Fulton Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:FULT) Q1 2022 Earnings Conference Call April 20, 2022 10:00 AM ET
Company Participants
Phil Wenger – Chairman & CEO
Mark McCollom – CFO
Curt Myers – President & COO
Matt Jozwiak – Director, IR
Conference Call Participants
Russell Gunther – D.A. Davidson
Frank Schiraldi – Piper Sandler
Daniel Tamayo – Raymond James
Chris McGratty – Keefe Bruyette & Woods Inc.
Erik Zwick – Boenning & Scattergood Inc.
Matthew Breese – Stephens Inc.
Dave Bishop – Hovde Group, LLC
Operator
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Fulton Financial First Quarter 2022 Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions].
I would now like to hand the conference over to your host today, Matt Jozwiak, Director of Investor Relations.
Matt Jozwiak
Good morning, and thanks for joining us for Fulton Financial’s conference call and webcast to discuss our earnings for the first quarter of 2022. Your host for today’s conference call is Phil Wenger, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Joining Phil are Curt Myers, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Mark McCollom, Chief Financial Officer. Our comments today will refer to the financial information and related slide presentation included with our earnings announcements, which were released yesterday afternoon. These documents can be found on our website at fult.com by clicking on Investor Relations, and then on News. The slides can also be found under the Presentations page under the Investor Relations tab of our Investor Relations website.
On this call, representatives of Fulton may make forward-looking statements with respect to Fulton’s financial condition, results of operations, and business. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, and actual results could differ materially. Please refer to the Safe Harbor statement on forward-looking statements in our earnings release and on Slide 2 of today’s presentation, for additional information regarding these risks, uncertainties, and other factors. Fulton undertakes no obligation other than as required by law to update or revise any forward-looking statements. In discussing Fulton’s performance, representatives of Fulton may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the supplemental financial information included with Fulton’s earnings announcement released yesterday, and Slides 10 and 11 of today’s presentation, for a reconciliation of those non-GAAP financial measures, to the most comparable GAAP measures. Now, I would like to turn the call over to your host, Phil Wenger.
Phil Wenger
Thanks, Matt, and good morning, everyone. After I share a high-level overview of the quarter, Curt will discuss our business performance, and Mark will share the details of our financial performance, and then we would be happy to take your questions. We were pleased with our performance during the first quarter of 2022. We saw solid loan growth in both our consumer and commercial lines of business, despite a very volatile rate environment. And once again, our wealth management business produced record income. Expenses declined in the first quarter, and you’ll hear more detail on that in a few minutes.
We made several announcements in the first quarter. First, we announced our intent to acquire Prudential Bancorp, Inc. later this year. This will be our first bank acquisition in 16 years, though we have acquired some – although we did acquire some small wealth management firms in recent years. As I’ve shared in the past, it is Fulton’s intent to once again be an acquirer of banks that fit our strategy, our geography, and our culture. The Prudential acquisition meets all three of these objectives. As you know, we have identified Philadelphia as a market that offers a lot of opportunity for us, and we have been steadily growing our presence there over the past few years. With the Prudential acquisition, we look forward to bringing our products, expertise, and community-oriented style of banking to more of Philadelphia’s neighborhoods. Also, during the quarter, we raised our quarterly common stock dividend to $0.15 per share, a $0.01 or 7% increase over the previous quarter. And in March, the board approved a new stock repurchase program, authorizing us to repurchase up to $75 million of shares of our stock. Though we are currently not able to repurchase stock due to the upcoming Prudential acquisition, we look forward to pursuing this opportunity later in the year, if it makes financial sense to do so.
And lastly, in March, I announced my intent to retire as Chairman and CEO Fulton, effective December 31, 2022. I’ve shared that it has truly been a privilege and a pleasure to be part of this company for the past 43 years. I look forward to continuing to serve on the holding company and bank boards of directors once my staff role comes to an end. And I’m very pleased that the board has announced that Curt Myers will succeed me, assuming the role of Chairman, CEO, and president, effective January 1, 2023. With Curt at the helm, and the talented members of our senior management team adding their expertise, I am confident that Fulton will be in good hands.
So, now I’ll turn things over to Curt to discuss our business performance.
