First Capital Real Estate Investment Trust (OTC:FCXXF) Q4 2022 Earnings Conference Call February 8, 2023 2:00 PM ET
Company Participants
Alison Harnick – Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
Adam Paul – President & Chief Executive Officer
Neil Downey – Executive Vice President, Enterprise Strategies & Chief Financial Officer
Jordan Robins – Chief Operating Officer
Conference Call Participants
Sam Damiani – TD Securities
Mario Saric – Scotiabank
Pammi Bir – RBC Capital Markets
Gaurav Mathur – iA Capital Markets
Dean Wilkinson – CIBC
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the First Capital REIT Q4 2022 Results Conference Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]
I would like to turn the conference over to Alison. Please proceed with your presentation.
Alison Harnick
Thank you, and good afternoon everyone. In discussing our financial and operating performance and in responding to your questions during today’s call, we may make forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our current estimates and assumptions, many of which are beyond our control and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements.
A summary of these underlying assumptions, risks and uncertainties is contained in our various securities filings, including our MD&A for the year ended December 31st, 2022, and our current AIF, which are available on SEDAR and our website. These statements are made as of today’s date and except as required by securities law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any such statements.
During today’s call, we will also be referencing certain financial measures that are non-IFRS measures. These do not have standardized meanings prescribed by IFRS and should not be construed as alternatives to net income or cash flow from operating activities determined in accordance with IFRS.
Management provides these measures as a complement to IFRS measures to aid in assessing the REIT’s performance. These non-IFRS measures are further defined and discussed in our MD&A, which should be read in conjunction with this call.
I’ll now turn the call over to Adam.
Adam Paul
Thank you very much, Alison. Good afternoon, everyone. And thank you for joining us today for our year-end earnings conference call.
In addition to Alison, with me today are several members of the FCR team including Neil Downey and Jordi Robins, who you will hear from shortly.
I’ll start with First Capital’s announcement yesterday as part of the Board’s ongoing strategic approach to refreshment and plan Chair succession process. Bernie McDonell, who was given over 15 years of service to First Capital is retiring. Bernie has contributed so much to this company and I’d like to personally thank him for his many contributions, but also for his leadership and stewardship, initiating, and throughout the transition process.
Paul Douglas, who is retiring from his role as Group Head of Canadian Business Banking at TD Bank Group, and who has been an Independent Trustee on our Board since 2019 is our new Chair.
Joining the Board is Ira Gluskin. Both Paul and Ira have tremendous experience in both the capital markets and the real estate industry, which will be of great value to First Capital. I know all of us on the FCR team are excited to leverage their respective experience.
Consistent with this approach, the Board will continue, as it always has, with ongoing Board renewal and enhancement. This is an exciting time for First Capital and despite the challenges caused by macro-economic factors, First Capital’s efforts to surface value have been working, which is a fitting segue into our quarterly and annual results.
2022 was a year of progress for FCR. Operationally, the impact of the pandemic proved to be behind us. Once again, our operating metrics and property level performance in Q4 were both very solid.
Year started out with continued stability, but that shortly changed by the end of Q1 with inflation and consequently interest rates rising rapidly. This created a lot of volatility in the capital markets across our sector, from which we were not immune.
We stayed focused on our portfolio and the important strategy work that was underway and plan. In May, we announced an NCIB in order for the REIT to take advantage of the major disconnect between the intrinsic value of FCR for NAV and our unit price.
To the benefit of all unit holders, we acquired and cancelled 6.2 million trust units in 2022, for just over $94 million, resulting in a weighted average cost per unit of $15.14. This capital was funded entirely from retained operating cash flow and property dispositions.
In September, we followed through on our promise to unitholders and announced the full restoration of our distribution. This was planned for nearly two years and fulfils the pledge we made to unit holders in early 2021.
The decision to restore the distribution was straightforward as we outlined last quarter. Most importantly, given our tax profile, we had virtually no flexibility other than to restore the distribution without compromising our REIT status.
I’d like to reiterate, once again, that the restored distribution is fully covered by our operating cash flow, after deducting all maintenance CapEx, all leasing CapEx, all revenue sustaining CapEx, and even revenue enhancing CapEx.
From a capital allocation perspective, this is very important, because it allows for 100% of disposition proceeds under our plan to be allocated to several potential options, which I will discuss shortly. But the distribution is not one of them, given our operating cash flow fully covers it.
For several years now, including throughout 2022, our team has worked hard to advance our very deep density pipeline. As a result of this work, passion, expertise and sweat equity, we now have an abundance of low or no yielding assets that are primed for either development or monetization.
So far, we have rezoned over 8.6 million square feet of space, with another nine million square feet that is currently underway, and many of Canada’s most desirable neighborhoods.
While these types of assets have and are expected to continue contributing to NAV growth, the cumulative impact of this sizable development pipeline has created a drag on EBITDA and FFO, while also adversely impacting our debt metrics.
As a public company, striking the right balance is a key. Given the success of our value, creating strategies in these types of assets, our portfolio composition today is overweight long term development opportunities for a public company.
Following months of work last year by management and the board on how best to unlock the value we’ve created over the past few years, we announced the details of our enhanced capital allocation and portfolio optimization plan toward the end of the third quarter.
Executing this plan ensures that our capital is allocated in ways that drive the most value for unit holders over the short, medium and long term. It will also rebalance FCRs portfolio to a higher proportion of income producing assets that contribute to key metrics such as EBITDA and FFO. And it will further strengthen our balance sheet, which remains a very important element of our plan that our board and management team are fully committed to.
Earlier I noted that our operating cash flow more than covers our distribution. Therefore, the entire $1 billion of monetizations will be allocated to a variety of other uses. Specifically, at least $400 million will be used to repay outstanding debt. This will have a positive impact on our debt metrics, especially debt to EBITA, given the relatively minimal EBITA we will be selling under this plan.
