FRP Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPH) Q3 2022 Earnings Conference Call November 9, 2022 3:00 PM ET
Company Participants
John Baker II – Chairman and CEO
David deVilliers, Jr. – President
John Klopfenstein – Chief Accounting Officer
John Baker III – CFO
John Milton – General Counsel
David deVilliers III – Executive Vice President
Conference Call Participants
Emerito Quintana – Numantia
Curtis Jensen – Robotti & Company
John Koller – Oppenheimer+Close
Bill Chen – Rhizome Partners
Operator
Good day, everyone, and welcome to the FRP Holdings Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this call is being recorded, and I will be standing by if you should need any assistance.
It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to John Baker, II, CEO and Chairman of FRP Holdings. Please go ahead.
John Baker II
Good afternoon and thanks for joining us today. I’m John Baker, Chairman and CEO of FRP, and with me today are David deVilliers, Jr., our President; John Baker III, our CFO; John Milton, our General Counsel; David deVilliers III, our Executive Vice President; and John Klopfenstein, our Chief Accounting Officer.
Before I begin, let me remind you that investors are cautioned that any statements made on this call, which relate to the future, are by their nature subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. These include risks listed from time to time in our SEC filings, include, but not limited to, our annual and quarterly reports. We have no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements other than as imposed by law as a result of future events or new information. Listeners are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
This week we issued two press releases. One, our quarterly results for the period ending September 30, 2022, and another announcing an agreement with Steuart Investment Company and MRP Realty.
The first press release contained our quarterly results and outlook, which were very encouraging. Revenues for the quarter were USD9.294 million, up 9.7% from the same period last year. Net income was USD480,000, up 36% from a year ago, with increased rents and lower amortization charges moving the needle. Net operating income, which is our main internal barometer of success, was USD17.970 million in the 9 months ended in September, up 32% year over year. David deVilliers will walk you through our operations in more detail in a moment.
The second press release announced an agreement with Steuart Investment Company, our longtime partner MRP, and ourselves to combine our various properties in the Capitol Riverfront and Buzzard Point-Buzzard Point section of Southeastern Washington into a joint venture. These 10 properties, 3 of which include Dock 79, The Maren, and our newly completed project Verge which just began leasing. These projects are owned by MRP and ourselves. There are 3 undeveloped properties owned entirely by FRP, Phases 3 and 4 Riverfront and the Vulcan ready-mix plant in Buzzard Point. The final 4 are Steuart-owned parcels in Buzzard Point.
As we develop new projects, FRP and MRP will control the design, development, and financing of the projects, with FRP owning at least 40% of each and MRP 20%. Steuart will have the right to retain 10% to 35% of the ownership on their properties and the right to buy 10% to 20% of FRP and MRP’s properties. The Steuart properties are scheduled to be developed 1 every 4 years through 2035. The MRP-FRP properties can be developed whenever we so choose. The first deal will include our purchase of Steuart Phase 1 and Steuart’s purchase of 35% of our Maren and Dock 79 projects — excuse me, 20%.
The bottom line is that these 10 properties will have 3,000 apartments in 3 million square feet of mixed-use developments, all of which are contingent, except for some right of ways, and which comprise the entire southern entrance to the nation’s capital. FRP, in conjunction with MRP, will have control of when and if these are developed, how they are developed, and how they’re operated. This is one of the hottest apartment markets in the U.S. And by having control, we can make sure they are timed so as to maximize rents and absorption. We can control the design and quality of the projects, which will give this neighborhood a uniformly high level of beauty and quality that will ensure its reputation. By having MRP and Steuart coinvest in these projects, we’ve retained the predominance of control. And to the extent they invest, we’ve reduced the capital required by FRP.
Our people, especially David deVilliers III, working with Arnold & Porter, our attorneys, have crafted a deal that is fair to all and which carefully outlines the rights of the parties. In short, we all know where we stand, and we all are excited about it. This will transform FRP in a carefully controlled process over 2 to 3 decades. We believe it’s truly a deal made in heaven.
Now, if I could, let me ask our President, David deVilliers, to walk you through our ongoing projects.