Curt Myers
Well, thank you, Phil, and good morning. As Phil mentioned, we were pleased with our performance in the first quarter. So, let me share a little detail with you on several key areas. Loan growth exceeded our internal expectations for the quarter. Total loan growth was approximately $290 million, or about 6.4% annualized when excluding PPP loans. We were also pleased with the diversification of our loan production, as most areas experienced solid growth. As a reminder, the loan growth percentages I referenced are on an annualized basis. We experienced strong growth in C&I lending, residential mortgage, commercial and residential construction, leasing, and also with our student lending fintech partnership. Our commercial mortgage portfolio grew modestly, as we saw originations decline from a seasonally high fourth quarter.
Turning to provide more detail on consumer lending business, consumer loan balances grew $120 million or 8.5%. This was primarily driven by 10.4% growth in residential mortgages. We also saw double digit growth in residential construction and our student lending portfolio. Residential mortgage originations for the quarter were $465 million, a decrease of 20% from the prior quarter, and a decrease of 35% from the prior year. Purchase originations of $353 million, accounted for approximately 76% of total residential mortgage originations during the quarter. At March 31, the mortgage pipeline was $439 million, up 18% from year-end, as we approach the traditional home-buying season. Residential construction mortgages continued to grow double digits and contributed nicely to our overall loan growth. This quarter, residential construction growth was $16 million or 31%. This growth is seasonal and is in line with our expectations. As I mentioned the past two quarters, our recent fintech partnership for student loan refinance business, continues to progress nicely, with $11 million of originations during the quarter.
Now, let me provide a little more detail on commercial lending. The commercial loan portfolio grew $170 million or 5.5%, a seasonally strong quarter. C&I loan growth accelerated, increasing $85 million or 8.8% versus 4.5% growth last quarter. Increased originations, as well as increased line utilization, combined with a decline in paydowns, drove this growth. I would note that we have seen increases in line balances for the third consecutive quarter. Commercial line utilization ended the quarter at 23%, up from the low point of 20% in the second quarter of 2021. This has generated approximately $150 million in growth in outstandings over the past three quarters. As a reminder, commercial line utilization was 32% as of the first quarter of 2020. As a result, we see growth opportunity as line utilization migrates to more historical levels. Also contributing nicely, commercial construction loans grew $54 million or 23%, driven by increased advances during the quarter. Commercial mortgages grew at a modest $10 million or 0.6%. Originations declined from a seasonally elevated fourth quarter. However, remain in line with the first three quarters of 2021. Offsetting the seasonal decline in originations, was an equal decline in prepayments and paydowns. After two strong quarters of originations, our commercial pipeline continues to rebuild and remain solid. Overall, we were pleased with our loan growth to start the year.
Turning to deposits, we saw a modest decline in deposits for the quarter, driven by a decrease in certain interest-bearing products, partially offset by continued growth in non-interest-bearing products. Total deposit balances declined $32 million or 0.6%. And our mix continues to migrate toward lower cost or non-interest-bearing products. During the quarter, we maintained our cost of deposits at 11 basis points, and our excess cash position gives us strategic flexibility as we consider multiple rising rate scenarios.
Moving to our fee business, we were pleased with many of our business lines. Our wealth management business delivered another record quarter, and cash management revenues continue to grow nicely. Despite these positive results, we did experience pressure in residential mortgage banking and capital markets. First, our wealth management business continues to grow. Our strong sales effort, client retention, and a cumulative effect of several small acquisitions, continue to drive customer growth. Despite these efforts, we did see assets under management and administration decline as markets have declined on a linked-quarter basis. assets under management and administration declined to $13.8 billion, down from $14.6 billion at year-end. However, they remain up from $13.1 billion at the end of the year ago period.
Turning to our commercial lines of business. Total fees declined $2.5 million, down 6% versus the year ago period. This is driven by seasonality and some transactional businesses. Cash management grew 8.4% linked-quarter annualized, and was up 10% versus the year ago period, as we see business activity continue to expand. Offsetting cash management with near-term pressure in capital markets or our commercial swap fee program, lower SBA gain on sale fees, and seasonal declines in merchant fees. Capital markets and SBA revenues will exhibit modest volatility throughout the year. Swap fees were impacted by decline in activity, as some customers have turned their preference to direct fixed rate loan structures, and these pressures are swap income. SBA gain on sale fees declined linked-quarter after coming off a record ‘21. However, our SBA pipeline remains solid. As a reminder, this SBA income is separate from the PPP program and is generated by our dedicated SBA team.
