Brookfield Business Partners L.P. (NYSE:BBU) Q3 2022 Results Conference Call November 4, 2022 9:30 AM ET
Company Participants
Alan Fleming – Senior Vice President of Investor Relations
Cyrus Madon – Chief Executive Officer
Denis Turcotte – Chief Operating Officer
Jaspreet Dehl – Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Gary Ho – Desjardins
Jaeme Gloyn – National Bank
Operator
Welcome to the Brookfield Business Partners Third Quarter 2022 Results Conference Call and Webcast [Operator Instructions].
Now I’d like to turn the conference over to Alan Fleming, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Mr. Fleming.
Alan Fleming
Thank you, operator, and good morning. Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that in responding to questions and talking about our growth initiatives and our financial and operating performance, we may make forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and future results may differ materially. For further information on known risk factors, I encourage you to review our filings with the securities regulators in Canada and the US, which are available on our Web site. Joining me on the call with me today is Cyrus Madon, Chief Executive Officer; Denis Turcotte, Chief Operating Officer; and Jaspreet Dehl, Chief Financial Officer. Cyrus will start with an update on our strategic initiatives and Denis will then provide some perspective on what we’re seeing in the current environment. Jaspreet will finish with the discussion of our financial results, and we’ll then be available to take your questions.
And with that, I’ll pass the call over to Cyrus.
Cyrus Madon
Thanks, Alan and good morning, everyone. Thank you very much for joining us today. While we’re operating in a challenging environment, we had a strong third quarter. We generated record adjusted EBITDA of about $630 million, up more than 40% over the prior year. We’re really pleased with our results. As many of you know, in October, we reached an agreement to sell Westinghouse to a strategic consortium led by Chemical Corporation and Brookfield Renewable Partners for $8 billion. This is a major milestone for our business that meaningfully advances our capital recycling and supports our growth. We expect to generate about $1.8 billion of net proceeds to BBU and crystallize a 6 times multiple on our investments when combined with all the distributions that we’ve received to date. We’re very pleased with this outcome. And over the last few weeks, unitholders who hold more than half of the votes eligible to be cast, have provided us their support in favor of the transaction. We hope to close the sale in the second half of next year.
Looking forward, we have other large scale businesses that will reach a mature state and eventually be sold. The timing will of course depend on how far along we are in our business plans and broader market conditions. We’ve invested a lot of capital, significant amount of capital over the last two years to acquire super high quality large scale businesses, which should generate very substantial proceeds for BBU when it comes to monetize them several years from now. I want to turn to our growth initiatives. In October, alongside our partner, we completed the privatization of Nielsen. As many of you know, Nielsen is the market leader in third party audience measurement. As the media landscape continues to evolve, the businesses scale and customer relationships position it really well to provide a unified measure of audience viewership. We’re excited about making this investment and look forward to supporting the business’ growth strategy. We’ve also continued to focus on opportunities to grow our existing business. Last month, our engineered components manufacturer completed the acquisition of a leading distributor of axles and other trailer components, which provides us opportunities to continue growing and scaling our distribution operations. And our Brazilian fleet management operations completed the acquisition of Unidas, a leading full service rent a car platform, which doubles the size of our existing fleet management business and provides meaningful opportunities to reduce costs and increase our scale.
As our business continues to grow, the cash flows our operations generate are also continuing to increase. To put this in context, in the last 12 months, our operations have generated about $800 million of free cash flow. This is after interest, taxes, required maintenance CapEx and depletion, all at our share, which to put into context means our units today are trading at around a 6 times multiple of free cash flow. As we approach the end of the year, our focus is on continuing to build value within our operations. And before wrapping up, I want to thank all of you that were able to join us in September at our Annual Investor Day. For any of you that missed it, the webcast is available on our Web site.
With that, I’m going to turn it over to Denis.
Denis Turcotte
Thanks, Cyrus. Good morning, everyone. As most of you are aware, we’re a global business today with operations that span across North America, Brazil, Europe and Asia Pacific. We own and operate large scale businesses touching nearly every facet of the global economy, which gives us a unique perspective and being able to monitor, anticipate and respond to changes in the global operating environment. With that context, I thought I’d spend a few minutes today to talk about several of the key themes we’re seeing across the global operating environment and how we’re responding to support our businesses. I’ll start first with inflation. Most categories that form our cost of delivery, whether it be raw materials, transportation, logistics, labor, energy, remain elevated and above pre-COVID levels. The good news is we see many of these areas resetting back to trend line over time, some of that has already happened. Steel prices, a common material in a large number of our businesses, as an example, are down 60% from levels this time last year, and likely to drop further. We see this happening with other materials as well. Global container rates have also softened from previous highs, making international shipping options and costs both land and sea more favorable. However, we’re still seeing shortages or constraints in certain supply chains and associated higher costs. We have been focused on diversifying our supplier networks, optimizing our inventory levels and mitigating both direct and indirect costs and risks where we can. More broadly, we think the greater localization and reshoring of key inputs will support continued easing on global supply chains.
