year, but also beyond. And I think you were going to touch on that further. Any preliminary thoughts on next year that you would care to share with us at this point just based on what you’ve seen midway through the year? Do you think these are normalized volume levels across the board? Any thoughts about the baseline for next year would be helpful? Thank you very much.
Adam Greenlee
Sure. It’s a great question. And I think as we sit here and we talk about 2023, I’ll be very clear and say we’re before our budgeting or budget process with our businesses at this point. So, we’re very early days in having those conversations. But I think the best example I can give you, Adam, is related to our Metal Container business. If you go back to pre-pandemic levels, what I would tell you is, we have about food can business in the world. We were highly efficient, we had the right mix of technology between two piece and three piece. We had the right operational footprint to support our customers at a cost advantage and competitively advantaged manner.
And what I would tell you is, we are using that same operational footprint and operational focus to supply roughly 10% more volume today. And that’s – you dropped 10% additional volume into a fixed cost footprint, that’s a very – that’s a meaningful change to the Metal Containers business.
And as we roll forward into 2023, for clarity, we expect pet food growth to continue next year. And it will continue to become a bigger part of our total Containers business. And with that growth, we’re expecting growth in Metal Containers as one example. So, I just think it’s really leveraging the operational performance that we’ve driven cost out of our system yet again this year and putting the incremental volumes back in on an already efficient system. We’re expecting growth next year.
Adam Josephson
Thanks so much, Adam.
Operator
And our next question will come from Mark Wilde with Bank of Montreal.
Mark Wilde
Thanks. Good morning, Adam. Good morning, Bob. Adam, just to drill a little bit deeper on the Can business through a lot of the [indiscernible], we had an oversupply or parent oversupply situation. In the food can business in North America, I know we had this big jump in volume in the pandemic. If we take the sort of 10% or partial correction that we’re seeing right now and you factor in the increases in supply that we’ve seen in the market. How would you kind of characterize the overall sort of operating environment in food cans right now from just a supply-demand standpoint?
Adam Greenlee
Sure. It’s a great question. I think that as we look at the capacity that’s being added, just for clarity, in 2021, we wanted to be very supportive of the market. We actually did increase our sales volumes to those that could not secure their cans elsewhere. So, as the market was very tight last year, we were able to execute to create more capacity within our system to support the market. And that’s other customers, that’s other can makers. It’s broadly speaking, we believe that food can is an essential product, and it was important to get those products into the market.
So, what you’re seeing in some of these capacity additions is essentially those producers being able to self make the products that we provided last year that made our system incredibly inefficient. So again, as we enter 2022, I think we were pretty clear saying down volume is going to be okay for us, because it’s going to let us get back to operating our footprint and network as Silgan has traditionally done in a very efficient manner.
So, we think it’s pretty well in balance. We think the new sustained kind of normalized rate of food cans is certainly at a much higher rate than it was pre-pandemic. And we feel great about the footprint that we have to support our customers and they’re continuing to do very well in the market. Retail data does absolutely support the fact that food and canned food, in particular, is doing well in these kind of uncertain economic times.
Mark Wilde
Okay. And then you just – you mentioned the release this morning a big customer renewal. Could you put any color around that?
Adam Greenlee
Well, sure. The release did say that it was a contract renewal in our Metal Containers business, and it is for our largest steel food container customer. We aren’t really going to go into any of the details to talk to specifics of any customer agreement, but this renewal is consistent sort of marked with what we’ve done with prior renewals of long-term contracts.
To me, it’s just another example of our commercial success in the market and how our very intimate customer relationships and partnerships create values for both parties. So, we’re excited to have renewed that contract. It is for a long term, just like we would typically do in our Food Container business.
Mark Wilde
Right. And then just one last one for me. Just over in Custom Containers. I know in that business, you move a fair amount of volume through brokers and distributors. And I just – I wondered, does that have any impact on sort of when you see these inventory swings going on in the market, is that more complicated or more multistep distribution – does that have any effect in terms of making those inventory swings sharper?
Adam Greenlee
Sure. I think it’s muted, but it certainly has an impact. When you bring someone else into that supply chain, there inherently is going to be a little bit more inventory that you have to work through. So – it’s an important part of our business. We’ve got good relationships through distribution. We think there’s a real value where they’re providing a set of solutions to customers at the end of the day. But for clarity, it does create a little bit more time to resolve some of the inventory issues that we’re working through particularly on these home and hygiene products.