Turning to our consumer banking line of business, we did see pressure during the quarter led by decline in mortgage banking revenue. While residential mortgage applications and the pipeline were up during the quarter, originations and gain on sale margins declined, leading to a quarter-over-quarter decline in fee income. With interest rates moving higher, the remaining portion of our mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance was reversed, and Mark will talk about that a little later. Overall, residential banking fee income was down $2.7 million linked-quarter. In addition to mortgage banking fee income, consumer transactional fees were down 3.1% linked-quarter, or 12.7% annualized, as customer activity experienced an unexpected seasonal decline.
Finally, moving to credit, asset quality continues to remain solid. Delinquency remains low despite a modest uptick during the quarter. Non-performing loans remain within a narrow range, and we experienced net recoveries for the quarter. Net recoveries of $1.1 million in the first quarter, compares to $3 million or seven basis points of annualized net charge-offs in the fourth quarter of ’21, and seven basis points of net charge-offs for all of 2021. Our first quarter provision for credit losses was a negative $7 million versus a negative $5 million provision in the fourth quarter of 2021. This is our fifth consecutive quarter of negative provision. The allowance for credit losses, excluding PPP loans, stands at 1.33%. As always, our allowance for credit loss trends could change in future periods based on new loan origination volumes, loan mix, net charge-off activity, and longer-term economic projections. Overall, our credit outlook remains stable, with no material change in our current trends.
Now, I’ll turn a call over to Mark to discuss our financial results and our outlook in a little more detail.
Mark McCollom
Great. Thank you, Curt, and good morning to everyone on the call. Unless I note otherwise, the quarterly comparisons I will discuss are with the fourth quarter of 2021. Starting on Slide 3, earnings per diluted share this quarter were $0.38 on net income available to common shareholders of $61.7 million. This is up from $0.37 in the prior quarter. Our first quarter performance included a decline in net interest income and non-interest income, a negative provision for credit losses, and a decline in operating expenses, and I’ll cover each of these in more detail later in my comments.
Moving to Slide 4, our net interest income was $161 million, a $5 million decline linked-quarter. This was primarily due to a $6 million linked-quarter decrease in fees earned from PPP loan forgiveness. This decrease was offset by solid loan growth, a modest increase in yields on earning assets, and a modest decline in interest expense. With respect to our PPP program, at the end of the fourth quarter, we had $301 million of outstanding PPP loans, and $8 million of unearned fees. During the first quarter, PPP loan forgiveness was $137 million, and the fees earned on that were $4 million, down from $10 million in the fourth quarter. So, at March 31 then, we have $164 million of PPP loans still in our books, with approximately $4 million of loan fees yet to be recognized.
Turning to the investment portfolio, balances grew modestly during the period, increasing $121 million to end the quarter at $4.3 billion. With a sharp increase in rates, we did put some of our excess cash to work. However, we remain measured in our approach to deploying excess cash into investment securities. Turning to deposits, total deposits declined approximately $32 million on an ending balance basis. As Curt noted, our cost of deposits for the quarter remained low at 11 basis points. During the quarter, we saw increases in non-interest-bearing and savings deposits, offset by decreases in certain interest-bearing categories, as well as time deposits for the net decline of $32 million. Our ending loans and deposit ratio increased from 84.9% for the first quarter to 85.8% in the first quarter, primarily due to increased loans outstanding. Our net interest margin for the first quarter was 2.78% versus 2.77% in the fourth quarter. The one basis point increase linked-quarter, resulted primarily from an improvement in the mix of earning assets, interest-earning assets, higher loan yields, and stable deposit costs, partially offset by a decline in PPP loan fee recognition.
Turning to Slide 6, on non-interest income, I’ll provide some additional detail on the business results Curt just discussed. Wealth management continued to deliver a good quarter despite volatility in the market. Our mortgage banking revenues declined and resulted from a decrease in loan sales and a decline in gain on sales spreads, which were 161 basis points this quarter, versus 174 basis points last quarter. We also recorded a reduction to the valuation allowance for our mortgage servicing rights asset of $600,000 due to higher interest rates and slower prepayment speeds. Our MSR asset was $35.6 million at March 31. At quarter end, there are no mortgage servicing rights valuation allowances remaining. O0ther fee income decreased $4.2 million on a linked-quarter basis. Last quarter included gains of $3.8 million from equity method investments, as our investment in a fintech fund generated very strong returns during that quarter.