David deVilliers, Jr.
Thank you, John, and good day to those on the call this afternoon. Relative to our in-house industrial platform, or Asset Management, net operating income for our in-house operations was USD693,000 for Q3 of ’22 versus USD486,000 in the same period last year, an increase of 48.1%. The second of our 2 spec buildings at Hollander Business Park completed at the end of 2021 and collectively totaling 145,500 square feet became fully leased in the third quarter. We expect full occupancy in the first quarter of 2023. Supply chain issues notwithstanding, the 101,750 square foot build-to-suit warehouse building that will cap off the final building at Hollander Business Park should also be ready for its tenant to occupy in the first quarter 2023. Cranberry Run Business Park, our renovated 268,000 square-foot multi-building warehouse park in Aberdeen, Maryland became fully occupied in the first quarter of 2022. This park remains 100% occupied and is performing ahead of original projections.
On the predevelopment front, we have 3 projects in the queue. This past quarter, we completed the annexation process of the 55-acre track in Harford County, Maryland, purchased in 2020. Building designed to create up to 675,000 square feet of warehouse product will follow in 2023. Existing land leases for the storage of trailers on-site helped to offset our carrying and entitlement costs. We are hopeful we can begin construction here in 2024.
We are also knee-deep into the permitting process to support an approximate 250,000 square foot warehouse building on our 17-acre parcel in the Perryman industrial section of Harford County, Maryland, not too distant from our other assets in Aberdeen. Depending on market dynamics, construction on this project could begin as early as Q2 2023.
Finally, during this quarter, we completed the purchase of 170 acres of industrial land in northeast, Cecil County, Maryland. This plot of ground will hold a 900,000 square foot distribution warehouse. Initial predevelopment entitlements have begun and assuming favorable market conditions, we expect to construct this building in ’24 or ’25. On completion of these 3 aforementioned land development projects, plus the build-to-suit warehouse due to deliver shortly at Hollander, we’ll add 1.8 million square feet of additional warehouse product to our industrial platform that when added to the assets in operation at Hollander Business Park and Cranberry will total over 2.2 million square feet.
As we look toward 2023, the increased occupancy at the new buildings at Hollander and the fully occupied Cranberry Run Business Park should provide a healthy lift to our NOI.
In our Mining and Royalty business segment, as John mentioned in his opening remarks, our Mining and Royalty division saw revenues for the quarter of USD2.471 million versus USD2.250 million in the same period last year. Net operating income was USD2.336 million, an increase of 10.34% over the same period last year, primarily due to the April purchase of the [Blandford Quarry] property in Lake County, Florida.
Moving on to our third-party joint ventures. Currently, we maintain both stabilized and projects under development with 3 distinct development partners, MRP Realty, Woodfield Development, and St. Johns Properties. As of 9/30/22, our joint venture platform includes 7 mixed-use and 1 office retail project in various stages of development and operation. 4 projects are located in D.C. where MRP is our joint venture partner. These projects are Dock 79, Maren, Bryant Street Phase 1, and Verse. Leasing is underway at Verge, and we welcomed its first tenant this month. Verge was 97% complete at quarter’s end. Dock 79 and Maren maintained better than 95% occupancies for the quarter, and the last retail suite at Dock 79 and 45% of the 8,500 square feet at Verge became leased during the quarter.
Our transit-oriented mixed-use project just north of Union Station in D.C., Bryant Street Phase 1 saw its residential occupancy increase to 86.7% and retail occupancy was 71.4% as of September 30. Our 2 mixed-use projects in Greenville, South Carolina, with Woodfield as our development partner, saw excellent progress. Riverside as 200 apartments, were 1 year old in August, and the project was 92% occupied as of the end of the third quarter. Riverside also became a stabilized asset in the third quarter, defined as more than 90% occupied for more than 90 days. 408 Jackson’s 227 apartments will be placed in service before the end of the year and were 98.6% complete at quarter’s end. This 4,539 square feet of retail is 100% pre-leased.