Global labor markets continue to be tight and are not yet showing signs of easing, and labor costs may very well be structurally higher for longer across both services and manufacturing sectors. Labor attrition rates in some of our operations have hit up to 30% or more in certain cases, and like most were encountering similar challenges in the professional workforce. To compensate, we’re putting more emphasis on ensuring we have strong management teams in place across all our operations with the right requisite organizational structure and associated compensation arrangements to both attract and retain key talent. Similarly, energy availability and cost, in particular in Europe, have been an increasing focus of ours as the year’s progressed. While the price of oil may present increased margin opportunities at some of our businesses, this is by exception and not sustainable. More broadly, the price and availability of natural gas as a major feedstock for many global production processes have significant implications on both production and cost levels, which may drive decisions to idle or cut back capacity to optimize cost structures in certain regions.
Within this inflationary context, we’re determined to maintain our margin performance. So far, we’ve done a fairly good job of increasing prices, which has been required in this type of environment simply to recover from inflationary cost pressure and to maintain margins. The nature of the larger businesses we own providers of essential products, services and market leading positions, are well positioned to pass through impacts of inflation with minimal impact to demand over time. Though there are situations with timelines given broader macro forces. There have been pockets where this has been an advantage for us, whether it’s at Clarios or at some of our smaller operations like Greenergy, but it has been a continuous effort over the past year, and in some cases, we’re only now starting to see the benefit of pricing actions fully catch up to the pace of cost escalation. We’re also increasingly looking at opportunities that may emerge driven by both higher prices and rising interest rates. In particular, as the replacement costs of our asset intensive businesses increase, we should be in a strong position to participate in a repricing of contractual rates to enhance our cash flows. The buy versus rent equation for customers is also changing as capital becomes scarcer and more expensive. We’re fortunate to have businesses whether it’s our returnable packaging business or our modular building leasing services operation in Europe that are well positioned to align with evolving customer buying behavior that ultimately will strengthen our longer term competitive position. We look forward to taking any of your questions later.
And with that, I’ll hand it over to Jaspreet.
Jaspreet Dehl
Thanks, Denis, and good morning, everyone. We reported strong financial results in the third quarter and continuing to be pleased with the performance of our business. Adjusted EBITDA increased to $627 million from $443 million last year. Adjusted EFO increased to $339 million from $276 million last year. We saw improved contributions from each of our three operating segments. Starting with our business services segment, adjusted EBITDA increased by 40% to $229 million and adjusted EFO improved to $152 million. Our residential mortgage insurer generated $69 million of adjusted EBITDA, primarily driven by higher premiums earned following strong underwriting activity over the last few years. We continue to see low levels of mortgage default rates in the business as well. New underwriting activity is moderating and we expected this, but the business remains very well positioned to manage through a period of normalizing housing activity. In July, we closed the acquisition of our dealer software and technology services operation, which contributed $49 million of adjusted EBITDA during the quarter. The team is pleased with what we’re seeing in the business so far. It’s still early days but we have a high degree of confidence in achieving our value creation plans. Healthcare services contributed $16 million of adjusted EBITDA during the quarter. Results continue to be impacted by higher rates of surgery cancellations and elevated operating costs. The labor environment is slowly improving as absenteeism, sick leave and overtime are all trending towards normal levels. We’re working closely with the management team to support the business and expect performance to improve as the operating environment normalizes.
