Heritage Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:HFWA) Q3 2022 Earnings Conference Call October 20, 2022 1:00 PM ET
Company Participants
Jeff Deuel – CEO
Donald Hinson – CFO
Tony Chalfant – Chief Credit Officer
Bryan McDonald – President and COO
Conference Call Participants
Eric Spector – Raymond James
Jeff Rulis – DA Davidson
Eleanor Hagan – KBW
Operator
Good morning. Thank you for attending today’s Heritage Financial Corporation Q3 2022 Earnings Call. My name is Bethany, I will be the moderator for today’s call. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Jeff Deuel, CEO of Heritage Financial. Please go ahead.
Jeff Deuel
Thank you, Bethany. Welcome and good morning to everyone who called in and to those who may listen later. This is Jeff Deuel, CEO of Heritage Financial. Attending with me are Don Hinson, Chief Financial Officer; Bryan McDonald, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Tony Chalfant, Chief Credit Officer.
Our earnings release went out this morning pre-market and hopefully, you had an opportunity to review it prior to the call. We have also posted an updated third quarter Investor Presentation on the Investor Relations portion of our corporate website. We will reference the presentation during the call. Please refer to the forward-looking statements in the press release.
We’re very pleased to report a strong third quarter, we reported good organic loan growth, which was aided by lower payoffs, higher line utilization and a pool of purchased residential mortgage loans. We’re pleased with the positive trend we have seen in the number of new commitments and new loan closings across the footprint in spite of strong competition. NIM is improving with the deployment of cash into loans, higher rates with the Fed and growing the investment portfolio.
Don and our Treasurer have done a nice job of carefully managing our investment portfolio over the past couple of years, which has limited impacts of AOCI. We continue to carefully manage expenses, although we are experiencing the impacts of inflation.
You may recall, we guided to a range of $38 million to $39 million for the quarter and we finished slightly above that range. Notably, our long-standing focus on credit quality and actively managing our loan portfolio continues to play out well for us. Staying focused on our conservative risk profile has enabled us to continue to report improving credit trends and provide a good foundation, facing into a potential recession.
We’ll now move to Don, who will give us a – take a few minutes to cover our financial results.
Donald Hinson
Thank you, Jeff.
As Jeff mentioned, overall financial performance was very positive in Q3 and I’ll be reviewing some of the main drivers of our performance. As I walk through our financial results, unless otherwise noted, all the prior period comparisons will be with the second quarter of 2022.
Starting with net interest income, there was an increase of $9.2 million or 18.5% due mostly to higher net interest margin. The net interest margin increased 53 basis points to 3.57% for Q3. This was due mostly to improved yields on earning assets, the leveraging of cash into loans and investments, and continued low cost deposits.
We had another strong quarter of loan growth, with balances increasing $127 million or 3.3%. In addition, yields on the loan portfolio were 4.51% in Q3, which was 21 basis points higher than Q2. Bryan McDonald will have an update on loan production in a few minutes.
In addition, investments increased $326 million due to the additional purchases of securities in Q3 to take advantage of improved market yields. Due to these purchases and the overall rate environment the yield on the investment portfolio increased to 2.63% compared to 2.15% in the prior quarter.
We experienced a decrease of $92 million of deposits during Q3. Most of this decrease occurred late in the quarter as shown by the fact that the average balance was down only $17 million from the prior quarter.
Much of this decrease was due to rate sensitive customers seeking higher yielding investments. We have increased our deposit rates and we are working with our customers on rates to maintain relationships. As a result, we expect to experience an increase in the cost deposits over the next few quarters.
All of our regulatory capital ratios were strongly above well capitalized thresholds and we continue to have a very strong liquidity position. Our TCE ratio is at 7.6%, down from 7.9% at the end of Q2. This decrease was due to the continued decline in the fair value marks on the investment portfolio, which impacts AOCI portion of equity. As of the end of Q3, AOCI had a 140 basis point impact on the TCE ratio. You can refer to Page 30 of the investor presentation for more specifics on capital and liquidity.
Non-interest expense increased $3.4 million to $39.1 million in Q3. This increase was due mostly to an increase in compensation expense and this was due to a combination of inflationary pressures on internal pay scales, a full quarter impact of the new teams hired in Q2, and increase in FTE due to improved success in filling open positions and increased incentive compensation accruals.