Few additional projects that make up the balance of our current third-party JV platform are Hickory Creek, our DST or Delaware Statutory Trust in Richmond, Virginia, and an office retail project in Baltimore, Maryland with St. Johns Properties. Hickory Creek’s 294 apartment units remained above 95% occupancy for the third quarter, while our JV with St. Johns, that includes 72,080 square feet of single-story office and 27,950 square feet of retail, remains 48% leased and occupied at quarter’s end.
As of September 30, 5 projects, including Dock 79, Maren, Verge, Riverside, and Bryant Street, totaled 1,600 apartments in operation, which represents a 47% increase over the third quarter last year when we had 1,085 apartments in operation. The remaining 227 apartments and retail spaces currently under construction will be completed and ready for occupancy by the end of this year. FRP’s share of the net operating income for these 5 projects was USD3.315 million for the third quarter of 2022 versus USD1.931 million in the third quarter of 2021, a 72% increase.
So to summarize, relative to our current third-party joint ventures and mixed-use developments, Hickory Creek and Windlass notwithstanding, we are currently invested in 6 mixed-use multifamily retail projects, totaling 1,827 apartments and 126,000 square feet of retail.
Finally, as a postscript to our third-party joint venture program, and as some additional commentary on John’s opening remarks, with our newly penned agreement with the Steuart Investment Company and our existing partners of 10-plus years, MRP Realty, we have a generational opportunity to create a unique waterfront destination among multiple projects, all controlled by a single ownership group with freedom to pursue alternate development plans that individual developments cannot consider. The new partnership will add some 2,000 apartments and approximately 2 million square feet of mixed-use development to the existing 913 apartments and 900,000 square feet we already have in Southeast Washington. Together, the parcels represent over 0.25 mile of uninterrupted waterfront along the Anacostia River at the southern entrance to our nation’s capital.
Predevelopment activities on Phase 1 conceptually planned for 400-plus apartments and 10,000 square feet of retail located on 1 of the 4 parcels that Steuart brings to the venture has commenced, and we anticipate a shovel-ready project sometime in 2023. In our lending ventures, our current lending venture project, Amber Ridge and PG County, Maryland is winding down. The total commitment to this project is USD18.5 million. The investment includes a charged interest rate and a minimum preferred return of 20%, above which a profit-induced waterfall determines the final split of proceeds. As of September 30, the horizontal development was complete. 124 of the total 187 lots, all of which are under contract of sale to national homebuilders have been taken down, with USD15.5 million inclusive of interest, have been returned to FRP as of 9/30/22.
In March of 2020 when the world shut down, FRP maintained a portfolio of 500,000 square feet of operating industrial, office, and retail space and 599 apartments. As of September of 2022, FRP had 660,000 square feet of operating industrial office and retail space and 1,894 operating apartment units with an additional 227 apartments and a 101,000 square feet of industrial due to deliver in the next 90 days. This does not speak to our additional development pipeline which is formidable in the industrial and mixed-use residential categories.
This is a period of tremendous growth for FRP and it is a story we are eager and proud to share. None of this growth or breadth of opportunity would be possible without the solid financial foundation that separates us from much of the competition, enables us to both capitalize on great projects, and sometimes make hard decisions not to.
Thank you. And I’ll now turn it back to John.
John Baker II
Thank you, David. Let’s now open it up for questions if we might.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Emerito Quintana of Numantia.
Emerito Quintana
Can you hear me?
John Baker II
Yes, we can.
Emerito Quintana
My name is Emerito Quintana, and I’m calling from Spain because our fund owns 1% of the shares of FRP Holdings, and I hope it will remain so for a long time. I would like to know how do you see the mining business in 10 years? What is your estimate of the growth of the price per ton of aggregates in the long term? And in the Florida quarries, how do you expect natural disasters such as hurricanes to affect the business in the long term?
John Baker II
Emerito, it’s nice to meet you, and we’re proud to have you as a shareholder. The quarry business in Florida, of course, I have no idea what’s going to happen over 10 years. But what we have seen is 2 things. One, the aggregates business throughout the United States has been growing well in excess of inflation even in today’s high inflationary times at Vulcan, and Martin Marietta reported, I think, 11% or 12% increase in pricing this last quarter. It’s an amazing time for that.