Moving to Slide 7, non-interest expenses were approximately $146 million in the fourth quarter, down $8 million linked-quarter. This decline was driven by the following factors. Total salaries and benefits were down $1 million linked-quarter, driven by certain one-time incentives and bonuses in the fourth quarter totaling $3.6 million. This was partially offset by increases in first quarter salary costs, payroll taxes, increased incentive compensation, and lower FAS 91 deferrals due to a declining mortgage banking market. Also contributing to the linked-quarter decline and expenses were lower outside services costs due to the timing of certain technology projects in the fourth quarter, resulting in a $1.5 million linked-quarter decline. And lastly, we reported a $4.7 million decline in other expenses, primarily due in part to a $2.2 million decrease in charitable contributions linked-quarter, and a net gain on fixed asset sales of $1.5 million recorded in the first quarter.
Slide 8 provides more detail on our capital ratios. At March 31, we maintained solid cushions over the regulatory minimums, and our bank and parent company liquidity both remain very strong. With a significant increase in interest rates during the quarter, accumulated other comprehensive income swung from a positive $27 million to a negative $159 million during the quarter. This swing impacted both our tangible common equity ratio, as well as our tangible book value per share by 68 basis points and $1.16 per share, respectively. During the quarter, we did not repurchase any shares. And as Phil mentioned, our board approved another $75 million share repurchase authorizing expiring at year-end. Given the pending acquisition of Prudential Bancorp, we won’t be repurchasing any shares prior to the closing, which is anticipated to be in the third quarter.
On Slide 9, we’re providing updated guidance for 2022. A lot has obviously changed in the macroeconomic environment over the past three months. Our guidance now assumes a total of 150 basis points of Fed funds increases occurring as follows. The 25 basis points previously announced in March, 50 basis points in May, and 25 basis points in each of June, July, and September. Based on this rate forecast, our revised guidance is as follows. We expect our net interest income on a non-tax equivalized basis, to be in the range of $690 million to $705 million. We expect our non-interest income, excluding securities gains, to be in the range of $225 million to $235 million. We expect operating expenses to be in the range of $595 million to $605 million for the year. And lastly, we expect our effective tax rate to be in the range of 17% to 17.5% for the full year. This guidance excludes the impact of the Prudential transaction, which is expected to close in the third quarter. We will incorporate the impact of Prudential in future guidance that we provide.
Many of you look at pre-provision net revenue, or PPNR, as a key metric to assess the profitability of core operations. Our version of this metric is included in the financial tables of our press release. We’d also like to point out a couple of additional items for you to consider as you assess our PPNR results. Our PPP fees earned have declined $6 million from the fourth quarter to the first quarter. MSR evaluation allowance adjustments resulted in an additional $600,000 decrease in the valuation allowance in the first quarter. And when removing the impact of these two items, we believe our PPNR has shown improvements since the first quarter of 2021 as a result of our first quarter 2021 balance sheet restructuring, earning asset growth over the past year, core margin stabilization, and fee income business growth. Additionally, our asset-sensitive balance sheet is positioned to benefit from anticipated rate increases in 2022 and beyond.
With that, I’ll now turn the call over to the operator for questions. Justin?
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operators Instructions]. And our first question comes from Russell Gunther from D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open.
Russell Gunther
Hey, good morning, guys. Wanted to follow up on the loan growth discussion, very healthy result this quarter and diversified. As you guys look out through the remainder of 2022, could you give us a sense for how you expect that to progress, both from a mix and magnitude perspective? And then just bigger picture, kind of characterize the operating environment from a growth perspective, more stable or is there any concern for softness in the back half of the year?
Curt Myers
Yes. Thanks, Russell. This is Curt. I’ll answer that question for you. So, as we look at our loan growth, we were happy with first quarter loan growth. I think we’re off to a good start. As you look at the consumer business, I think consumer business will be a steady growth contributor for the remainder of the year. We see it becoming more diversified. We had really relied on residential mortgage growth in consumer, and we see that becoming more diversified. And we have less prepay headwinds as we look forward. So, we think consumer will be a good steady performer as we look forward. On the commercial side, we had good origination activity again last quarter. Our pipeline is stable, even with that – the good origination activity.