Even though we continued to show strong credit quality metrics, including reduction in non-accrual loans and realizing net recoveries for the quarter, we recognized provision for credit losses of $1.9 million during Q3, due mostly to increases in loan balances as well as the lengthening of the duration of certain loan segments, which impacts the allowance calculation.
I will now pass the call to Tony, who will go into detail on this credit quality metrics.
Tony Chalfant
Thank you, Don.
As Don stated, credit quality remained strong. During the quarter we saw positive trends across the portfolio, with notable declines in nonperforming assets and criticized loans. As of September 30, non-accrual loans totaled $6.2 million and we do not hold any OREO. This represents 1.16% of total loans and 1.09% of total assets.
During the third quarter, non-accrual loans declined by $4.2 million or 40%. We’ve now reduced non-accrual loans by $17.5 million or 74% from year-end 2021. The significant improvement during the third quarter was primarily due to our ability to return one owner-occupied commercial real estate loans with an outstanding balances $3.4 million back to accrual status. This borrower had been significantly impacted by COVID and their improved financial performance warranted an upgrade. There were no loans moved to non-accrual status during the quarter.
Our delinquent loans, which we define as those over 30 days past due and still accruing, remains very low at $3 million or 0.08% of total loans. Page 22 of the investor presentation highlights the success we’ve had in reducing non-performing assets. Criticized loans, those risk-rated special mentions and substandard, declined by approximately 9% or $16 million during the third quarter and are now down 18% from year-end 2021.
As of September 30, criticized loans totaled $151 million or 3.8% of total loans. At year-end 2020, criticized loans were $291 million and our current level represents a decrease of 48% from what we consider to be the high point of this credit cycle.
As expected, we saw meaningful improvement in our hotel loans during the quarter. While this portfolio still represent 30% of our criticized loans, this is down from the 36% at the end of the last quarter. It’s important to note that much of the improvement in our substandard loan totals declining by $28 million during the quarter, was due to the upgrade of two hotel loans to special mention, based on improved operating performance.
If the improvement in the travel industry continues, we would expect to see more upgrades in this portfolio over the next two quarters. Criticized loan totals are now very close to where we were at the end of 2019. We consider that to be a normalized level before the effects of the pandemic began to impact the loan portfolio. For more details on our criticized loans, please refer to Page 23 in the investor presentation.
During the third quarter, we experienced very low charge-offs of $138,000, all from our consumer portfolio. These consumer loans, consumer losses were low when compared to historical norms and were primarily auto loans, small unsecured lines of credit and credit cards. They were more than offset by recoveries of $612,000 leading to a net recovery of $474,000 for the quarter. A significant portion of the recoveries in the quarter came from successful long term workout strategies for several commercial loans.
Year-to-date, we are in a net recovery position of $980,000. Over the last four quarters combined, we had net recoveries of $514,000. This is unusually strong performance even when compared to our historic experience, which has generally been lower than our peers. As a comparison, our average annual net charge-offs for the three-year period 2018 to 2020 was approximately $2.9 million.
While our markets continue to perform well, we are mindful of the broader macroeconomic concerns and the potential recessionary environment. We continue to use a disciplined approach in our credit decisions and despite competitive pressures, have not changed our underwriting guidelines. Our loan portfolio remains well diversified by both product type and geography and is granular in nature. We believe we are well positioned to perform well in whatever type of economic environment materializes in the future.
I’ll now turn the call over to Bryan who will have an update on loan production.
Bryan McDonald
Thanks, Tony.
I’m going to provide detail on our third quarter loan production results starting with our commercial lending group. For the quarter, our commercial teams closed $281 million in new loan commitments. Similar to the $284 million closed last quarter and the $271 million closed in the third quarter of 2021. Please refer to Page 18 in the third quarter investor presentation for additional detail on new originated loans over the past five quarters.
The commercial loan pipeline ended the third quarter at $604 million, up from $537 million last quarter and up from $547 million at the end of the third quarter of 2021. Although the pipeline increased during the quarter, we are seeing more variability in new opportunities, including some customers opting to delay capital spending. This combined with the rapidly rising rate environment is likely to cause the pipeline to soften from here.
Organic loan growth during the quarter was augmented with the purchase of residential mortgage pools and negatively impacted by the run-off of both SBA PPP balances and the indirect loan portfolio, our business line we discontinued in 2020. Excluding the impact of SBA PPP, indirect loan balance declines and the residential mortgage pool purchases provides a good measurement of our core organic loan growth rate.
