Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) CEO Bonnie Lee on Q2 2022 Earnings Call Transcript

Hanmi Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:HAFC) Q2 2022 Earnings Conference Call July 26, 2022 5:00 PM ET

Company Participants

Larry Clark – Investor Relations

Bonnie Lee – President and Chief Executive Officer

Anthony Kim – Chief Banking Officer

Ron Santarosa – Chief Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Kelly Motta – KBW

Matthew Clark – Piper Sandler

Gary Tenner – D.A. Davidson

Matthew Erdner – JonesTrading

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Hanmi Financial Corporation’s Second Quarter 2022 Conference Call. As a reminder today’s call is being recorded for replay purposes. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions]

I’d now like to turn the call over to Larry Clark, Investor Relations for the company. Please go ahead sir.

Larry Clark

Thank you operator and thank you all for joining us today to discuss Hanmi’s second quarter 2022 results. This afternoon Hanmi issued its earnings release and quarterly supplemental slide presentation to accompany today’s call. Both documents are available in the IR section of the company’s website at hanmi.com.

I’m here today with Bonnie Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hanmi Financial Corporation; Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer; and Ron Santarosa, Chief Financial Officer.

Bonnie will begin today’s call with an overview, Anthony will discuss loan and deposit activities and Ron will provide details on our financial performance. And then Bonnie will provide closing comments before we open the call up to your questions.

Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that today’s comments may include forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are based on current plans expectations events and financial industry trends that may affect the company’s future operating results and financial position. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by our forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties.

Discussion of the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements can be found in our SEC filings including our reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q. In particular, we direct you to the discussion of certain risk factors affecting our business contained in our earnings release, our investor presentation and in our Form 10-K.

With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Bonnie Lee. Bonnie, please go ahead.

Bonnie Lee

Thank you Larry. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss our second quarter 2022 results. I am very pleased to report that we delivered another quarter of outstanding performance and results for our customers and our shareholders. A performance demonstrating excellent execution in all the facets of our business from loan production to deposit gathering from credit management to operations, all of our employees kept their focus on our strategic goals.

Net income was $25.1 million or $0.82 per diluted share, up 21% from our first quarter and 13% from a year ago. As you can see, our net income was solidly higher both sequentially and year-over-year. Our new loan production for the second quarter was exceptionally strong at $642 million driving the increase in our loans. Loans grew 6% on a linked quarter basis and 17% from a year ago and this growth occurred while applying our conservative underwriting standards.

Our deposits were up 3% sequentially and 6% year-over-year where core demand deposit relationships drove that growth. The growth in loans favorably shifted our earnings asset mix and the growth in our core deposits limited the increase in our overall deposit cost combining to drive quarter-over-quarter net interest income up by 16% and our net interest margin up by 45 basis points.

Notably, we address the compensation and incentives for our employees during the second quarter, while maintaining disciplined expense management leading to a nearly 1% decline in non-interest expense quarter-over-quarter. And importantly our overall asset quality metrics remain excellent. All-in-all these factors enabled us to generate solid earnings for the quarter and to deliver one of Hanmi’s strongest first half to a year.

We continue to make excellent progress on our strategic initiatives to grow and diversify our business. The investments we made over the past several quarters in Poland and technology continue to fuel our growth as was evident in the second quarter. We generated record loan production in our residential mortgage platform and in our equipment finance and our SBA groups.

The priority we placed on each of these key business lines is yielding the strong results we were seeking. For example, our residential mortgage business represented 17% of our total loan production exceeding our ramp-up targets of 10% to 15%. Our SBA Group generated record production of $68 million during the quarter, driven by intense focus on our small business relationships and we continue to gain solid traction with our corporate career initiative where both loans and deposits grew meaningfully quarter-over-quarter. The results are clear. Our growth strategies are working.

Finally, our overall credit quality continues to be excellent. Our delinquencies remain low, our non-accrual loans remain low and our net charge-offs remain low. Our special mention and classified loans fell 33% from the prior quarter and 42% from a year ago. Our allowance for credit losses, however, remains strong at 1.29% of loans, as we stand watchful for the possible effects of the uncertainties that could arise in this environment of rising interest rates.

Altogether, these results reflect our focus on high-quality loans, disciplined underwriting across the credit cycles and feasible credit administration practices. We remain prudent in our approach and we will not sacrifice credit quality as we grow.

With that, I will turn the call over to Anthony Kim, our Chief Banking Officer to discuss the second quarter loan production and deposit gathering in more detail.