But the transaction’s completed in Q4. We have already seen the initial impact of this in our quarterly results, with debt to EBITDA improving by 70 basis points from Q3 to 10.2 times, while at the same time meaningfully growing FFO per unit. This is exactly the combination that our plan is designed to deliver.
Roughly another $400 million dollars is anticipated to be invested in value enhancing development assets over the next two years. That is accumulative numbers. The remainder will be allocated in the most optimal and impactful means, which will be assessed and determined as our sales progress.
Options include further debt reduction, NCIB purchases, opportunistic real estate investments consistent with our strategy, and other opportunities that we identify. Our plan remains on track. In addition to King High Line, just before your end, we also closed on a partial interest in our Young and Roselawn development site.
In 2022, we closed on a total of $277 million of dispositions at an average premium to IFRS NAV equal to 15%. We are keenly aware of the high quality nature of our portfolio today. We also know that there continues to be capital seeking investment in great assets. Consequently, we expect and required stronger premium pricing for the assets we are selling.
We have a track record of achieving this through various cycles and events, including through more challenging times, such as the past few years. Between 2020 through 2020, a time period which captures both the pandemic and rising interest rates, we sold $874 million of properties at an average premium to IFRS NAV equal to 17%.
Now, the current market is most constructive for smaller transactions versus very large ones, which is where we are currently focused and works well for our plan. It’s important to balance transparency to unitholders, while ensuring we retain as much leverage as possible with prospective purchasers as we negotiate transactions.
So in that regard, it’s not prudent for us to provide the full list of properties that comprise our plan. We do look forward to providing additional disclosure as appropriate, but to give some color of the initial billion dollar pool, following the two sales in Q4, we have 28 assets remaining that have an average value of roughly $30 million.
Most are development sites, none are multi-tenant grocery-anchored centers, and no sale, or even the aggregate of the billion dollar pool materially changes the composition of our primarily grocery-anchored portfolio, nor our long term growth trajectory. But they are expected to meaningfully impact the key metrics, our plan is designed to deliver.
We continue to make good progress with several properties under conditional agreement, several under negotiation and others that are being ready, which are primed for sale. We look forward to reporting on these in the future as they progress.
Now Neil will walk through the details of the quarter but to summarize the quality of our portfolio and the strategic decisions we have made really came through in our fourth quarter results.
Same property NOI growth, lease renewal lifts and FFO per unit growth were all very solid. Importantly, we achieved this while also improving our debt to EBITDA. A powerful combination of FFO per unit growth while at the same time improving debt to EBITDA is a key objective of our plan.
Leasing was solid once again, with a million square feet of leasing across 231 transactions have very healthy rent increases. This contributed to our average in place net rental rate nearly breaching $23 per square foot, setting another all time high for the 26th quarter in a row.
Dori will provide a more detailed update on our investment activity. But needless to say, we’ve been busy with some amazing work done by Dori’s team, which we expect will continue to positively impact NAV as we execute. Growth 2022, we continue to advance our ESG priorities, further embedding environmental, social and governance principles into our business and culture.
But first and update on our carbon reduction planning. Rooting and practical plans today but focused on the future our 2030 greenhouse gas emissions reduction target of 46% has been approved by the science based target initiative with our longer term goal of reaching net zero by 2050.
To reach these ambitious goals FCR is actively working on asset level greenhouse gas reduction plans that include operational efficiencies, retrofit initiatives, tenant engagement, and renewable energy generation, among other things. We know that getting to net zero cannot be done in isolation. We need collaboration in partnership with our national tenants and industry peers to achieve our common goal of net zero.
To that end, in November, we hosted an inaugural collaboration for Climate Action Forum for solutions focused discussion and planning around decarbonization of retail building in Canada. We intend to continue to engage with foreign participants on this important ongoing initiative.
As part of our corporate accountabilities last year, we encourage our employees to volunteer at least one day towards a charity that matters to them. We set a target of 75% participation. Thanks to the passion of our team to support the communities where we operate, we exceeded that target with 82% participation.
In addition to our volunteering efforts, the FCR thriving neighborhood foundation team raised close to $200,000 in support of kids helpful. I would like to personally thank our employees, our Board members and our corporate friends who continue to support our foundation.
When I look back over 2022, we have made significant progress on our ED&I initiatives and our ESG roadmap. And we look forward to providing more updates on ESG in the future. But in the meantime, please visit the ESG section of our website for regular updates.
So, overall, a very busy year and fourth quarter with healthy operating metrics, solid earnings growth and a stronger balance sheet. Before I pass it over to Neil, I’ll comment on the special meeting requisition. For the last few months, as we always do, we have engaged closely with many of our unitholders. We believe now more than ever, that the optimization plan is the right path forward. First Capital has a credible and executable plan that delivers enhanced earnings growth, while at the same time strengthening our balance sheet.
Management and the Board unanimously support this plan and are excited to continue executing it and delivering its benefits to unitholders. I firmly agree with our new chair and every member of our Board that we have the right plan at the right time with the right team to continue to execute it.
And with that, I will now pass things over to Neil.
Neil Downey
Thanks, Adam, and good afternoon to all of our call participants. As is customary with my prepared remarks today, I will refer to our quarterly conference called presentation, which is available on our website at fcr.ca.
From my perspective, the three themes within First Capital’s Q4 results are; number one, leasing remains strong. Secondly, the REITs financial results continue their solid underlying growth trends. And thirdly, First Capital continues to make significant progress in improving key leverage metrics, including a step function decrease in Q4 debt-to-EBITDA and this leverage reduction has been achieved while also growing underlying FFO per unit and maintaining very strong liquidity.
Now let’s review some of the details behind the results starting with slide 6. At the bottom line, Q4 2022 funds from operations of $80.5 million increased by 32% from $60.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. Aided by a lower unit count related to our unit repurchase programmed, fourth quarter FFO per unit increased 36% to $0.37. This compares to $0.28 per unit in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Collectively FCRs other gains, losses and expenses or OGLE for short often drive variability in the reported FFO and the Q4 results were no exception.