Mark Wilde
Okay, very good. I’ll turn it over. Thanks, Adam.
Adam Greenlee
Thank you.
Operator
And our next question comes from Arun Viswanathan with RBC Capital Markets.
Arun Viswanathan
Thanks for taking my question. Apologies for that. Yes. So, I guess, first off, if we just think about Q3 and the vegetable and fruit pack, I guess there’s been some reports of wetter weather earlier in the year. What are you kind of expecting, I guess, as we go into that period right now? Thanks.
Adam Greenlee
Hey, Arun, we do expect a good pack. So, as we came into the year, we were expecting a more normalized pack. Just as a reminder, last year, our Metal Containers volumes were up 15% in Q3 as in large part, the vegetable pack was quite strong last year. We’re anticipating a very good pack. So our volumes reflect that in Metal Containers. And so far, we’re off to a very good start. The P pack [ph] in particular is expected to be at sort of record levels for us. That’s a reasonable percent of our overall Pack business.
Corn looks to be very good, tomatoes on the West Coast are good. And remember, most of our products, our core veg is Upper Midwest. So a little bit out of the range of some of that 100-degree weather that the Midwest was working through last week. And then on the West Coast, the vast majority, if not all, of our tomato crops are actually irrigated. So water, while it is an issue in California, we’re able to get that for the irrigation of our crop. So, as we sit here today and we’re one month into the quarter feeling pretty good about the vegetable back.
Arun Viswanathan
Okay. Thanks for that. And then if I could just ask about resin costs, which last year, we’re definitely a negative. We have seen some rolling over in spot polyethylene recently though. How should we think about your exposure there and potential price/cost gap, if there is any, and margin recovery? Thanks.
Adam Greenlee
Sure. So resin, as you said, it’s been volatile really for the first six months of the year. And for us, it’s been inflationary. So, we have really good mechanisms for passing those costs on to the market and to customers. You go across our businesses, we talked about custom containers a lot. They’ve got very tight pass-through mechanisms. So their exposure is pretty limited to the moves of resin, Dispensing and Specialty Closures business has more of a mix of pass-through mechanisms, a little more exposure.
Our forecast right now for the balance of the year, we essentially take what we have – what we know about resin and we hold it flat for the year. So as Bob alluded to, I think there’s some upside to our forecast if resin plays out the way the indices are forecasting it to at this point. We’ve got probably a couple of million of favorability built into our forecast. There’s probably a couple of million more as we go forward if the indices are correct.
I’ll just remind you that we sit here essentially sort of at the start of hurricane season. And I’m pretty sure the indices are not forecasting a hurricane to create supply chain challenges for us. So, I think that’s really where we are with resin at this point.
Arun Viswanathan
Thanks.
Operator
And our next question will come from Gabe Hajde with Wells Fargo.
Gabe Hajde
Adam, Bob, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to revisit flash piggyback off of kind of what George was asking. And I mean I appreciate, and I know that you guys are not asleep at the switch. But maybe play a little bit of double advocate here. I mean, I think to summarize your response, Adam, you said, hey, we’ve got a fairly diversified portfolio within Dispensing during the pandemic when some of the summary discretionary – discretionary items took a hit. We had this offset from surface cleaners, et cetera, but that was also, again, appreciating the fact that there was a pandemic, right? So – if we go into the slowdown, and it feels like a lot of your customers are kind of locked and loaded for the holiday selling season and then it will be about product launches for 2023, kind of in the fragrance beauty cosmetic area.
How are you feeling about kind of innovation pipeline, new product introductions, things like that? And do you feel like should there be a downturn? Again, I appreciate food and beverage component, which $800 million of that segment will do fine. But there’s maybe some cost-out initiatives, and you guys would be proactive there to maintain profit levels in that more acquired piece of the business?
Adam Greenlee
Yes. I’ll start at the end there, Gabe. We’ve done a heck of a job of driving out cost across all three of our businesses. And that’s a hallmark of Silgan. We are good operators. We do operate low cost facilities and we do find ways to provide continuous improvement throughout our operations. So none of that’s changed. I think, maybe the point I’ll focus on in your commentary was really our innovation pipeline. As I sit here today, our innovation pipeline for Dispensing and Specialty Closures is as strong as it’s ever been. So just for clarity, we are winning in really all of the markets that we participate in, whether it be fragrance, whether it be food, beverage we’ve got terrific teams in place. Our pipeline for innovation is full.