Anthony Kim

Thank you, Bonnie. I’ll begin with additional details on our outstanding loan production where second quarter volumes reached a record $642 million up 27% from the first quarter and 38% higher than our second quarter production last year.

Our commercial real estate loan production was $271 million for the quarter and represented 42% of total production down from 46% for the first quarter. Originations consisted of mix of retail, multifamily, office, and industrial and warehouse properties.

As we’ve mentioned before, we continue to focus on prudent underwriting. Our commitment in this area is evidenced by our weighted average loan to value of 61% and weighted average debt service coverage ratio of 1.9 times for our second quarter CRE originations.

C&I production was $96 million, representing loans and lines to customers operating in a variety of industries. Commitments on commercial lines of credit increased to $902 million at the end of second quarter, an increase of $88 million or 11% from the prior quarter, and 28% year-over-year.

Outstanding balances on these lines also grew 32% between quarters resulting in a second quarter utilization rate of 47%, up from first quarter utilization rate of 39%. Equipment finance or lease production was a record $95 million for the second quarter, up 33% from the first quarter.

We continue to see business investment in equipment serving the needs of its transportation, construction and manufacturing industries. As Bonnie noted SBA 7(a) loan production also reached a record level coming in at $68 million for the quarter.

This continued growth can be traced back to our investment in banking talent over the last several quarters, which has enabled us to further penetrate this key market. Our second quarter residential mortgage production reached a record of $112 million for the second quarter despite the run up of interest rates.

We believe that our focus on the non-qualified mortgage loan segment or non-QM market aided our originations. With respect to our Corporate Korea Initiatives, we continue to make great strides on this strategic growth initiative.

Second quarter loan production was a very strong at $79 million up 52% from $52 million for the first quarter. Approximately 60% of lending in this segment was in CRE and the remaining 40% in C&I loans.

Our Corporate Korea portfolio has grown by 33% since last year above the pace we had expected for this new initiative to end the quarter at $742 million or 13% of our loan portfolio.

As Bonnie noted with our record loan production for the second quarter, our loan portfolio increased 6% from the previous quarter to $5.7 billion, and it grew 17% from the second quarter of 2021. In addition, I would like to point out that our exposure to the hospitality sector declined 28% since the start of the pandemic and now represents 12% of our loan portfolio.

The average rate on our new loan production in the second quarter was 4.35%, up 40 basis points from the first quarter. Payoffs were $231 million for the quarter, up from $181 million for the first quarter. However, the average rate on loan payoffs was 4.43% down two basis points from our first quarter payoff.

In summary, our efforts to further diversify our loan portfolio by industry, geography and loan time is paying off and the strategy is strengthening our business. Our focus on diversification will continue, which we believe will in turn drive incremental growth and profitability. Looking forward to the second half of 2022 against the backdrop of yet higher interest rates, we anticipate the loan production may normalize.

Now a word on deposits. Deposits at the end of second quarter reached $6.0 billion, the highest level in our 40 year of history. This result is a testament to the value that our customers place in our relationship banking model.

For the second quarter, deposits increased 3.4% driven primarily by a $104 million increase in non-interest-bearing demand deposits. The overall competition of our deposit base improved again this quarter as our efforts to drive DDA growth continue to work.

DDAs represented nearly 47% of our total deposits at the end of second quarter, up from 44% at year-end, and 42% at the end of the second quarter of 2021.

And now I’ll turn the call over to Ron Santarosa, our Chief Financial Officer for more details on our second quarter financial results.

Ron Santarosa

Thank you, Anthony. Let’s begin with net interest income, where Bonnie noted that we grew an impressive 16% sequentially and our net interest margin that jumped 45 basis points.

Net interest income was $59 million for the second quarter, driven up from the previous quarter from a combination of factors. Average loans increased 6.5% sequentially to $5.57 billion from our stellar loan production. The recent increase in the general level of interest rates pushed our loan and security yields higher. We no longer have the interest expense on our 5.45% subordinated notes, which we redeemed in the first quarter nor did we have the $1.1 million charge related to that redemption, and we funded our loan growth primarily with lower yielding cash balances.

Turning to our net interest margin, which was 3.55% for the second quarter, these same factors led to the 45 basis point increase from the previous quarter. We did see the 14 basis points save arising from the subordinated note redemption, which if you recall last quarter we indicated this would occur. Our yield on loans increased 13 basis points from the increase in the general level of interest rates as well as from a mix shift to C&I loans.