As shown in the bottom of slide six, Q4 FFO included other aggregate gains of $12.7 million versus other losses and expenses of $3.6 million in the prior period. This roughly $16 million swing year-over-year in OGLE equated to almost $0.08 per unit.
The large gain recognized in the fourth quarter of 2022 relates to our sale of the 50% non-managing interest in the residential component of King High Line. When we placed long-term fixed rate financing on the property, we had an in the money interest rate hedge. This was solely to the benefit of FCR.
Once FCR no longer owned the property, the accounting rules are such that we were required to take all of this benefit into net income, and by extension FFO. So prior to OGLE, Q4 FFO totaled $67.8 million, representing an increase of 5% from the prior year.
On a per unit basis, this measure of FFO equated to $ 0.32 in the fourth quarter of this year, an increase of 8% over a similarly derived $0.29 per unit in the fourth quarter of 2021. In providing some additional context with respect to the Q4 results, let’s walk from top to bottom through the FFO statements.
So returning to the top of slide six. Q4 net operating income of $112.1 million increased by 5% from $106.6 million in the prior year. Here too there are several points of notes. Firstly, Q4 results included $3.6 million of termination receipts, versus essentially nil in the prior year. These settlements related to several tenants that closed their doors during the depths of the COVID lock downs back in 2020.
Moreover, Q4 2022 bad debt expense was actually a recovery of $2.1 million. This reflects strong collections in 2022. And progress with and increased confidence in certain tenants that had acute operating challenges through the mandated closures of 2020 and 2021.
On a year-over-year basis, higher base rents from new and renewal leasing, net leases lost contributed $2.2 million to NOI growth. [indiscernible] against these drivers were several adjustments related to current and prior year CAM and tax recoveries that adversely impacted Q4 NOI by $1.4 million.
And finally, lost income related to disposition activity, reduced Q4 net operating income by $2 million relative to the fourth quarter of 2021. So reflecting on some of the elements of fourth quarter NOI, specifically, the lease termination receipts, the bad debt recovery, the CAM and tax adjustments, it certainly feels like a force theme inherent in the results as we’ve now authored the final and closing chapter on the COVID pandemic story.
Q4 same property NOI increased by $8.1 million, equating to a strong 8.3% year-over-year growth rate. This growth was primarily driven by higher lease termination receipts, lower bad debt and higher base rents. Excluding the bad debt expense at lease termination fees, Q4 same property NOI growth was 0.8%.
Now adjusting for the change in some of the CAM and tax amounts that I mentioned a moment ago, we estimate that a normalized Q4 same property NOI growth rate ex-bad debt at lease termination fees was about 2.5% to the positive.
On a sequential basis, Q4 NOI was $2.6 million, or 2% higher than that earned in Q3. There were a number of factors behind the improvement. First, we’d have the higher lease termination receipts and lower bad debt expense contributing $5.9 million to growth. Higher base rental income contributed $1.1 million. Adjustments related to current and prior year cam and tax recoveries adversely impacted Q4 NOI by $2.3 million, reflecting seasonality and variable revenue contributions were $1.4 million lower in the fourth quarter relative to Q3. And finally, the impact of loss NOI related to net disposition activity was $700,000.
Turning to interest and other income of $5.8 million, this was an increase of 39% year-over-year, an increase of 19% from Q3 of 2022. In each case, the increase was primarily due to higher average interest rates on mortgages and loans receivable. At December 31, FCR’s, mortgages and loans receivables totaled $174 million. And these investments carried a weighted average interest rate of 6.9%.
Comparatively, the mortgages and loans receivable book was $240 million at September 30 and $237 million at December 31 last year. We expect Q1 2023 interest income to decline to approximately $2.7 million from $3.8 million in the fourth quarter. This is due to loan repayments. For added color, our partners in our 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West development project repaid a $50 million loan in December. The loan receivable and the timing of the repayment were all in accordance with the terms of their initial investment in the project, which occurred in September 2021.
Also repaid during the fourth quarter were approximately $25 million of other loans, in mid January of this year, our 2150 Lake Shore partners provided the early repayment of their remaining $50 million loan. This was ahead of the September 2026 maturity date.
While the early repayment will cause a small earnings drag, perhaps an FFO impact of close to $0.01 per unit annualized. The very clear and significant benefits to FCR are a further bolstering of the reach liquidity position and further advancements on debt reduction in the New Year.
Turning to G&A and corporate expenses here too, there are several items of notes in the fourth quarter results. Corporate expenses charged to FFO were $10 million in Q4 of 2022. This was an increase of $900,000 or 8% from the third quarter, and an increase of $2.7 million or 38% from the expenses in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Expenses of note incurred in the fourth quarter of last year, included $1.4 million of legal and advisory costs related to addressing activist activities. We also incurred an additional $500,000 of legal expenses related to a property sale or property transaction that occurred all the way back in 2014.
Unexpectedly this situation went to trial. Now notably, in January of this year, the judge fully awarded in FCRs favor. Unfortunately, being under Quebec jurisdiction, there was no provision for recoveries of costs available to FCR. Hopefully, our transparency on these matters aid in your understanding of the underlying corporate expense trends.
Moving to slide 7, you can see FCRs full year 2022 and comparative 2021 results. Now with today’s call and prior calls, we’ve essentially covered the detail behind all four quarters. Well, there’s a few puts and takes within each of the annual results, the big picture is clear.
Firstly, leasing velocity and rent growth had been strong and occupancy steady. Secondly, through last year in particular, we continue to actively manage FCRs capital through a variety of initiatives, including asset monetizations that prices have exceeded IFRS values on average. We allocate a portion of these funds towards debt repayments, a portion towards value accretive units repurchases, will also continuing to invest in growing the business through development and selective acquisitions.