Using this measurement, loans increased $118 million during the quarter or 12% annualized rate. Similar to the first and second quarter, we benefited from higher utilization rates and lower loan pre-payment and pay offs as compared to 2021. All of which is detailed on slides 19 and 20 of the investor deck.
Consumer loan production, the majority of which are home equity lines of credit, was $30 million during the quarter, which is down from $43 million last quarter and equivalent to the $30 million of production in the third quarter of 2021.
Moving to interest rates. Our average third quarter interest rate for new commercial loans was 4.87%, which is 76 basis points higher than the 4.11% average for last quarter. In addition, the average third quarter rate for all new loans was 4.89%, up 84 basis points from 4.05% last quarter. Although the marketplace continues to be very competitive, we are seeing a portion of the rate increases translate into higher quartered interest rates on new loans.
The mortgage department closed $26 million of new loans in the third quarter of 2022 compared to $40 million closed in the second quarter of 2022 and $44 million in the third quarter of 2021. The mortgage pipeline ended the quarter at $18 million versus $20 million in Q2 and $27 million in the third quarter of 2021. Portfolio loans continued to make up 84% of the year-to-date volume versus 54% in 2021. With interest rates rising, we anticipate volumes will continue at relatively low levels we saw in the third quarter.
I’ll now turn the call back to Jeff.
Jeff Deuel
Thank you, Bryan.
As I mentioned earlier, we’re pleased with our performance in the third quarter and year-to-date. We’re seeing solid organic production across the bank, with deals coming from existing customers and new high quality prospects.
Additionally, we are seeing multiple new business opportunities coming from the new teams and the southern part of our footprint. Based on our current pipeline, we expect Q4 loan production to be similar to Q3, we will continue to focus on expense control, although we are experiencing inflationary pressures around compensation.
We have also continued to focus on our technology strategy, which is designed to support more efficient operations, a more consistent customer experience and positions as well to pivoted technology continues to evolve and we continue to grow. We are also prepared to pursue acquisitions in our three-state region when we see the right opportunities for us. In the meantime, we’ll continue to focus on opportunities to add new teams and individual producers throughout the footprint.
As Don mentioned earlier, our capital levels and our robust liquidity provides us with a strong foundation to address challenges and to take advantage of opportunities. That is the conclusion of our prepared comments.
So, Bethany, we’re ready to open up the call to questions that people may have.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of Eric Spector with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Eric Spector
Just want to say congrats on a great quarter. Just wondering if you could provide an update on the Heritage One development and what’s on the docket to be added near term? And any updates on when you will be able to drive more efficiencies and then just any potential to white label as well would be great. Thanks.
JeffDeuel
Thanks, Eric. We have it–, the technology that we’ve reported on up to this point is comprised of three pieces, there is the CRM, there is the commercial loan origination piece and then there’s the treasury management piece. We’re scheduled to have the first version of the commercial loan origination system completed by the end of March 2023.
The CRM is supposed to be done first version, June and then treasury management, which is the more complicated out the three although they’re all pretty complicated, will be done by September. And we are getting some advantages now because we’ve been using, we started to use all three of them, the commercial loan origination system is the one that’s probably most mature and is used broadly throughout the organization.
The others are being rolled out and we’re working on developing a better way of showing all of you our metrics as to how and what it’s doing for us, but just intuitively, we can see some of the benefits already in the form of being able to do more with the same people is how I’d like to put it. The white label piece of it, interesting you brought that up, I know we’ve talked about that with a few folks, the idea of potentially selling our platform to other banks, which is something that we spent a lot of time on this year, scoping it out and assessing it.
And we recently met with a technology committee of the Board and collectively made the decision to put that idea on the shelf, because we have a lot of liquidity on our balance sheet, we have a lot of new people that we need to focus on and we need to get these platforms to done is how I put it before we potentially get fancy trying to sell. So it’s something that we might consider later in the future, but for now, we’re going to focus inwardly and getting ourselves organized around the technology before we do anything beyond that.
Eric Spector
Okay, that makes a lot of sense. Thanks. And then just kind of going off that, you guys put a lot of, lot of efforts into upgrading your tech stack obviously, and just kind of a broader shift away from branches. I’m just curious how you think about branch consolidations going forward over the next few years?