And we’ve got products that our customers are recognizing the attributes and the favorable attributes that we bring to the market. So I think the diversified portfolio speaks for itself. I was trying to give the one example that, during the pandemic, you’re right, it was a pandemic, but something happened that impacted one segment of our Dispensing and Specialty Closure segment negatively. It also would have a favorable impact to another side of that business. And I just think we can probably hypothetically play a bunch of games with what happens next and what part of your diversified portfolio is impacted by that? We feel like we’ve got a very balanced portfolio that will withstand any economic uncertainty that comes at us.
Gabe Hajde
No. I appreciate that. And it sounds like, I mean, I kind of got what I was looking for, which is you guys are, it sounds like you’re winning some business in the marketplace. The second question quickly, if you can comment at all. I know I appreciate it. It’s not a very big business, but, food cans in Europe on one hand we could say, hey, they’re – again, they’re under pressure, the consumer over there and maybe the food can, does a little bit better. On either hand, obviously there’s, this ongoing conflict just curious any color there?
Adam Greenlee
Yeah. I mean, our, our European business and food cans in particular has done quite well this year. I’d say the European consumer is a little different than the consumer that we have here in North America. They did not have the pantry loading event because they really don’t have the same level of pantries to load in Europe broadly speaking that we have here in the states and in North America. So that business has been consistent from a volume standpoint, and we’re seeing – continuing to see very good demand across multiple categories, including pet food again, as that’s been a growing market for us.
The impact of Russia and our volume in Russia is obviously the negative piece of what’s happened there in 2022. And we’re continuing to supply from inventory to the market, some essential humanitarian products, particularly vegetable cans for the vegetable pack, but outside of that it’s a very favorable year for us in our European food can business this year.
Gabe Hajde
Thank you guys. And good luck.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question will come from Ghansham Panjabi with Baird.
Matt Krueger
Hi, good morning, everyone. This is actually Matt sitting in for Ghansham. I just wanted to touch on some of the significant price increases that are flowing through across your businesses and really focus in on how that might impact consumer elasticity moving forward. How might that be the case across your various businesses? And have you seen any kind of consumer or customer elasticity impact on the business so far?
Adam Greenlee
Great question, Matt. I think, starting with our Dispensing and Specialty Closure segment, I think the real impact of some of that inflation, it’s very current right now. And I think some of the commentary you see about consumers and consumer activity hasn’t quite made its way into our data. So what I can tell you is in Q2 the consumer was really resilient as it relates to our products. So our products did quite well in an inflationary environment. It’s clear to us that the CPGs are passing through the inflation that they’ve incurred from their supply base onto consumers. You move over to our Metal Containers business and that’s the one again, where I would say, it’s a very resilient segment for us and the consumers continue to procure Metal Containers at a higher rate than they did pre-pandemic.
So we’re feeling really good about that at the retail level. And I think as the dollars get a little tighter, the real benefit there are food and beverage packaging, and we’ve got a significant portion of our overall business portfolio that’s in food and beverage packaging. And I think, as you get to custom containers, our third business, I do think that there’s a segment there that’s food as well that has done quite well through this inflationary environment. I think that the inventory correction that we talked about at retail from a home, from a garden and from a hygiene perspective, those are a little bit of discretionary spending right now that the consumer seems to be moving those dollars and putting them more towards food and beverage. Again, that’s just current information that I don’t know that the data has caught up to just yet.
Matt Krueger
Got it. That’s really helpful. That makes a lot of sense. And then, I just wanted to focus in on the raw material situation and price costs a little bit. We touched on resin already, but what’s your budgeted level of raw material inflation across your business for 2022 overall? How does it compare first half versus second half across your businesses? And then maybe if you could kind of roll that into what the price cost scenarios might look like, what does the tailwind look like as we move throughout the year versus the headwind that we likely saw in the beginning of the year?
Adam Greenlee
Well, so maybe I’ll give that a shot and Bob can help me with anything I miss here. So, you think about raw materials in our Metal Container segment. We talked about resin already. So in the Metal Container segment we had come into the year essentially saying the cost of steel, roughly doubled. I think that’s going to settle in kind of the high-80%, low-90% increase year-over-year. And as you very well know, we have, I’ll say bullet proof, pass through mechanisms to pass those increases onto our customers. We fight like crazy for our customers and work to offset and mitigate that inflation. But unfortunately they are varying the brunt of that, which has been passed on to the consumer.