The growth is diversified in geography and in product. So, we are encouraged by that, and we do expect that to continue as we look at our pipeline, and we have the added tailwind of line utilization. We referenced those in the script and we think that’s going to continue to be a growth supporter as we look forward. The final thing I’d say on loan growth is, we’ve been adding talent. So, we added a team in DC. We’ve added a government services team, and we added a team in Southeast PA. so, with those additions that are pretty recent, they’re going to give growth opportunities in that second half of the year. So, we think we’re positioned well in our outlooks that we can meet the targets that we had set out.
Russell Gunther
Okay, great. Thank you, guys, for that. And then just one more question for me on the fee income guidance and the revision there. Could you just give us a sense in terms of what’s driving that dialed-back expectations and where you expect the fee income growth to be more concentrated this year?
Curt Myers
Yes, it’s Curt, again. I’ll let Mark follow up. Two key headline items are the swap business, given the rate environment, is going to be choppy. We were expecting increases in that year-over-year, and we’re probably kind of flat to last year, hopefully flat to last year. So, that’s a headwind for us. And then the mortgage business. Rates went up quicker than we thought. The mortgage business in the first quarter was softer than we thought, but we have a purchase money-driven shop, and we think we continue to perform going forward. Those are the two key headwinds that we have in fee income.
Russell Gunther
Okay, great. Well, that’s it for me, guys. Thanks very much.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Frank Schiraldi from Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.
Frank Schiraldi
Good morning. Just wondering if you guys could – to follow up on the guide, talk a little bit about the updated expense guide. Is that just strictly inflationary pressures, or what’s kind of the driver there for that adjustment for the full year, especially given the good start or the strong start on expenses in 1Q?
Phil Wenger
Yes. I would say Frank, it’s almost entirely related to inflation and the effects of that in multiple categories. That’ll be it.
Frank Schiraldi
Okay. And just thoughts on how the near-term rate hikes play out in terms of the deposit picture, in terms of balances and deposit costs. Mark, you mentioned the mix shift in the quarter on the deposit side. Any updated thoughts as to betas here and/or potential runoff in the coming quarters?
Mark McCollom
Yes. We saw in the first quarter, Frank, even a stronger shift than we had anticipated to non-interest bearing. So, we have a much higher percentage of non-interest bearing DDAs than we had if you go back to kind of 2015 and the start of the last uprate cycle. So, when you combine a higher percentage of non-interest bearing DDA, and also just still sitting generally right now, somewhere in the $800 million range day-to-day and overnight cash, it gives us strategic flexibility as we think about what those betas will be. But I mean, at the end of the day, we’re a customer-centric organization, and we’re going to make sure that we increase rates in a way that’s going to hold on to all of our key customers. But we do expect betas – if you look through the last cycle, our beta was just a little bit north of 30% through the cycle. And we think that there’s going to be opportunities at least early one here, to be at a slower pace than what we were in the last uprate cycle because of the composition of our balance sheet.
Frank Schiraldi
Okay. All right, great. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Daniel Tamayo from Raymond James. Your line is now open.
Daniel Tamayo
Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Just first, I wanted to confirm what you guys said that the guidance in the slide deck does not include any of the numbers from Prudential. Is that correct?
Mark McCollom
That’s correct, Danny. It does not. Yes, we’ll be providing those next quarter. We’ll start incorporating that into the guide.
Daniel Tamayo
Got it. Okay. So, adding on a quarter and change whenever that field closes. Has anything changed at this point in terms of – I know you’re going to provide guidance next quarter, but has anything changed with the way you’re thinking about accretion related to the deal with the rate environment changing?
Mark McCollom
No, it hasn’t, Danny. Our existing guide that we gave back when we announced the deal for the relative accretion of that acquisition has stayed the same at this point.
Daniel Tamayo
Got it. Okay. And then just maybe a clarification on the NII guidance. Does that include – you’ve still got excess cash levels. You talked about that giving you flexibility. They did come down in the first quarter as well. Does the guidance include a normalization of excess cash levels at all, or how is that included in the guidance?
Mark McCollom
Yes. So, in that guide does assume that there’s going to be some level of normalization. I would say that by the end of this year, we still have excess cash than what we held historically sort of pre-pandemic, but it does assume that there would be a gradual normalization, which is really more a function of loan growth. And if we have continued loan growth, then obviously we’d rather put our cash to use that way than in securities or overnight cash.
Daniel Tamayo
Okay, great. And then finally, just on reserves, just curious what your updated thoughts are on where those may move from here, given expectation for higher rates and potentially higher losses down the road? Thanks.