Moving to our industrial segment. Adjusted EBITDA was $228 million compared to $171 million last year. Adjusted EFO increased to $131 million and included $11 million after tax net gain on the partial sale of our investment in public securities. Advanced energy storage operations during the quarter generated adjusted EBITDA over $122 million, which was in line with last year. Higher selling prices and a favorable mix of higher margin advanced battery sales contributed to results during the quarter. We are seeing impact of higher labor and input costs in this business. Increased overall battery volumes benefited from stronger original equipment manufacturer or OEM demand as auto production challenges are starting to ease during the quarter. Our engineered components manufacturer generated $32 million of adjusted EBITDA. Performance benefited from the contribution of recent add on acquisitions, as well as pricing actions. The business is focused on cost saving opportunities to support margin and offset the impact of reduced volumes in the current environment. And finally, in infrastructure services we generated adjusted EBITDA of $205 million compared to $140 million last year. Adjusted EFO was $102 million. Nuclear technology services performed well in the quarter generating $63 million of adjusted EBITDA. Contributions from the recent BHI Energy acquisition was offset by reduced volume in part due to disruptions caused by the conflict in Ukraine.
The business remains on track to generate strong full year adjusted EBITDA and cash flow. Lottery services generated adjusted EBITDA of $39 million in the third quarter. Demand has remained resilient and we’re helping the business on initiatives to mitigate the impact of higher input costs and supply chain challenges. Modular building leasing services contributed adjusted EBITDA of $37 million, a strong demand in Germany and Asia Pacific is helping support overall utilization level. Performance also benefited from increased penetration of higher margin value add products and services, as well as pricing actions. We’re continuing to assist the business in reviewing potential add on acquisition opportunities to enhance its offering and expand its geographic footprint. We ended the quarter in a strong capital position with $2.8 billion of pro forma corporate liquidity. This takes into account the planned syndication of our recently closed acquisitions, as well as the expected proceeds from the sale of our investment in Westinghouse. This provides us with significant flexibility to manage our balance sheet.
With that, I’d like to close our comments and turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Gary Ho of Desjardins.
Gary Ho
First one maybe for Cyrus, just in your letter to shareholders, you hinted at further monetization. I guess my question, how do you balance between the current choppy environment to monetize? So maybe perhaps lower end of your valuation versus perhaps the kind of investments in your pipeline that you can also buy at attractive valuations?
Cyrus Madon
I think in the letter, what we said is, in the fullness of time, we expect to have large scale monetizations. And we’re really giving some context to the fact that over the last couple of years, we’ve invested a lot of capital, many billions of dollars of capital, and that, in the fullness of time, five, six, seven years from now, those acquisitions will likely generate in the order of $12 billion of proceeds for us. So that’s the context we’re trying to give. As to the environment today, I would just say that strategics, in general, are well capitalized, certainly industries are very well capitalized. And they could be buyers, I’ll just say generally, but we didn’t have anything specific in mind in our letter.
Gary Ho
And then while I have you, I want to go back to Superior Plus investment. You had the press that generates 7.25 cash dividend yield and Brookfield also participate in the equity offering. And those returns are quite a bit off your 15% to 20% that you typically target for investments. So how should we look at this? Are you content with keeping the stake, adding to itself and [Technical Difficulty] on that one?
Cyrus Madon
We’re very happy with our investment. We do get a 7.25% coupon on our preferred share investment. We participate in the upside of the share price. As far as we’re concerned, the company’s performing well. We’re very pleased with it and we’re happy with the position we have.
Gary Ho
And then just last one, maybe for Jaspreet, your US dollar reporting with global businesses. How does the stronger US dollar impact your results, was that a negative this quarter? And how should we model that out?
Jaspreet Dehl
So I think when you think about foreign currency exposure for the business, there’s really kind of two levels of exposure to think about. The first just in terms of our invested capital and the equity that we have in the businesses, and it just kind of stepping back there. In all of the acquisitions that we’ve made over the last three to five years, the majority of them, I’d say about 65% of the capital we’ve deployed has been in US dollars. And the balance has been either in developing countries, India, Brazil, which is a small piece of the book, which we always hedge and then in other developed countries, the exposures really Canadian, Aussie dollars or euro. And on our invested capital, we have a hedging policy and we typically hedge our capital going in. And it’s an active program where we’re constantly monitoring the hedges and rolling things or crystallizing where it makes sense. So that’s kind of how we think about the equity that we put into the businesses. The second piece is around the underlying operations. And we’ve got operations in countries outside of the US, either where we’ve made investments like Modulaire, or large global businesses like Clarios, which has operations kind of across the globe and currency exposures.