So that’s roughly in line with what our budget expectation was. And there hasn’t been a whole lot of change, I think from an aluminum perspective, staying in Metal Containers. You have seen some pressure on commodities, certainly on aluminum ingot itself that has come down through the course of the year. So again, that’s almost a direct pass-through for us, with our customers in many cases. And so we think that, the price cost benefit is pretty tightly connected as far as what we experience as what we’re passing through to our customers from a raw material perspective.
I’ll pause and say, I want to repeat what Bob said in his prepared remarks. We have done a fantastic job from an operational standpoint, driving cost out of our system. And that’s getting all the inefficiencies of supplying everyone with a variety of products last year, back to a more efficient operation this year across all three of our businesses, that’s where the cost benefit has really benefited our bottom line year-to-date and we’ll continue to do so for the balance of the year.
Bob Lewis
Yeah, Matt, the other thing I would add to that is that, obviously a big part of our metal business is under long-term contract and Adam kind of touched on those contractual pass-throughs, right? And look, we do that for a very specific reason. We enjoy the benefit of consistent volume through the system, which allows us to leverage our fixed cost. They benefit because they get the scale of our purchase power. It’s a little bit different story in the components of that business that are not contracted and that’s where we have a little more price cost favorability there. And so we are on it, our businesses are on it from the perspective of making sure that we’re capturing that inflation, particularly in non-contract parts of the business
Matt Krueger
Is the – for Dispensing and Custom Containers, is it basically any price cost tailwind would basically be centered around the resin impact, there’s nothing added on top of there?
Adam Greenlee
Well, I think, as Bob just alluded to, there’s a portion of that business that is non-contract as well or non long-term contract, that there is in certain pockets of Dispensing and Specialty Closures. We do have some pricing power and we have recovered price in those market spots where we were able to. And again, we’ve got a metal closures component that fits into our Dispensing and Specialty Closures segment that has very similar pass throughs to what we just described on the Metal Container side of our business.
Matt Krueger
Okay, great. That’s helpful. Thank you.
Operator
And our next question will come from Kyle White with Deutsche Bank.
Kyle White
Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just wanted to focus on Metal Containers and the volumes there. You initially targeted, I think, mid single digit declines this year, and it’s turning quite a bit below that. Your commentary seems to remain relatively unchanged since last quarter when you point to volumes relative to pre-pandemic levels. So just trying to better understand do you have a new target for what you think volumes will be this year, and then maybe what’s kind of the difference relative to that initial target?
Adam Greenlee
Sure. I think we feel roughly the same about Metal Containers that we did coming into the year. So maybe two things to think about there. One, obviously, we had known about the pre-buy impact on the year and that was factored into our guidance as well. I think maybe the learning that we’ve had through the first half of the year, Kyle, is that our customers in pet food who had invested in additional capacity who have installed additional capacity, continue to struggle with the supply side of ingredients and of labor and other packaging materials. Our cans are ready to go. Our capacity is ready for them when they’re able to fill more volume. The reality is there are still stockouts in pet food at the retail level. And we believe that and they continued to communicate with us that they could sell more if they could sell more.
So we had a greater pet food assumption for volume growth in the first half than what has been delivered by our customers simply because they cannot find the labor and security ingredients and other packaging materials. So how does that translate into the full year? Our Q3 volumes we always knew Q3 was going to be a very strong volume quarter for 2022. So nothing’s changed from that perspective. We think that pack is going to be a really good pack.
As I mentioned this, our anticipation for the third quarters, it’ll be the second highest shipment level that we’ve had in our company history compared to the prior year third quarter. And then how that plays out through the course of the year was fourth quarter. We’ll wait and see what happens with steel pricing as we go into 2023, but if we were expecting down kind of mid single digits coming into the year, Kyle, we’re probably just a couple of points beyond that right now, because of the lack of our pet food customer’s ability to execute against the higher volume that they’ve invested for. And we think that will resolve itself certainly in the back half and we’re planning on being fully resolved as we go into next year.
Kyle White
Got it. And then just two quick follow-ups on Metal Containers, you had a small closure during the quarter. Can you just talk about that and the reasoning for it and any cost savings related to it? And then on the new, on the contract, not new, the contract renewal does that present any kind of margin headwind next year? I think as typically, historically you start a lower point and you work your way up through productivity on the life of the contract?