Mark McCollom
You’re talking about loan loss provision, correct? Danny, are you still on the line? Did we lose him?
Operator
No, sir. He’s not on the line.
Phil Wenger
We lost him.
Mark McCollom
We lost him. All right.
Phil Wenger
Still answer the question.
Mark McCollom
Yes. So, for others who might be interested in his question, so we don’t give specific guidance on our loan loss provision. But obviously we’ve had a very benign credit environment. And as folks know, with CECL, the amount of provision that we have on the books today in theory is a sufficient allowance for credit loss to cover all credit losses that we may incur in the future. So, our future, unless that economic outlook changes, then the only thing that would really impact our provision levels going forward would be loan growth.
Phil Wenger
And with that …
Operator
Thank you.
Phil Wenger
Yes. We’ll go to the next question. I guess Danny is not on.
Operator
Okay. Our next question comes from Chris McGratty from KBW. Your line is now open.
Chris McGratty
Hey, good morning. Mark, I wanted to just to revisit the balance sheet growth for a second. Obviously, deposit projections are very hard, given all the dynamics out there today. How should we be thinking about the Fed taper and just the size of earning assets? I’m trying to get a sense of appetite to add-ons, reduce cash. I know it’s a function of deposit growth, but if I just took a step back and think over the next 12 to 18 months, what’s the size of the earning asset base in your projections?
Mark McCollom
Yes. So, as you think of overall earning assets, I mean, for us, our overnight cash position at some point over the next six to eight quarters, is going to be entirely replaced by loans, right? So, I mean, that’s really where – our investment portfolio, we’ve stayed pretty consistent over the years at roughly 15% of our total assets. I don’t see that changing more than a couple of percentage points. And we’re willing to be patient to allow that to come back in the loan growth as opposed to just grossing up the loan portfolio right now.
Chris McGratty
Okay. And then in terms of what you may be buying in the bond book, what kind of yield pickup are you experiencing relative to the blended yield in the first quarter?
Mark McCollom
In the 40-basis point range.
Chris McGratty
Okay. All right. Great. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Erik Zwick from Boenning & Scattergood. Your line is now open.
Erik Zwick
Thanks. Good morning, guys. How are you? First one for me, wondering if you can just remind me in terms of how you kind of bill or charge for the wealth management fees, just given the decline in AUM balances quarter-over-quarter. Are those billed in arrears or kind of based on average balances? Just trying to get a sense of where that might trend going forward, given kind of recent market dynamics.
Curt Myers
Yes, Erik, it’s Curt. So, there’s – we have different business lines in wealth management, so the billing is a little different, but a bulk of our business is recurring fee, based on assets under management levels and portfolio levels. So, it’s a good solid business on recurring fees, and we typically bill quarter-end looking forward. So, we would see assets down a little bit. There’d be a little pressure on revenue as we look forward, but again, we continue to grow the business, customers, and adding assets too.
Erik Zwick
Thanks, Curt. Appreciate that color there. And just kind of a broader question, not specific to this quarter’s earnings or the outlook, but I’m curious if you could provide some commentary into your current ESG positioning and initiatives, given the proposals for enhanced regulatory disclosures?
Phil Wenger
Yes. So, we’re working very hard at understanding what reporting requirements we’ll have going forward. We will be, over the next couple of weeks, issuing our first corporate social responsibility report. We are paying a lot of attention to being – managing that appropriately. Internally, we have climate task force working diligently so that we can navigate the business impact as we move forward. So, we feel we are making the effort necessary to understand where we need to be and to make positive impact.
Erik Zwick
Great. I look forward to looking at the upcoming report. Thanks. That’s all I had.
Phil Wenger
We’ll make sure you get it.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Matthew Breese from Stephens Inc. Your line is now open.
Matthew Breese
Good morning. Hey, just on the NII forecast, so you now have 125 basis points of additional Fed hikes in your model through year-end versus 50 basis points last quarter. And it feels very much like today the Fed funds could increase as much as 200, 220 basis points by the end of the year. So, if we were to get more than you expect, 200 versus the 125, how does the NII outlook change?