So as a result of these activities and accomplishments, total FFO increased by 5% in 2022 to $263 million, on a per unit basis growth was 6%. Excluding OGLE items, 2022 FFO was $261 million, an increase of 10% year-over-year. FFO per unit, also excluding OGLE reached $1.20 per units in 2022, up 11% year-over-year. And so FCRs is full year 2022 results were strong on many accounts.
Moving to our fourth quarter operating performance metrics on slide 9. The portfolio rounded out the fourth quarter was an occupancy of 95.8%. This was consistent with the 95.7% reported in Q3 and a modest 30 basis point decline year-over-year. During the fourth quarter, we had 157,000 square feet of tenant possessions set against 122,000 square feet of tenants closures.
Moving to slide 10, we turn to the subject of leasing velocity. On this front, Q4 volume and spreads were strong. Renewal leasing volumes were 711,000 square feet in the fourth quarter, 28% higher than the renewals in Q3, and 57% above the 452,000 square feet of renewal leasing in Q4 of 2021.
Fourth quarter renewal leases were affected an average rent increase of 9.9%, when measuring the first year renewal rent of $25.45 per square foot, relative to a rent of $23.16 per square foot in the final year of the expiring lease.
On the platform basis, Q4 new and renewal leasing was 1 million square feet in the fourth quarter, and for the year as a whole it was 3.6 million square feet. Over the past five years, this volume was only out done back in 2018 when FCR leased 4 million square feet across the platform.
Also, as referenced on slide 10 are average in place, net rental rate per square foot reached $22.95 at December 31st. FCRs in-place rent continues to make new highs. Net rent growth during the fourth quarter was $0.15 per square foot. And on the year-over-year basis growth was $0.53 per square foot or 2.4%. Rent escalations and renewal lifts provided more than 85% of the growth in 2022 net rent per square foot with the impact of new tenant openings, net of closures accounting for the balance.
Slides 11 and 12 provide distribution payout ratio metrics on an FFO, AFFO and ACFO basis. These are largely for informational purposes to provide indications as to how we view and measure the cash generation and sustaining capital expenditure requirements of the business.
For calendar 2022, FCR’s total sustaining capital expenditures, including leasing costs totaled approximately $38 million. Over time, we generally expect to incur $30 million to $40 million annually for sustaining CapEx. And similar to last year, we currently have a plan for 2023 to be at the upper end of that range.
Advancing to Slide 13, the REIT net asset value per unit at December 31, was $23.48. This is virtually unchanged through the fourth quarter, and it was $0.78 per unit, or 3%. lower relative to December of 2021. During the fourth quarter retained FFO was roughly equivalent to the very small net fair value loss on investment properties. On the subject of property valuations, during the fourth quarter more than 100 individual properties were subject to cash flow updates, yield changes, or a combination of both.
And to give a bit of color, assets with more than $3 billion of total fair value were subjected to upward valuations aggregating $55 million. Assets with more than $5 billion of total fair value were subjected to aggregate downward revisions, totaling $80 million. Substantially all of the net fair value adjustments related to income properties, while the very modest $7 million fair value loss related to density and development sites. On the portfolio basis FCR’s stabilized cap rates increased to 5.2% at December 31 from 5.1% to September 30.
Providing an update on capital deployment, as summarized on Slide 14, we invested $43 million into development, leasing and residential development and other CapEx during the fourth quarter. Most of this capital was invested into assets located in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.
For 2022 in its entirety, we invested $162 million into the property portfolio, including $103 million into development expenditures, and residential development. Over the course of the year, FCR also invested $62 million into complementary and strategic property acquisitions, while roughly $95 million was allocated to repurchase 6.2 million trust units at a weighted average price that was 36% below the year end net asset value per units.
Anticipating that the question might otherwise be asked, as we look forward this year, we currently anticipate development related capital expenditures to increase to a range of $200 million to $225 million. All other capital expenditures, including sustaining, revenue enhancing and recoverable CapEx are at currently anticipated to be in the range of $70 million to $80 million for 2023.
Turning to slide 15, we’ve summarized key financing activities. During the fourth quarter alone, we reduced total net debt by $252 million. This includes the repayment of our $250 million Series P unsecured debentures in early December, as well as the purchasers assumption of the $80 million share of the mortgage on the residential component of King High Line. We also secured a new $100 million term loan that we’ve swapped it to a fixed interest rate of 5.0% for a four year term.
On slide 16 of the presentation, you’ll see a summary of some of FCRs debt metrics. These metrics are strong, and on several key fronts, they posted significant improvements. As at December 31, the REITs net debt to total assets ratio was 44.0%. This is consistent with the Q4 2021 metric and 140 basis points lower than the 45.4% at the end of the third quarter. Notably FCRs net debt to EBITDA ratio declined to 10.2 times, a marked improvement from 11.2 times one year ago, and 10.9 times at September 30.
At December 31, General corporate liquidity was 654 million. In addition, several of the REITs development projects are funded by dedicated construction facilities. Since year end, we funded a $234 million of 10 year mortgages carrying a weighted average interest rate of 5.35%. These mortgages are secured against the portfolio of six shopping centres located in Alberta.
The net proceeds have allowed for the full repayment of amounts outstanding other under FCRA $800 million of revolving credit facilities. And they’ve reduced floating rate debt exposure to approximately 5% from 10% formerly, and of course, they’ve also both bolstered pro forma liquidity to approximately $900 million, again, excluding amounts that are available on our construction facilities. We believe these are all very strong financial metrics.
This concludes my prepared remarks for the afternoon. And I’ll now turn the call to Jordan Robins, FCR’s Chief Operating Officer provide some commentary on property investments, operations and development.
Jordan Robins
Thanks, Neil, and good afternoon. Our high quality grocery anchored portfolio continues to perform. As you’ve heard, we finished 2022 strong the very positive fourth quarter. As we reflect both on the quarter and the year, we’re pleased with the advancements we made with our entitlement ladder, our active development program, our enhanced capital allocation plan, and of course, our active leasing program.