JeffDeuel
Well, we did what we would call a lot last year and I think going forward, our branches are still very important to us, what you saw was consolidation within markets as opposed to us wanting to leave markets completely. I think what you’ll see is us continuing to refine through any consolidation, but I think it will be more limited number each year compared to last year.
Eric Spector
Okay. And then one last question, just curious how M&A conversations are going? Any increase in appetite given how well your currency has held up relative to peers?
JeffDeuel
Yes. We’re happy to see our currency hold up. We are having the same conversations that we’ve had for the last couple of years. I don’t see any immediate opportunities for us. I think it’s safe to say that folks that we know and like, and would be interested in are aware of our interest. We just try not to overstay our welcome. And I think that also the current environment, with the potential for marks on investment portfolios makes it more complicated too.
So it might be a good thing that we don’t have anything immediate right now. But we’re ready to pursue opportunities when they make sense for us. In the meantime, you know we still have work to do, to continue the welcome of the teams down south and we think there’s going to be additional disruption that might benefit us and we’d like to be prepared and ready for that too. So if anything, maybe late in ’23 but maybe even later than that.
Eric Spector
Okay. That makes a lot of sense. That’s it from me. Thanks and congrats again on a great quarter.
JeffDeuel
Thanks very much.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Rulis with DA Davidson. Please go ahead.
Jeff Rulis
Following up on the expense side, I think you spoke to it a couple of times, a little bit on the high side pf expectations, understandable, I think you had a slug of hires through a full quarter and some inflation pressures. I guess going forward, absent finding a sizable amount of new hires you know just looking to see if that moderate both on inflationary pressures but also investments that you’re making, just trying to get a sense of that expense figure.
JeffDeuel
Yes and I know Don needs to chime in on this, Jeff, but we went through a rather robust reworking of all of our job grades and salary ranges earlier this year and that was all deployed in July. We also did subsequent actions on the front line employees to kind of right size some of the compensation there was done just a few weeks ago.
So some of those things are obviously not going to, we don’t think they’re going to repeat themselves. I think we’re in a good spot now and then we get the added bonus of we’re performing well enough that we’re having to increase our accrual for incentive, which always is a catch 22, I guess, but I think Don has kind of a direct directional number for you, that might help.
Donald Hinson
Jeff, I think looking forward, as we continue to face, you might say inflationary pressures, again like I said, we’ve had some success filling some open positions which earlier in the year when I was guiding a certain range we’re actually falling below that, that was because we had expected to fill positions earlier and we weren’t and now we are. So I think the run rate will be more in the $39 million to $40 million range per quarter going forward.
Of course, that could change. We’re always looking to add production if we find producers or teams or those type of things that could obviously switch. But we’re not looking to actually create new positions in the back – in the backroom. But so the FTE, any fluctuation that will be to just filling open positions.
Jeff Rulis
Okay. And Don, while I’ve got you there, just on the tax rate, its sort of has risen over the course of the year, but you’re kind of mid-pointing it, kind of mid-17.5%, is that a – still a pretty good rate to kind of think about?
Donald Hinson
Yes. Yes, we like to use the year-to-date rate on that because again it gets adjusted for each quarter. So in a quarter, it might be higher because again, our income was up and therefore the tax exempt items have less of an impact. So I think 17.5% is fairly good number.
Jeff Rulis
Got it, okay. And Jeff, lastly, sort of big pictures, so bear with me. Just a regional question, interested in your view of kind of the climate in the Northwest relative to national trends? I think the region has taken its lumps early in the pandemic, but in a number of Northwest banks are putting up pretty solid growth and you’ve got a bunch of above average deposit franchises. Just interested in your view of relative strength that you see in the region that you think are sustainable.
JeffDeuel
Yes, well, I think the biggest thing is we’ve got a pretty diverse economic landscape with a variety of companies that are here. I think that things are pretty good right now, Jeff, as you said, we went through a pretty bleak time when we were in lockdown, but there’s a vibrancy here that’s continued under the surface.
And I think is kind of coming back in many ways, we do have customers we were looking at about a three-year breakeven on that and modeling around what would be our kind of typical production numbers. It was seven kind of lending oriented sales people and then nine deposit oriented sales people. So far there ahead of where we had hoped to be. But of course it’s early again kind of looking at that three year time horizon. I would I would point you to Page 10 of the investor deck at the bottom. There’s two segments on that slide.