Mark McCollom
Well, it would definitely go up. And for us then obviously, as each incremental 25 comes on, you would probably likely see a little bit more of a deposit beta corresponding with that. But the rough numbers, Matt, which I think you’re aware of, we have roughly $10 billion of loans that are tied to either prime LIBOR or SOFR that are unhedged. We have about a little over $1 billion, but then $1 billion that are already hedged back to fixed. So, you take that incremental impact on NII, that’s about $25 million give or take for each 25-basis point rate move, offset by whatever that deposit beta would be.
Matthew Breese
Okay. And has there been any movement in spot deposit prices yet? Have you changed your offered rates or core rate – core base rates at this point?
Mark McCollom
No.
Phil Wenger
Not in any product.
Matthew Breese
Got it. Okay. In your prepared remark, you’d mentioned historical C&I utilization rates. I think you’d mentioned 32% versus kind of like the low 20% range today. If you were to get back to 32%, what would that be on today’s book in terms of incremental loan growth, and over what kind of timeframe do you think we can get back there?
No.
Phil Wenger
Yes. So, it’s probably north of $500 million and two things. So, we’re 23%. Historical normal average is about 32%. But over the past couple of years, we’ve really grown the business as well. So, our commitments and line commitments are up. So, we think we have upside to get to historical average of between $500 million and $700 million from where we stand right now. The pace that that will occur, we do think that will accelerate. We’ve pretty much moved up 1% each quarter the last three quarters. And we do think that that pace will increase, but we’re not sure how much that will increase, but I think we will see an increasing pace over the next quarters.
Matthew Breese
Okay. Going to the mortgage business, how much of the $465 million originated this quarter was retained versus sold? And has the recent hike in mortgage rates changed thinking at all in terms of what you’re originating for sale versus holding on the books?
Mark McCollom
Yes, let me grab the numbers there. Yes. I’ll just need to look here really quickly. I can’t find that on my fingertips, but I can tell you, as we think about how much we’re going to retain, there was only a nominal amount of sort of saleable product that we kept on the books this past quarter. It was roughly $30 million. So – but we would consider, obviously with increasing commercial business, that over time, it might make more sense for us to just sell some of that remaining product as well. That’s currently under consideration.
Matthew Breese
Okay. Last one for me. You touched on the reserve, but I was just curious in terms of the CECL process, obviously this quarter there were two kind of opposite direction items. You had the Russia-Ukraine conflict increasing, but you also have COVID items declining. Could you just talk about the inputs and outputs and how those items impacted the thought process around reserve and provisioning?
Mark McCollom
Yes, so, we, like a lot of mid-sized banks, rely on Moody’s and for their base economic forecast. So, Moody’s obviously has a team of economists who think about all those different macroeconomic factors, and that produces their base output, as well as their different stress scenarios that we look at as well.
Matthew Breese
Got it. Okay. That’s all I had. I’ll leave it there. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Dave Bishop from Hovde Group. Your line is now open.
Dave Bishop
Yes. Thank you. Good morning, gentlemen. Thank you very much. Hey, Mark, I think you talked about some of the targets longer term in terms of the investment securities portfolio, maybe centering around that 15% range. How should we view about the excess liquidity at this point in cash and then overnight liquidity from a dollar percent of assets basis where you see that sort of normalizing over the longer term?
Mark McCollom
Yes. Pre-pandemic, David, we were between $50 million and $100 million a night, is kind of where we like to run our overnight cash. That number has been as high during the pandemic as $1.3 billion, $1.4 billion. It’s down right now at about $800 million. And again, we’ve been reluctant to go much above that 15% of assets in the investment portfolio. So, we’ve just been sitting that in overnight cash, which is obviously only a little bit more today than it was a month ago. But we’re going to stay patient, and with the forecast for loan growth here over the next three quarters, what I’d expect to see by the end of the year, we’d still be a little bit higher than that historic level, but then sometime in ‘23, we probably revert back to historic levels.
Dave Bishop
Got it. And then one final question. I think you noted in the preamble, the increase in cash management fees, up nicely on a year-over-year basis. any change in terms of fee structure or pricing on that product, or that just represents just better commercial account penetration? Thanks.
Phil Wenger
Yes, it’s really growth in customers and as well as just growth in activity.
Dave Bishop
Great. Thank you.
Operator
And thank you. And I am showing no further question. I would now like to turn the call back over to Phil Wenger, CEO, for closing remarks.
Phil Wenger
Well, thank you, everyone, again for joining us today, and we hope you’ll be able to be with us when we discuss second quarter results in July.
Operator
This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Be the first to comment