Our annual leasing volume and the associated growth in renewal rates is a gauge of how our business is tracking. Based on our performance in 2022, we have good reason for optimism. This past year we leased 3.6 million square feet on a platform wide basis. For context. This annual total is greater than our 2017 through 2019 three year pre-pandemic average. Over 1 million square feet of this leasing volume was completed in Q4 that 3.6 million square feet is made up of over 600,000 square feet of new deals, and 3 million square feet of renewals the most we’ve completed since 2018.
Lift on these renewals in the quarter at our share was 9.9%. 3.6 million square feet of leasing volume does not include our 1.4 million square foot leasing pipeline, representing new and renewal lease agreements committed or under negotiation where the tenant is not yet in possession. This pipeline is a window into the future and as it converts we expect it will have a positive impact on occupancy and FFO.
We’re seeing strong tenant demand primarily from grocery stores, dollar stores, full service, sit down restaurants, discount food stores like Bulk Barn, off-price retailers like TJX, health & wellness QSR, and pet retailers. In 2022, we finalized leases and successfully delivered possession to a number of new and notable tenants that we are confident will have a meaningful impact upon the FCR Neighbourhoods in which they operate.
To name a few, these tenants include a 30,000 square foot are cellos urban market grocery store at our Aquavista, Bayside property in Toronto, and a 20,000 square foot Petsmart at Clairfield Commons in Guelph. We also delivered to Dollarama 32,000 square feet of space located at Mount Royal Village in Calgary, 3080 Yonge in Toronto, and at Maple Grove Center in Oakville. We made great progress in Oakville with respect to luxury brands as well. This past quarter we gave possession of a 14,000 square foot space to a renowned soon to be announced retailer who chose Oakville as their first location in the country. Their possession follows on the heels of our recently opened 7,000 square foot Balenciaga deal, who we had also brought to the market in 2021. Balenciaga first took their space as a pop up and shortly thereafter agreed to execute a long-term lease based on their initial success and the long-term commitments we had secured with the other luxury brand co-tenants in the neighborhood.
Recognizing the constraint on supply for new space in light of rising construction costs, national tenants have become quite active driving demand for larger space in particular. For example, in 2022, we made significant progress releasing the former Walmart stores at Fairview in St. Catharines, Cedarbrae in Toronto, and Stanley Park in Kitchener. In all three locations, Walmart was paying single-digit gross rents. We are in the process of replacing these low gross rent deals with leases with new tenants, all of whom will pay double-digit net rent.
The releasing we’ve done will not only reposition these centers, improve the tenant mix and the associated consumer draw. It will also serve to reduce the common area costs for the balance of the tenants, increase the NOI and the value of each of these assets. Our investment team had a very busy quarter capping off what was a very solid year with gross disposition proceeds of $277 million. The total proceeds represented a 15% premium to our IFRS NAV. In Q4, as part of our $1 billion enhanced capital allocation and portfolio optimization plan, we realized $179 million in gross proceeds from sales. This includes $149 million from the sale of our remaining 50% interest in our King High Line residential property.
During the quarter, we also closed on the sale of a 25% interest in our Yonge and Roselawn development site in Toronto. The project is approved as a mixed use retail and multi-family property with a total of 548 residential rental units and approximately 65,000 square feet of retail space. We sold this interest to Woodward, a highly regarded institutional investor for approximately $30 million, plus the assumption of their pro rata share of the development costs. We retain the role of co-development manager. While we did have offers to buy 100% interest in this property from condominium developers for a significantly higher price, we will realize more value developing and owning this zone, shovel ready mixed use project with 65,000 square feet of retail space as purpose built rental.
We do this as an extraordinary development an extraordinary neighborhood, which has been designated as an urban centre in Toronto. Our partner Woodbourne is like minded and collectively we are driven to build one of the best, most energy and carbon efficient purpose built rental properties in Toronto. It was a quieter quarter and year for acquisitions. Notwithstanding, in 2022, we did still manage to close an approximately $60 million are principally tuck-in assets that form part of a larger assemblies that Avenue Lawrence in Toronto, at Blue Room Spadina in Toronto, and on Montgomery at Yonge and Eglinton in Toronto.
As at December 31, 2022, we’ve submitted for entitlements on over 16.7 million square feet of incremental density, representing 69% of our 24.1 million square foot pipeline. Today, over 8.6 million square feet of this pipeline is now entitled. We expected another 3 million square feet of this pipeline should be entitled by year end. For context, this to be approved density includes amongst other assets, 385,000 square feet of incremental density at York Mills and Leslie in Toronto, and 540,000 square feet of incremental density at Staples Lougheed and Burnaby BC.
The remaining 6 million square feet of these entitlement submissions that we’ve made are currently with staff at various municipalities and will be approved in 2024 and 2025. As set out under disclosures, only 7 million square feet of our 24.1 million square foot pipeline is carried on our balance sheet at approximately $72 per square foot. With this in mind, there will no doubt be meaningful NAB road as properties like those which I’ve referenced. And those other properties in the queue including for example, Avenue and Lawrence, 221 Sterling, 332 Bloor and Yonge and Montgomery, all located in Toronto are approved.
As I mentioned our last call, even after the sale of the density contemplated in our enhanced capital allocation and portfolio optimization plan, we still expect to possess over 17 million square feet of incremental density in our residual pipeline, resulting in a very substantial long term growth profile. This past quarter, we continue to advance our active developments as well.
Starting first with our high rise program. The structure of 200 Esplanade in North Vancouver is now complete. With 97% of the costs awarded, we are on budget and on schedule for late 2023 delivery. Here in Toronto, the P1 level is being completed at Edenbridge, our 209 unit condominium development located on our Humber Town shopping centre lands. 95% of the costs have been awarded and 88% of the units at Edenbridge are now sold.
Shoring and excavation at 400 King Street West, our 460,000 square foot retail and residential condominium development in Toronto is now well underway. 97% of the units there have been sold and we are holding back the sale of the final units until the project is closer to completion.