One is the Seattle MSA loans and deposits. And then the bottom one is the Portland MSA for loans and deposits, and that’ll be the that’ll be the best spot to watch as we go quarter-to-quarter in terms of the actual growth in loans and deposits. We did see a big jump in deposits from a relative stand point down there in the market and really good loan growth a lot of that was more broad-based than the than the new teams.
Those teams, this is a reminder started at the end of – near the end of the second quarter. But nonetheless we’re in general seeing really nice growth out of that market and continue to produce the slide. So you and others can watch what’s, what the results are.
Jeff Rulis
Yes, that’s very helpful. And can you kind of speak to just the sensitivity of the deposit relationships, that these hires bringing over relative to obviously, the pristine deposit beta that you guys have exhibited so far this cycle?
Donald Hinson
Yes. The deposit base is – it is very similar to what we have targeted as a long-term strategy, it’s relationship oriented, core, core banking relationships that are highly service oriented in terms of what the clients are looking for. So in terms of a match for Heritage, it’s really, it’s really good. It does take time. You know the transition – to transition relationships.
But, but again, the folks we hired had really strong relationships and have and we believe we’ll continue to get opportunities with their prior client base. I’ll say as well as new clients in the market. We’ve seen a lot of that already with sales, a group of sales people, a larger group of sales people without a client base, of course, very active out calling in the market and winning a lot of other opportunities as well. So in terms of the mix, it’s a really good match for Heritage long term deposit strategy, we’re very pleased with what we’re seeing so far.
Jeff Rulis
Okay, great. And maybe just one last question for Don, on the margin outlook going forward. I would imagine the margin expansion can continue to accelerate from here to some degree as the recent fed rate hikes and expected hike later this year works its way through loan yields and so forth. And, but you guys perhaps not seen as much upward deposit cost pressures as other, so Don just any thoughts on just how the margin trajectory into the fourth quarter and into early 2023 as well?
Donald Hinson
Sure, I can see that we’re going to have margin expansion, but not to the extent that we did this last quarter, we’re probably not going to see 50 basis points increase in margin quarter-over-quarter again, but I do see expansion. Obviously, I think we’ve been able to keep our cost deposits down. I think the betas will start kicking in.
We could see betas for the remaining part of the cycle for deposits to be 20% to 30% kind of net range probably, even if we did that over the next six months as far as the rate hikes expected, that would still leave our overall betas lower than prior cycles, which was 15% to 20%, it’s probably 10% to 15% overall, but we’ll start seeing an increase. But the yields, like you say, the floating-rate assets that we have the repricing of loans and investments, that’s really going to, with these rates, the way they are, is really going to help us continue to expand the margin.
Jeff Rulis
Okay, great. I appreciate you guys taking the questions. And for all the color and congrats again on a great quarter.
JeffDeuel
Thanks.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Eleanor Hagan with KBW. Please go ahead.
Eleanor Hagan
Hi, all, congrats on the quarter. Thank you for the question.
JeffDeuel
Good morning, Eleanor. Thanks for joining the call. What can we do for you today?
Eleanor Hagan
So kind of turning back to the, jumping back to about the teams you added in the last quarter. Could you kind of talk about – maybe just talk about sort of the types of teams you brought on and what specialties they have?
JeffDeuel
We can do that, Bryan, do you want to take that one?
Bryan McDonald
Yes, sure, they’re very traditional commercial teams on the lending side, the portfolios were C&I and owner-occupied real estate primarily under our structure, they also have the ability to do some amount of non-owner or investor real estate lending, but in terms of the type of relationships they’ve banked previously, it’s a really strong match to what we do here at Heritage and coming from a– an organization with a release similar approach to credit as Heritage. So, both for say relationships.
They’ve done work with previously, as well as new opportunities that they’re finding in the markets. There’s a really close tie between what these folks have done in the past and what they’re doing here at Heritage. So that’s the lending side on the deposit side are very similar. We have some deposit sales officers here at Heritage that predated the new teams that we picked up back in 2017.
Again a Sales Officer on the, on the deposit side, that’s the equivalent of a commercial bank on the loan side, in terms of experience and seniority. And again, the target client as one that has a high value for service, it’s the operating relationships and then along with that those deposit sales teams. We also added a full complement of servicing teams, which is– which is part of the model to have kind of a one-stop shop for sales on boarding servicing either doing it directly are helping that client base managed to manage in the bank.