Bob Lewis
Yes. I’ll take the rationalization and then Adam can comment on the contract. Yes, we did announce a closure in our lion’s facility. That’s not really anything new, right? It’s what’s back to kind of one of the plants that we had talked about previously in the footprint restructuring and that one in particular is not a reduction of capacity in totality. That’s a plant that’s been around for a long time. Customers have continued to migrate their filling locations to other geographies. So this is just sort of a move of capacity if you will to align ourselves with where customers are filling. So as to avoid the kind of incidents that we experienced a few years ago, where we were out of orbit with freight and cost structure. So nothing more than that.
And then somewhere along the line, you probably noticed that there was some layoffs in the Sacramento plant, that’s just routine seasonality. That happens year in and year out, just given the seasonality of that particular plant.
Adam Greenlee
And then Kyle, over to the contract renewal, it’s just a typical long-term contract renewal. So as we’ve talked about over time, typically over time as we make operational improvements and gain a little bit of margin through the contract and operational improvements, that’s then kind of revisited with the customer during the negotiation. So just a very typical contract renewal.
Kyle White
Sounds good. Appreciate it.
Operator
And our next question will come from Daniel Rizzo with Jefferies.
Daniel Rizzo
Hi, everyone. Thank you for fitting me in. Could you – have you thought about what the effect of energy could tell it would be on your production in Europe or on the production of your customers?
Adam Greenlee
It’s a good question, Dan. As we look at again, kind of our products, we believe our products are essential humanitarian products. A lot of food products that we manufacture in Europe, beverage products that we manufacture in Europe. So we feel very good about maintaining our operations throughout the European community. There are some of our facilities, particularly on the dispensing and specialty closure side that are focused on fragrance. We have spent a lot of time talking to our customers with our customers about plans to mitigate any impact from tighten supply of energy and just how we would work through that.
But at this point, we don’t have the sensitivity to what those plans would mean in 2023. We feel really good about where we are through the end of the year now, and we’ll continue those conversations. And if there’s something to report as we go forward related to 2023, we’ll be happy to talk about it then.
Daniel Rizzo
That’s great. Thank you for the color. And then just my second question, you mentioned capacity in food cans and expansions. I was just wondering what your current capacity utilization is and what your goal is or if there’s a target?
Adam Greenlee
Well, if you think about, again, where we were through the pandemic, I would say we were fully utilized through the pandemic. But we were not operating in an efficient manner. So while our volumes were greater, kind of our internal dialogue here, we were – we take great pride in making the right can and the right plant, which is right next to our customers. And given the demands on the business, we were making cans in a different plant and not necessarily next to a customer.
So the way we want to run our facilities, we’re very efficient. We’re highly utilized. There is incremental capacity on the shoulders of our calendar year that we typically talk about. But its volume that would have to travel quite a ways almost to the point that Bob was just making about the closure of our lion facility to reach consumers. So we just don’t think that’s a very viable option under normal circumstances. So the way we want to run our plants, we’re very efficient. We’re highly utilized. I don’t want to give you utilization number because it’s different by each one of our facilities and each one of our businesses. So I’ll just tell you, it’s the most efficient footprint in the food can manufacturing industry, and I’m going to say worldwide.
Bob Lewis
Yes. Dan, I think you can also think about utilization rates in two very different forms, right? And as Adam said, the way we want to run our plants is important. And that’s sort of historically where we’ve been, where the rates have been relatively high against the staffing of those plants, which allows us to get to efficiency gains in those plants. During the pandemic, we were – we had shift differential changes that gave us the ability at least for a short period of time, albeit we ran them that way for 18 months. But that’s not sustainable, right? So this is really getting us back to a sustainable rate of utilization where the plants are at their most efficient point.
Daniel Rizzo
Okay. Thank you very much.
Operator
And our next question will come from Alex Lorenzo [ph] with Truist Securities.
Unidentified Analyst
Hey Adam. Hey Bob. Congrats on the quarter. Great stuff. Looking forward to more, actually all my questions were just answered, so I don’t have any more at this time.
Adam Greenlee
Great. Thank you.
Bob Lewis
All right. Great. Thanks, Alex.
Operator
And our next question will come from George Staphos with Bank of America.