Next week shoring and excavation will commence at our 138 Yorkville development site. Sales for this exclusive project will commence in the second half of 2023. In 2022, we also made tremendous progress with our remerchandising program at Cedarbrae in Toronto, the extensive renovation to the former Walmart store is well underway and on schedule for delivery in the second half of 2023. Their departure had presented us with the opportunity to both renovate and retenant their former premises and create a comprehensive plan for the centre.
The former Walmart space is being redemised into a variety of larger format, exterior facing and interior units. As part of this merchandising plan, we’re constructing a new facade and a new point of access to and from the renovated centre. We will also relocate several tenants from 3434 Laurens, our property located across the road into the former Walmart premises.
In addition to increasing traffic to the centre, relocating these tenants from across the street, will serve to remove the related lease encumbrances at 3434 Laurens, and provide us with the ability to initiate its redevelopment upon receipt of the related entitlements. At Stanley Park in Kitchener, Ontario demolition of the former Walmart is now complete. And we have just commenced our pad preparation. We expect to give Canadian Tire possession of their path in the spring of 2023. So they can begin the construction of their new store with a planned opening in the first half of 2024, where the pace of inflation for material and labor has slowed, we’ve remained fixated on protecting our projects from cost escalations.
With this in mind, we’ve awarded 100% of the trade contracts at both Stanley Park and Cedarbrae. As I mentioned, we’ve also awarded between 80% to 90% of the associated contracts and fixed a large portion of our costs for our high rise program.
In summary, 2022 was a solid year, capped off by a very solid quarter in Q4. It was highlighted by strong quarter-over-quarter metrics, including same property NOI growth, leasing volume and leasing spreads. In Q4, we also continued to advance our entitlement program, our active development program and our enhanced capital allocation plan.
And with that, operator, we can now open it up for questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
Certainly, thank you. We will not take questions from the telephone lines. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from Sam Damiani with TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Sam Damiani
Thanks. Good afternoon. First question just on occupancy. You’ve talked a lot about the leasing, robust environment that we’re in. Yet the – the face occupancy rate of the portfolio still about 100 basis points below pre-pandemic averages. I guess we got some Walmart’s are still underway. But what would be other key reasons why are holding back that occupancy rate from ratcheting back up closer to 97%?
Neil Downey
Hey, Sam, it’s Neil. It principally relates to large format, retailers that we’ve talked about in the past, i.e. Walmart. And in fact, we anticipate that that will largely be the case again, for 2023. We do have a 40 to 50 basis point occupancy headwind but as you’ve alluded to, I think in one of your reports, a Walmart that’s departing mid year this year. And so you know, I would say that is in a nutshell, the principal reason for the stability and the occupancy. And without providing specific guidance, we have a general expectation of a similar occupancy rate as we progress through this year.
Sam Damiani
Okay. That’s helpful. Second quick question for me. Just on King High Line, this hopefully the last time we talked about it, but just on the on the sale. How do you think about that property’s NOI growth prospects over the medium and longer term? Particularly in relation to the remaining portfolio that FCR has? And how do you think about the sale pricing at $925 a foot compared to replacement cost or other recent market transactions? Just wondering, how that sale might compare to other assets? You’re thinking about selling over the next couple of years? Thank you.
Adam Paul
Yeah. So as you know, Sam, when we press released the transaction, it was $149 million sale. And at the time, we indicated that was a yield equal to 2.9% on income in place, or run rate income. And I guess, maybe to flush that out a little bit for you. The actual NOI on our share of that asset was $4 million last year. So that’s about a, probably a 2.6% yield, if you take 2022, actual NOI relative to the sale price. We concur with you that, it’s a very high quality asset. And, I think in terms of you leading me here in the questioning, we concur that we’ll have a good growth profile.
Our internal budgets would have that asset at our share, and NOI number that would be approaching $5 million. If we look, say three years out, so a million dollars of growth. But that’s from a 2.6% starting yield. So yes, the growth in the asset looks good, but it was a very low yielding asset. We achieved what we view as being a premium pricing, we did indicate the sale price was a premium to our IFRS net asset value. And importantly, we were able to redeploy that capital immediately and creatively in a way that also in the eyes of, I believe many of our equity investors reduces the leverage by a significant degree in our business. So we think we achieved a lot with the transaction.
Sam Damiani
Thanks. And I’ll turn it back.
Adam Paul
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from Mario Saric with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.
Mario Saric
Hi, good afternoon, and thanks for taking the question. I just want to focus on the optimization plan, and specifically the targeted 1 billion of dispositions for the next couple of years of which almost 200 has been completed. Another 200 is presumably held for sale, can you just kind of walk through what the key factors are, that will dictate kind of the pace of that disposition activity?
Adam Paul
Yeah. Thank you very much Mario. So there’s a few factors that are going to determine the pace and it will be spread out over the two year timeframe that we laid out. Some of the factors are how prime the asset is for sale. So we’re on the cusp of, achieving zoning on some of them. And so we don’t want to prematurely sell those and have zoning risk priced into the – into the sale price. Another factor that will dictate the pace of the sales is our tax profile. So, we — something that’s important for us to manage as well. And so those are some of the key factors.
Mario Saric
Okay. And then just maybe a clarification point, Adam, from your prepared remarks earlier about expecting previous, stronger premium pricing in relation to the dispositions, is that expectation relative to the bids that you received to date, relative to IFRS values, just wanted to maybe get a bit more color in terms of what you meant by expecting stronger, premium pricing?
Adam Paul
Yeah, well, what I mean is, when you have an active sales program, how you approach it, and how you’re thinking about it, I think is quite important. And so while we’re motivated to achieve the objectives we’ve laid out, by no means does that result in our views of being flexible on price, or fire selling the assets.