Our yield on earning assets also increased 34 basis points to 3.8% partly from the increase in interest rates, but also from the mix shift in earning assets where we use lower yielding cash to fund higher yielding loans. And importantly, our cost of interest-bearing deposits remained low at 31 basis points, increasing only five basis points from the previous quarter, while the cost of all deposits only increased three basis points in part because of the growth in our non-interest-bearing demand deposits.

Moving on, non-interest income was $9.3 million for the second quarter, up 9% from the prior quarter as we posted a 10% increase in our SBA gain on sales. The volume of SBA 7(a) loans sold for the second quarter increased 41% to $42 million, while trade premiums as expected declined 19% to 7.97% for the quarter. We also benefited from higher trade finance activity for the second quarter, pushing these revenues up 24% sequentially.

Non-interest expenses for the second quarter were favorable at $31.5 million, down just under 1% from the prior quarter. Our annual merit increases began at the start of the second quarter and with the continued strong loan production, we adjusted our estimates for incentive compensation, which taken together led to the 6% increase in salaries and benefits quarter-over-quarter. Offsetting this increase were beneficial declines in all of our other expense categories. So, with increased revenues and slightly lower non-interest expenses, our efficiency ratio for the second quarter improved to 46.05%.

We recorded a modest provision for credit loss expense of $1.6 million for the second quarter, primarily reflecting the growth in our loan portfolio. The allowance for credit losses was $73.1 million at quarter end, up slightly from the prior quarter, but lower relative to total loans at 1.29%. Specific allowances for loans declined $200,000, while our allowances based on quantitative and qualitative loss factors increased $1.8 million. Quantitative loss factors declined slightly, while qualitative loss factors remained essentially unchanged. However, these loss factors now begin to reflect the uncertainties of future economic conditions in a rising rate environment.

In sum, a great quarter with net income of $25.1 million, or $0.82 per diluted share a return on average assets of 1.45% and a return on average equity of 14.92%. The company and the bank exceeded minimum regulatory capital ratios and our ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets was 8.74%, down from the prior quarter that declined primarily due to the unrealized after-tax loss on our securities portfolio stemming from the increase in interest rates during the quarter.

Looking forward, we know that the cost of our non-maturity deposits rose at the end of June in response to the positive reaction to the Fed’s 75 basis point mid-June rate increase. The rates on our maturing time deposits have also inched upward over the second quarter increasing the cost of these deposits too.

For July to-date, our cost of interest-bearing deposits was about 30 basis points higher than the average rate paid for the second quarter or a beta of approximately 40% when measured against the June 75 basis point increase in the Fed funds rate. As you also heard, we anticipate that loan growth may moderate in the second half of the year, and we will learn tomorrow what the Fed’s next rate increase will be as well as their outlook for future rate increases. As such, if we were to anticipate, about 150 basis points of rate increases over the second half of the year, we would expect that our net interest revenues and net interest margin would begin to diminish from that for the second quarter before finding their new level in that higher rate environments.

In addition, we also expect that SBA trade premiums would decline and that too could diminish our SBA gains on sales. However with careful expense management, we anticipate that pre-tax, pre-provision earnings would remain very healthy.

With that I’ll turn it back to Bonnie.

Bonnie Lee

Thank you, Ron. Before moving to our outlook, I want to take a moment to thank the entire Hanmi team for their hard work and dedication to exceptional customer service and for consistently delivering solid financial performance. Our employees are the heart of our company, and I am very proud of all they have accomplished over the years including serving our communities.

Looking ahead, as you heard from Anthony and Ron, we are carefully watching the potential macroeconomic impact of a rising interest rate environment. Our loan pipelines have moderated somewhat from the second levels — from the record levels we saw in the first half and as a result, we expect our loan production in the second half of the year to turn to more historical levels. That said, we now anticipate that full year loan growth will likely be in the low to mid-teens.

During these times we are confident that our business model and dedication to customer service will position us well as we move forward. Our loan pipeline remains solid, our credit quality is excellent and our earnings and capital are strong. Our talented team brings a welcome banking experience to our customers, who know that they can rely on us in uncertain times as they have done over the last 40 years.

With a well-defined strategic plan in place and our ongoing focus on execution, we’re well positioned to continue to deliver disciplined growth and attractive returns for our shareholders.

With that we’ll open the call for your questions. Operator, please open the line up to the questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

Thank you very much. At this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Kelly Motta from KBW. Please proceed with your question, Kelly.