George Staphos
Hi guys. Thanks for taking the follow on. So on metal to the extent that you can comment. The last time we had a third quarter that was in the $100 million range of EBIT or in excess to be fair was 2015, 2016. Now on the one hand volumes will be down off of a record. In 3Q, it’s going to be very packed driven, which is tends to be lower mix. However, you have said, you’re going to be more efficient operationally. Is this a quarter where you get back over $100 million in the metal business after a few years where you haven’t been that range during 3Q? How should we think about that if you can comment?
Adam Greenlee
Well, I think it’s a great question. And maybe instead of giving you exact numbers, whether it’s a $100 million above or below, what I tell you is that we are into a very efficient operating window of time. The volume is 10% greater than it was pre pandemic level. So I would just say, George, we’re thinking about a really good third quarter. If you look at the totality of our guidance, our Q3 is up 27% at the midpoint for EPS versus the prior year record. And so a big chunk of that’s going to come from our metal container business and the leverage of that volume on the fixed cost base.
George Staphos
Okay. We appreciate the thoughts there. I guess, related to metal and maybe something you don’t really want to get into too much discussion on, but could you just remind us for posterity, maybe the background again on the European commission investigation and how ultimately the evolution and the settlement wound up relative to what your expectations would’ve been going into it?
Bob Lewis
Yes, George, this is Bob. This dates back to obviously well into the prior periods. It essentially deals with one employee in Germany that was accused of sharing some information amongst the trade group on sales volume.
And I’ll remind everybody that, that kind of coincides with a period of time where we were doing a lot of work around BPA [ph] non-intent in particular. So there was sort of an industry-wide desire to make sure we – the industry was able to convert and protect volume for the food can.
Be that as it may, the German Commission raised it spend a number of years trying to find some activity there. It ultimately didn’t come to fruition, and we had then applied for leniency in Germany. Ultimately, the German authorities dropped and it got picked up by the European Commission based on everything that we knew at the time, we didn’t believe that there was much there.
Fast forward five years plus, spending a fair bit of money on proceeding. And ultimately, we felt it best to just get it off our shoe and move on. And so that’s the settlement. What transpired, obviously, is that we didn’t get the leniency because we didn’t think there was much to worry about. And ultimately, that’s why the differential there.
George Staphos
Understood. I appreciate you going to that, Bob. Last thing, there have been a lot of questions understandably on inflation into the second half into next year. And obviously, you’ll need to manage against that. On the raw side, can you talk to is not that fixed costs and labor are the biggest portion of your cost structure, certainly not in Metal. But nonetheless, can you talk just a little bit about the inflation we’re seeing in some of the fixed line items in your cost structure? And how that might look in particular in 2023?
And if you have any specific or different ways of approaching it or maybe it’s the same playbook in terms of managing against that into next year? Thanks and good luck in the quarter.
Bob Lewis
Sure, George. The – probably the biggest inflationary item other than perhaps energy is going to be on the wage line and obviously, contractually, we pass that through. Again, it gets passed through on a lagged basis as part of the index. So there’s recovery coming, at least in the contractual part of the business.
I think generally, it’s large enough that we and everyone else are going to have to pass it through. So unfortunately, it’s just another element of inflationary consequence that the consumer is ultimately going to feel – so it’s – obviously, you can just look around and see the order of magnitude of what’s happening in the world.
It’s sizable inflation. So that combined with energy is going to add up to a fairly sizable pass-through again next year.
George Staphos
And where it’s not passed through, how you handle?
Bob Lewis
Yes. Look, I think it comes right back to the discipline that all of the teams have been sort of laser-focused on through this year that, in particular, where we don’t have contracts, and the customer is bearing the brunt of that right now. We are passing it through.
And I think, look, let’s face it, when inflation is as high as it is, everybody sort of understands that it has to get passed along because it’s too big for one party to absorb.
George Staphos
Understood. Thank you, guys. Thank you, Bob.
Bob Lewis
Hey, George, I’ll just – I’ll come back to your other question about Q3. Look, I think go back and look at Q3 last year, and we were pretty close to that benchmark. Obviously, we had some inefficiencies in that quarter. So given everything that we’re expecting about Q3 this year, I think you’re well within in balance to be thinking that this is a quarter that could – could break the $100 million.
George Staphos
That’s what I was getting at. I appreciate it. Thanks guys.
Operator
And our next question will come from Adam Josephson with KeyBanc.