And I touched on where the pockets of strength are today in the market. And it’s not a perfect market, it really is. But we’ve said before, it’s constructive enough to achieve what we’re going to achieve. But the assets we sold from 2019 and the two or three years following that were geared to a very different objective, which is enhancing the quality of the portfolio and where we sit today, this is an exceptional portfolio. And, and so the assets we’re selling are great, and great assets in this country should command very strong pricing. And so that’s our mentality and our expectation as we pursue sales. So hopefully, that’s enough color to give you what you’re looking for.
Mario Saric
Yeah, of course, thanks Adam. I’ll hold over my cue and get back at the queue.
Adam Paul
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from at Pammi Bir with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Pammi Bir
Thanks. Hi, everyone. Just maybe coming back to the disposition program. What are you seeing in terms of the types of buyers for both? Whether it’s income producing or land or densely occurring environment? Just curious if you’re seeing any perhaps changes relative to perhaps the second half of last year?
Adam Paul
Well, the one common theme that we’re seeing across virtually every buyer that we’re dealing with, which has been the case for quite some time now, so I wouldn’t call it a change. But the common theme is we’re dealing almost exclusively with private capital. And it ranges from very high net worth, family businesses and portfolios to private equity. But the common thread is its private capital versus are some of the other forms.
Pammi Bir
Okay. And then just thinking about, I guess, the overall strategic plan, and I think you highlighted if I recall, 4%, FFO CAGR from — on a three year basis 2021 to 2024. And I think you’ve also excluded the other gains and losses. There’s obviously some additional factors this year, but is that within the range of the growth that you see perhaps for this year, or can you share just in terms of your thinking for 2023?
Neil Downey
Hi, Pammi, it’s as Neil, as you know, we gave an objective of greater than the $20 of FFO per unit, not by this year, but rather by next. We do not give specific guidance in terms of what our annual FFO objectives are. I think, as you can appreciate some of the challenges to earnings growth in the current environment do relate to interest rates and the fact that we and I go out went on a limb here, probably every other REIT Canada face refinancing costs that are higher, not lower. And there is some general G&A pressure as it relates to salary and wages growth.
So, we’ve given you an indication as to how we see our operating FFO at about $1.20 for last year. And we think you can work down to a Q4 sort of run rate. So, from that, I would say that there are definitely some challenges, but we still expect our FFO per unit off of those numbers to be better in 2023 versus 2022.
Pammi Bir
Thanks very much. I will turn it back.
Adam Paul
Thank you, Pammi.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from Gaurav Mathur with iA Capital Markets. Please, go ahead.
Gaurav Mathur
Thank you and good afternoon, everyone. Just Firstly, when we were looking at leasing activity through the lens of an upcoming recession, is there any segment of the tenant mix where you’re witnessing a change in sentiment that may cause any concern?
Adam Paul
Hi. Thank you very much for the question. And just getting right to the point, no, we’re absolutely not seeing that. And if you look historically, through previous recessions, and you look at first capitals, key operating metrics, whether it be same property NOI growth, lease renewal list, occupancy, you simply cannot see the recession or correlate to the recession.
And, we’ve said this many times before. We’re not a barometer for all things, retail. We operate in a very specific sub sector of retail, both in location, and, very importantly, to the nature of your question, the way we merchandise, our assets. And so, grocery stores, medical facilities, coffee shops, restaurants, discount retailers, through the likes of winners, etcetera, daycare facilities, pharmacies and through recessions, we see consumer habits changing, but they just simply don’t flow through to FCR and the business that we do with our tenants.
Gaurav Mathur
Okay, great. And, lastly, just focusing on the disposition pipeline again; and thank you for sharing your thoughts on the buyer pool. But I’m just wondering, as you go through the process of dispositions, how much of that activity is being determined by, say, the bid-ask spread, versus, where financing rates tend to stabilize at the end of it? Is that something that’s been discussed a lot as you undergo through the process?
Adam Paul
Yes, look, there’s — the reality is, there’s a lot of factors at play that are impacting the market dynamics. But, I think, what underpins the program and the success we’ve had thus far and all the signals that we’re seeing on the ground that indicate we will continue to have success is that, a lot of what we’re selling is residential density.
We’re all very familiar with the shortage of housing in literally every major Canadian city, that’s where we’re located. Our sites are typically within the best locations, when you look at amenities, population density, access to transit, and all the other things that make neighborhoods great neighborhoods.
And so, there are a lot of businesses out there and investors out there that are positioning their capital to continue building the housing that we clearly need across the board. So the government’s very focused on it. And I think that’s the fundamental element that’s underpinning the success that we’ve had so far.
Gaurav Mathur
Great. Thank you for the color. I’ll turn it back to the operator.
Adam Paul
Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from Kyle Willie [ph] with National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.
Unidentified Analyst
Hi, good afternoon.
Adam Paul
Hi Kyle.
Unidentified Analyst
Just over the last couple years, you’ve highlighted a couple of Walmart exits. I just wondering is that something strategic on your end that you want to merchandise away from discount or something in the relationship or just that — they’re opening a new box across the street. I have no idea; can you give a little color there?
Adam Paul
Well, yes, absolutely, we can give you the color. We don’t have many left. The decisions on the Walmarts that have vacated have been Walmart’s decisions. In some cases, we’ve played a role where they need a food restriction and we can potentially facilitate that. We’ve declined to facilitate that.
The issue for us with Walmart is it’s a very tough tenant to earn a return on, because the nature of their leases are very in their favor with respect to qualitative elements like what you can do with the balance of your Senator, whether it be no bills, or use exclusivities.
And financially, the leases are real tough, right? They’re typically very long-term leases, often 99 year leases when you include their options. And the toughest part about them is most typically, their net rent is flat throughout that entire time period. So, their real effect of rent declines every year. And they don’t pay the same level of operating costs that typical tenants do.
And so that burden either gets borne on the landlord or inflated in terms of what the rest of the tenants pay to bridge that. So, it’s a very tough tenant for us to make money on.
Now, we wouldn’t want them all back at one time, because as you’ve seen, the repurposing exercise has been fruitful and profitable and increased value. But it does result in a fairly lengthy period of cash flow interruption.