Kelly Motta

Hi. Good afternoon. Great quarter. And thanks for the question. I appreciate all the color on the deposit side and where we’re running in July. Just wondering, if you could give a bit more detail on where new CDs are coming in and just the competition you’re seeing with other players in the space?

Bonnie Lee

So Kelly, we are seeing that within our market, we see the 12-month CD money anywhere from 1% to 2%, and we’ll see how that would change after tomorrow.

Kelly Motta

Got it. That’s really helpful. And then I apologize if I missed it in the prepared remarks but I saw your criticized loans came down quite a bit. Can you provide any color as to the migration out of the special mention category what was driving that? That would be really helpful. And also if there’s any areas within your book that you’re watching a bit more carefully given where we are in the cycle. Thank you.

Bonnie Lee

Sure. I’ll answer the first part first. The improvement in the special mention category, it’s mainly due to three relationships that had moved out from the special mention categories. And some of them actually include — one other relationships actually include the partial paydown on the loans and also elimination of the any other concerns that we had to put them in a special management category.

Kelly Motta

Got it. That’s helpful. And any categories you’re watching more carefully or seeing early signs of…

Bonnie Lee

Sure. Yes I would expect additional rate increases. One of the areas I think that we are looking very closely is the unguaranteed portion of the SBA portfolio. So I think all the SBA lenders are very keenly focused on that. Having said that, we have only about $150 million on the SBA unguaranteed portion. Out of that $150 million, about little over $100 million is tied to the SBA CRE loans. So all in all, we’re not — although, we are mindful and watching it closely at the end of the day, the ultimate loss is probably pretty minimal.

Kelly Motta

Got it. That’s really helpful. Maybe a last one from me is just carrying on, on the SBA side. Gain on sale premiums have come in for you as well as at other banks. Is this a good level of gain on sale premium that you had this quarter, where the margins are? Is that a good level to assume on a go-forward basis or anything we should keep in mind that may make the margin come up or down relative to where it’s coming now?

Bonnie Lee

Right. So in the second Q, we saw the premium level around 7% to 8%, but I think it’s trending down. It was trending down earlier part of this month. However, in total it’s been stabilized. But still I think the expectation is to be around the 6% to 7% premium versus what we saw in the second quarter, which is 7% to 8%. However, for us with the talented bankers that we were able to acquire for the last couple of quarters, our productions have really picked up from our run rate of $35 million to $40 million every quarter, we actually produce our seven to eight notes, I think around $68 million.

So I think in terms of production, we’re going to have a higher production rate of hopefully $55 million and above. So although, overall the premium gain — premium market is trending down, hopefully that we will be able to deliver that level of gain that we had, but probably slightly lower for the immediate future.

Kelly Motta

Got it. Thanks again for all the color, Bonnie, and congrats on a great quarter.

Bonnie Lee

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. The next question comes from Matthew Clark from Piper Sandler. Please proceed, Matthew.

Matthew Clark

Hi, good afternoon. Maybe first on the margin outlook. Ron, I just want to make sure, I heard you correctly. I think you mentioned that you think the rising — the benefit of rising rates will diminish just given the higher cost of deposits going forward. But are you suggesting that 2Q was kind of the peak NIM, and we should see some decline from here? I know you have a decent slug of loans still re-pricing in the next quarter?

Ron Santarosa

Yes, Matthew. I think second quarter to put it in a short phrase revenues were pushed by higher interest rates. I think as we go into the third quarter, we’re going to see more of the pull of interest deposit costs. I think that as we’ve noted before betas aren’t linear. And so I just have a sense as we step into a higher rate environment you’re going to see a little bit more of a shock on the non-maturity deposits kind of stepping up before you start to see the benefit of those higher rates on the loan portfolio. So that gives me some pause, and I do think that net interest margin may diminish a bit.

Matthew Clark

Okay. Okay. Great. And then just shifting to the loan-to-deposit ratio up a little bit, but it sounds like loan growth is fully expected to slow here in the second half and you have some CD specials. Is — can you just remind us what your internal threshold is on the loan-to-deposit ratio and what you’re expecting for deposit growth for the balance of this year and maybe even into next year?

Ron Santarosa

So with respect to deposit growth, we had anticipated for 2022 low to middle single digits and it seems to be bearing out in that fashion. We’re particularly pleased that within that growth that’s really skewed to the DDA side of life rather than to the interest-bearing deposit side of life. So that helps moderate the aggregate cost of deposits.