So in those cases, again, we’ve got active hedging programs within the companies, and we’ll typically look to hedge exposures or our cash flows from the operations within the businesses. And I’d say, today, we’ve got a significant portion of that exposure hedged, which is not to say that we haven’t been impacted by some of the US dollar strength. And specifically, in some of our larger businesses, like Clarios, we’ve seen currency headwinds, large portion of that is from the euro. So there is some FX exposure and noise that it creates in the results. But if you step back overall, at a BBU level, it hasn’t been material. So in some of the businesses, it’s a bit larger than kind of a new step back and look at BBU. So I think in summary, we’ve got active hedging programs, most of our foreign currency exposure’s hedged but there are some headwinds, specifically from the euro that we are seeing, but not material to BBU.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Jaeme Gloyn with National Bank.
Jaeme Gloyn
First question, just thinking about organic growth and I guess operating leverage on an organic basis. Have you given it or you have any ability to provide some disclosures or additional color around how you’re thinking about organic growth rate, and the underlying operating businesses and their operating leverage? Is that something you can give us a little bit of range around, let’s say?
Jaspreet Dehl
So I’ll take a first crack, and then I know Denis and Cyrus want to add to it. So when we invest in our businesses, a large part of our investment thesis is around operational improvement of the businesses and improving EBITDA. And usually the bulk of that comes through cost initiatives that we’ve got planned. Revenue growth is typically not a large part of the equation. There are some smaller investments that we’ve made, which we think of more platform investments where we are seeing very strong organic growth and that is the focus area, as well as accretive M&A. But I say, and we give a little bit of color on this in our Investor Day at the end of September. On a same store basis, if you kind of normalize or take out the acquisitions that we’ve been doing, so far same store results have been pretty resilient. We’ve seen same store growth, both in revenue and EBITDA across the portfolio on a year-over-year basis. But as Denis eluded in his opening remarks, the operating environment in some areas is challenging and we’re very focused on kind of continuing to enhance and support underlying margins. Denis, anything you want to add to that?
Denis Turcotte
I’d add to that, by saying you’re right, in the sense that in environments like we’re in where we’re entering potentially recessionary environments, at least in some sectors, as not by loss of market share but just simply a reduction in orders, whether it’d be products or services. Clearly, we’re working against operating leverage in that regard. But again, as Jaspreet mentioned, not only though do we focus on costs very intensely, we also focus on applying the capacity we have in a smarter way. We do a lot of profitability analysis by product, by customer and geographically, and that three dimensional analysis often puts us in a position where we see the old 80/20 rule apply where 20% of our sales in effect are not as well placed as could be given fixed amounts of capacity. And what translates then in those cases, you end up getting higher revenue you get, but more importantly higher margin. So it doesn’t look directly like organic growth in unit count but it absolutely translates into higher revenue, higher EBITDA and higher free cash flow.
Jaeme Gloyn
And then the follow-up to that is in terms of free cash flow, and the growth in operating free cash flow. How are you thinking about the ability of the operating businesses to de-lever? Do you have any ins or forecasts as to what you would expect from maybe an absolute dollar basis, net debt to EBITDA basis? Any additional color like that, that you can sort of walk us through de-levering of the operating companies over the next several quarters?
Jaspreet Dehl
I can take a shot at answering that and then Cyrus can add to it. So when we think about leverage within the business, we really think about it from the perspective of each of our operating companies and every business is different. There’s some businesses where we’ve always operated them with a very low level of leverage just given kind of the underlying profile of the business, and there’s others, which are kind of more stable, contractual, in some cases, inflation linked businesses that have the ability to service a higher level of debt. We were obviously very closely monitoring the impact of higher interest rates on kind of the serviceability of debt in each of our portfolio companies and also, just in terms of deleveraging or refinancing where it’s appropriate. The business is generating a lot of free cash flow today, so it gives us with a lot of flexibility to be able to kind of manage that as it comes up. And based on kind of the current profile and the debt that we have in place, about 75 basis points impact has about $60 million, $65 million impact on EFO, and considering the run rate that’s a very small percentage. So we think the portfolio is very well set up to kind of manage through it. There will be some businesses that come up for refinancing that we’ll have to work through, but nothing that concerns us at this point, I mean that’s not manageable.
Cyrus Madon
I’ll just add one comment. If you look at what we’ve done consistently for years now, we’ve been able to increase free cash flow pretty well across the board, across our all of our companies. And what that really means is the businesses are deleveraging, earnings are going up, the level of debt stays the same. So debt to EBITDA is actually coming down over time just through improved earnings.
Operator
That’s all the time we have today for questions. I would now like to turn the call over to Cyrus Madon for closing remarks.
Cyrus Madon
Thank you very much for joining us today. We look forward to speaking to you next quarter.
Operator
This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Be the first to comment