And so getting them back on a staggered basis works, but our issue, like wonderful retailer, but very tough to make money on from our perspective, given our model.
Unidentified Analyst
Okay. And then with 200 Esplanade coming close to fruition here, just wondering what kind of development yield you expect to have on that project and where you’re thinking about apartment rents that you’re going to be going out at, when you start to market the building?
Adam Paul
Yes, I’ll touch on the first part, and then Jordi can touch on the rental REIT part. So, — and this is inherently the challenge for us with residential development, particularly in Vancouver, because the development yield on an unlevered basis starts with a four, which is less attractive to us. Our partner, who’s a private developer, is a lot more excited about the development metrics on the day that the project is completed, because — and we’re cognizant of this too and obviously, this is the main reason why we went forward on the development. But the market tap rate forward is lower — notably lower. And — so the development profits, certainly the way the current pro forma continues to indicate is quite attractive. But the going in yields are — it starts with a four.
Unidentified Analyst
Okay. And then sorry, just what sort of rents do you think that translates into? Like when you like…
Adam Paul
Yes, I thought its Jordi, sorry about that. Yes, I would suggest you we expect to get in the high floors. You know, the units are relatively, I’ll say small. And the expectation is that they will lease up relatively quickly. It’s a small — a relatively small building and in an area that remains strategic for us. We have the centre adjacent to it and then there’s some additional overflow retail at the base as well.
Unidentified Analyst
Okay. And then just lastly, on the Young and Roselawn transaction, and just — like, you decided to do a partial stake here, which is great to raise a little cash for you, and you keep your interest in the project, which means, you’ll be funding its development over time. I’m just wondering, like, when you look at like the disposition program ahead, how you’re sort of thinking about, yes, that’s one we want to stay in on and that’s one we might exit entirely?
Adam Paul
Yes. That’s a great question, Tal. And so the first thing we do is, we step back and we say, is this an impactful development that fits what we’re trying to do and, and what are the returns look like on it? And then from there, like we’ve done in other larger projects that we’ve developed, we’ve said, is there a potential partner that not only brings capital, but brings in an expertise that improves the development capability of the team, reduces risk and increases the probability of success.
And so when we look at the Young and Roselawn property, and Jordi touched on it in his prepared remarks that, we could have sold the land for more and exited the project. But, we do believe there’s a lot of development profit that can be realized through the development, and we believe that Woodbourne brings an expertise and this is not our first partnership with Woodbourne. So we’ve got a good handle on their platform. But we do think they bring value to the table, while we’re still the development manager working with them, and they also brought an institution from overseas that will disclose at a later date of their request that we also think can grow into a larger strategic partnership. That’s certainly our desire. And that is also that institution’s desire. So, that’s how we look at it. And then, you know, obviously, for ones that are less compelling for us, and what we’re trying to do, those are the ones will exit entirely.
Unidentified Analyst
So we should expect to see some, like 100% exits of development — more development sites going forward.
Adam Paul
Absolutely.
Unidentified Analyst
Okay. Thanks, Adam. Appreciate it.
Adam Paul
Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from Dean Wilkinson with CIBC. Please go ahead.
Dean Wilkinson
Thank you, and good afternoon. Questions for Neil. You didn’t go out on a limb with a debt refinancing. That’s an absolute fact. What was the thought process when you looked at that stuff you did in Calgary to take 10 year term sort of the 535?
Neil Downey
Yes. Hi, Dean. A number of considerations. One, for sure is the fact and this has been pointed out by probably you and a few of your peers, the fact that our debt ladder has been shortening, and that’s really been the natural process of us repaying debt as it comes due. And not being in the market originating new long-term debt, so that was certainly a factor.
Secondly, these are great qualities, very stable, very solid cash flowing assets. So, given the cash flow that these assets threw off, they were capable of supporting a fairly high LTV by our financing standards anyways. So, the assets were financed at a mid-60% LTV. And so we got a nice loan amount, we got lots of term. And the overall blended rate in the low-fives worked very well for us.
Dean Wilkinson
All right. And then, the sort of corollary to that is when you look at those debt financing costs, and they’ve increased some 100, whatever basis points year-over-year, how do you square that against cap rates that are flat or up 20 basis points, depending on who you would talk to? And you’ve been doing this for a while? What’s your thought on that, sort of negative differential there? And how that could play out?
Neil Downey
Yeah. Well, look, we’ve seen this for quite some time now that cap rates and interest rates are far from perfectly correlated. And so certainly, the movement in rates relative to cap rate is one element. And, we’ve been, so far at least we’ve been at the forefront on property write-downs. 20 basis points may sound small, but it’s over 4% of our asset value that we’ve written down.
But what’s countering that is, is where our rental rates, how is cash flow growing, the whole dynamic around increased replacement costs and what that should mean to rents over the next number of years? That’s all — that’s a counter balanced that.
And then, the reality is we’re in neighborhoods, including in Calgary, where the population continues to grow at a very attractive rate with healthy household income, and very, very little new retail supply.
So the retail square footage per capita in these neighborhoods continues to go in the right direction. And, we think that’s part of the counterbalance, why cap rates have held in so well, and, but grocery anchored retail has proved its resiliency through the pandemic.
And I think performed significantly better than most people would have expected in the early and mid part of 2020. So I think that those are probably some of the reasons but clearly we’ve seen for quite some time now that there is not a perfect correlation between interest rates and cap rates.
Dean Wilkinson
Sounds good. Thanks, guys.
Neil Downey
Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. There are no further analyst questions at this time. This will conclude the question-and-answer session. So I will turn the call over to Adam.
Adam Paul
Okay. Thank you very much. Look, we apologize for running over in time, but clearly, we’ve got a lot going on. We wanted to make sure. We also got through all of the questions from analysts that cover. So Thank you very much, everyone for your participation and interest in First Capital. Have a wonderful afternoon.
Operator
Thank you. The conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time. And we thank you for your participation.
Be the first to comment