So we anticipate that that growth will happen with respect to loan and deposit. We’re comfortable at that 90%, 95% level. We think we can still achieve that, although in this kind of, let’s say flex moment we’d probably be at the higher end of that range than at the lower end of the range. Again, until we know, where this interest rate environment will be I think we’re going to be in very choppy waters quarter-to-quarter.

Matthew Clark

Okay. Great. And then last one for me just on expenses. You guys have done a good job of holding the line there for the last few quarters. Any updated thoughts on the run rate? Anything unusual in the latest quarter?

Ron Santarosa

No. I think, again, we saw the — what we were expecting with respect to salaries and benefits being kind of the let’s say inflationary rates. We don’t expect that to repeat itself of course, but we do anticipate that the remainder of our components of non-interest expenses will probably be buffeted by I would call it normal market inflation ideas.

Matthew Clark

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. The next question comes from Gary Tenner from D.A. Davidson. Please proceed Gary.

Gary Tenner

Thanks. Good afternoon. I wanted to ask about the kind of loan growth outlook and call for moderation back half of the year. Obviously not dramatically different than what we’ve heard from most banks, but in terms of the segments as you think about the most likely areas of slowdown can you walk through where you think the production or net growth comes from over the back half of the year?

Bonnie Lee

Sure. I think overall from our commercial lending group to our SBA leasing mortgage just looking at the third Q pipeline in Q it has moderated. But I think that we’re — some of the, I guess additional decline slowness is probably the perhaps under CRE sector.

Gary Tenner

Okay. Thank you. And then in terms of the equipment finance portfolio it’s around 10% of your book and about half of that is trucking. Do you have any upward limit on concentration in that portfolio segment?

Bonnie Lee

So we are monitoring that the — I guess a specific sector within the equipment finance. But within that sector there really isn’t I guess a name concentration. So these are UPS trucks and in terms of average size, it doesn’t really warrant. So with our — from our overall loan portfolio, the entire leasing book is only about 10%. So I think we’re comfortable down the road we will make the decision accordingly.

Gary Tenner

Okay. Thank you.

Bonnie Lee

Sure.

Operator

Thank you. The next question comes from Jason Stewart from JonesTrading. Please proceed Jason.

Matthew Erdner

Hi. This is Matthew filling in for Jason. Congrats on a good quarter. So when it comes to non-QM mortgages, do you guys look to keep up the same volume there? And what is the available credit that you guys are willing to take on there?

Anthony Kim

Well, although the refinance market is really dampened, we still see purchase loan amplification coming in very actively. So we’ll continue to pursue the non-QM and our portfolio non-QM products.

Matthew Erdner

Got you. So I guess what are you looking there in terms of the credit box and as a consumer or a borrower there?

Anthony Kim

Credit box. Do you — are you referring to our perimeter of the credit?

Matthew Erdner

Yes.

Anthony Kim

We usually require 30% to 40% down payment on the — and that we verify 12 months of payment reserves not as a form of collateral but as a liquidity verification.

Matthew Erdner

Got you. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. The next question is a follow-up question from Kelly Motta from KBW. Please proceed Kelly.

Kelly Motta

Hi. Thanks for the follow-up. I just wanted to ask one on the deposit side. We’re seeing non-interest sale bearing roll off at a lot of other banks, but you notably had an increase. Just wondering if you’re starting to see a migration out of non-interest-bearing into higher rate deposits and it — how much of that increase was related to the deposit initiatives you are currently working on from Corporate Korea to other things that you’re doing? Thanks.

Bonnie Lee

Yes. Particularly in the second quarter the increase in the DDA it’s a combination acquisition of a new customer base in the Corporate Korea Initiative. And then also some of the fluctuations within the larger customer — larger average balance customers as well. But the key is that it’s a consistently growing in that sector and we do have a targeted market — target marketing initiatives for the Corporate Korea customer base as well as our general customer base in the businesses that we operate under.

Kelly Motta

Got it. Thank you so much for the color Bonnie.

Bonnie Lee

Sure.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. And now I’d like to turn the call back to Ms. Bonnie Lee for closing remarks. Thank you.

Bonnie Lee

Thank you for participating in our call today. We appreciate your interest in Hanmi and look forward to sharing our continued progress with you throughout the remainder of the year.

Operator

Thank you very much. This concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and thank you very much for your participation.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*