So again extensions of what we’re currently doing with some additional augments on the servicing side, which we think we play out well for us and as we go through the year.
Eleanor Hagan
Got it. Thank you. That’s helpful and then jumping around a little bit thinking about loan growth. You are still reduced amount of flexibility, how you thinking about or planning on funding loan growth on a go-forward?
JeffDeuel
Bryan, you want to keep going with that?
Bryan McDonald
Yes. So we have had a really strong focus on deposits sales. We didn’t take the foot off the gas at all, even in the pandemic, as we really saw deposits grow but didn’t have the associated loan growth at the time and that’s one of the reasons we find ourselves in a strong liquidity position that we have today and we’re continuing to have a strong outbound focus on deposits.
Don talked a little bit about deposit pricing and we’re, we’re continuing to work with customers to first, maintain relationships, but we’re also looking to maintain balances within reason, there are some other providers in our market that are paying some higher prices and so we’re having to evaluate that on a customer by customer basis, but certainly keeping relationships and keeping as much of additional deposits that maybe, they don’t need for core operations which of course those are most sensitive to price. So you’ll see us continue to put a very heavy weighting on deposit, deposit growth and look to fund the loans with deposit growth. it’s been a little, we did see a pullback during the quarter.
Don, I think, I think the number was net about little over $90 million and if you dig a little deeper into that, there was about $26 million of it that was associated in some way with public or municipal funds. So some of our, some of our municipalities have the ability to sweep those funds to a state pool that’s investing in securities or bonds that pay a higher rate.
So I think that’s the piece of it that is a little hard to tell how that’s going to play out as we have additional rate hikes, which is usually when we’re getting more feedback from our customers, relative to the rate. So it’s something that we’re watching closely and in really active dialogue with the customers on, but underneath the rate piece of that, we’re continuing to add a lot of new clients.
JeffDeuel
Bryan, you want to add a little bit on loan growth too?
Bryan McDonald
Yes, sure. So we did have a good quarter again on loan growth. And I would just direct everybody to slide 20 in the deck. It’s the best way to get a good view of what’s happening in the bottom. The top section there shows the change in loans and we’re having really similar gross production to what we’ve had in the prior periods. The biggest swing it’s really on the pre payments and payoffs where those average more like $200,000 a quarter.
And in last, last year 2021 in some prior periods, you can see on this slide the pre-payers were $72 million in Q3 and the payoffs were $55 million. So $127 million rather than maybe a couple $100 million we were seeing last year. And then also on the net payments in advances, you can see in Q3, we had $55 million of increases net increases were in 2021. We were, we’re having moderate declines for example in Q4, we had a $31 million decline. So real similar production numbers and then of course a change in the payoff pre-pays. There’s also a slide and Jeff, maybe you can remind me of the page that shows our construction commitment?
JeffDeuel
Yes. 19.
Bryan McDonald
19, that’s also kind of interesting. We’re at $542 million of commitments, again this at the bottom of Slide 19 in the investor deck and if you go back to pre-pandemic, the end of ’19, it was $580 million. So this is also helpful to that, to that loan growth because we bottomed out through 2021 and now of course, this is a source of growth rather than decline.
So we’re in a good position there and continue to have – continue to build total commitments this year again, almost back to where we were in ’19, not quite yet.
JeffDeuel
And also note that $289 million is unfunded commitments, which is loan originations that will come over time.
Eleanor Hagan
Great, thank you. That’s really helpful. I’ll step back.
JeffDeuel
Thanks, Eleanor.
Operator
Thank you. There are no additional questions waiting at this time. I would like to pass the conference back to Jeff Deuel for any closing remarks.
Jeff Deuel
Thanks, Bethany if there’s no more questions, we’ll wrap up this quarter’s earnings call. We thank you for your time, your support and your interest in our ongoing performance and we look forward to talking with many of you in the coming weeks. Thank you, bye.
Operator
There will be a replay available one hour after the conclusion of the call. To access the replay, please dial 1-866-813-9403 and enter the access code 989637. That concludes the Heritage Financial Corporation Q3 2022 earnings call. I hope you all enjoy the rest of your day. You may now disconnect your lines.
Be the first to comment