Adam Josephson
Thanks very much for taking our follow up. This is for Adam or Bob. Just on capital allocation and leverage. It seems like you’ll end the year about three times, which is smacked up in the middle of your range. Obviously, you can carry a lot more than that, if you need to. But just given the economic environment we’re in, how are you thinking about the potential for large acquisitions, repurchases where you want to be within your leverage target range, et cetera?
Bob Lewis
Yes. Good question, Adam. Look, I think you had it right in terms of where we’ll end. What I would add to that is, obviously, we’re looking forward into next year, thinking that free cash flow improves from the $350 million this year. And so that’s – if you think about it 18 months from now, will be sort of headed towards the low end of the range.
So I think what that does for us, it gives us perfect flexibility that if the markets really start to rattle because of leverage, then obviously, we’ve taken that off the table. If – and I agree with you that this business, with its cash flow generation can handle the leverage for sure. So I think we still keep a keen eye on the M&A markets and for the right transaction, we would do it.
I think one of the other arrows that we have in our quiver, so to speak, is that we’ve got some incremental capacity through our bank facility. So we don’t necessarily have to go to the credit markets, which are right now a little bit disruptive in order to do a deal. I’m not suggesting we could handle a very large transaction that way. But for small to modest tuck-ins, we absolutely could do that.
So I think we’ll continue to keep ourselves abreast of the M&A market and pull the trigger where it makes sense. And then ultimately, we look at sort of share repurchases as the benchmark for any of those activities, right? So what’s in it for the shareholder for us to do an acquisition versus a return of capital, so to speak?
So I think that’s certainly out there for us to consider. You probably saw that we got reauthorization for up to $300 million from the Board more recently, that’s just sort of a reset of a previous authorization. I’ll tell you that given – and you can see it in the financial statements, given some of the dislocation we saw in the stock during the quarter, we bought back about $26 million worth of shares. So that’s utilization of about 10% of that authorization.
So I think we will be very opportunistic about how we – which levers we pull around the capital allocation. Obviously, our preference is to continue to try and find ways to continue to grow the portfolio.
Adam Josephson
I really appreciate that, Bob. And just my last one for Adam, which is your – I mentioned this, I think, on the last call, but your last Investor Day three years ago, you were trying to combat the perception of yourselves as a recession stock, if you will. And so now here we are, it looks like we’re heading into a recession. So obviously, there are merits for owning Silgan in that type of environment. But I know that’s not necessarily the perception you want investors to have of the company. I just you own it, going into a recession. So Adam, what do you think of the investor perception of the company at this point versus what you think perhaps the reality is?
Adam Greenlee
Great question. I think that from my perspective, investors do – and even on today’s call, what I would say, a lot of questions about our second largest business from a profit standpoint in Metal Containers. So I think there is still a perception that, we are a can business and a defensive business and just by its very nature.
Our can business is wonderful. It’s a cash-generating powerhouse, and we love our can business. I think that, when you think about the evolution that we’ve been making over the last, call it, five to seven years, we have more growth aspects to our business today than we did five or seven years ago. And we’re in categories that do provide growth beyond GDP, beyond kind of some other lower growth rate product categories. And that’s exciting for us.
But it’s a blend, and it’s the power of the portfolio that is the message that we’re trying to deliver to the investor and to the market that we actually provide the best of both worlds.
We’ve got an incredibly stable business, that’s focused on core products and food and beverage. We’ve got a strong competitively advantaged growing business in categories that are growing at a much faster rate. And then when you take our operational performance and our commercial relationships, Adam, we believe we’re positioned to grow in those markets at a faster rate than the market itself is growing.
And I think that for us, we like to point backwards and talk about what we’ve actually delivered. And I would just say when you look at what we’ve delivered from a performance perspective, we’re very proud of the results and what our teams have done and the growth that we have provided. And we think that translates to the go forward as well.
So we’re excited about the portfolio that we have and the products that we take to market every day.
Adam Josephson
Absolutely. Thanks so much Adam. Best of luck.
Adam Greenlee
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. That does conclude the question-and-answer session. I’ll now turn the conference back over to you for any additional or closing remarks.
Adam Greenlee
Thank you, Justin, and thanks, everyone, for your interest in Silgan, and we look forward to discussing our Q3 results in late October.
Operator
Thank you. That does conclude today’s conference. We do thank you for your participation. Have an excellent day.
Be the first to comment