With mortgage rates rising, you would expect the homebuilding segment of their business to slow down dramatically. And that, of course, could affect the pricing and certainly the growth of that business. But it’s my belief that because rock is simply running out in Florida, it’s hard to permit in Georgia and Virginia, that we will continue to see pricing escalate at greater-than-inflationary rates for a period of maybe up to 10 years, certainly for the next 5 years.
Emerito Quintana
Okay. And the last one. I know you guys want to [steal] the stock when you can and be opportunistic with buybacks. But how do you see now the expected return of an eventual buyback?
John Baker II
Okay. We are carefully plotting the usage that we have going forward. And our preference is to invest in projects rather than to invest in our stock unless it just happens to be very low. And so especially with the Steuart joint venture, we will be very careful about buying stock in because we’ve got the need for that money going forward over the next 10 years. And so while I would never say we wouldn’t buy it in, we will if tempted too badly. But I think the prudent thing for us is to keep a good bit of cash available for future projects.
Operator
We’ll take our next question from Curtis Jensen of Robotti & Company.
Curtis Jensen
Can you hear me okay?
John Baker II
Yes, sir.
Curtis Jensen
I guess what strikes me about the Steuart announcement is, all of a sudden, you have control of this very large swath of property and you can — it’s almost as if you can create a master planned community at Buzzard Point, for example, where you could connect all these buildings architecturally and by resource and all those other things, it’s pretty interesting. Is that dynamic at work? And then I guess, and you referred to it, I guess you’ll be still — I’m wondering, will these projects be done in serial fashion or parallel fashion where you’ll have multiple projects going on? Or it’ll just depend on the environment? I guess, that’s my first question.
David deVilliers, Jr.
Well, I’ll take a run at the first part, Curtis. It’s David deVilliers. Obviously, this is an exciting program really for all of us. The thing that we really like about it, it’s a little bit like what you just articulated. We can create a masterplan community there. And like I think I said in my remarks is that we have the ability to do things that individuals can’t do. We can move properties around. We can come up with different types of development plans. We can combine lots. We can do all sorts of things because of the size and scope of this project. So yes, for all intents and purposes, it’s a clean slate, and we can pretty much do whatever appropriate urban design that we come up with. We’ll certainly have a lot of input from the Zoning Commission and the Office of Planning, but they’re pretty excited about dealing with one set of owners as well.
Relative to how they get developed, I think the market will dictate that action and just the logistics of development projects in different locations. For example, sometimes you want to build away from the water and then go towards it. But with the way we’re going to design the program, we don’t want to be having concrete trucks or something driving by any more buildings than we have to. So we control the development program for all intents and purposes. We do have a requirement to buy some of Steuart’s properties, as John articulated, over 10 years. But the other ones we pretty much determine when we want to do them. Theoretically, you could be doing two projects at once. The market’s going to dictate those actions as much as anything.
Curtis Jensen
Okay. What happens in terms of, let’s say, somebody [technical difficulty] or do you have this stipulated that the valuation is — that’s subject to a third-party appraisal on how that works?
David deVilliers, Jr.
I think you broke up, but I think you were saying, how do you determine what the value of the projects — the land will be…
Curtis Jensen
Is it a third-party appraisal type of thing?
David deVilliers, Jr.
Yes. We’ll go through an appraisal process for all of the properties when they are shovel ready, not before. So when these projects are shovel ready, we can get them appraised, we — we being the FRP-MRP; in the case of Steuart, the MRP-FRP people would get an appraisal, Steuart would get theirs. And if we didn’t come within a certain percentage, then we get a third one. So it’s an arm’s length program, but the properties will be appraised when they’re shovel-ready, not before. Also, whatever environmental issues are out there that gets reduced from the appraised process, which will be effectively for a clean parcel.
Curtis Jensen
Okay. And then I’ll wrap up here in a second. But I guess the specter of higher construction costs, higher borrowing costs has imposed some discipline on probably everybody. But I’m curious about with respect to Steuart whether you feel like you guys are getting married right now and probably for a pretty long time. Do you have a good philosophical alignment in terms of your outlook and how your approach is to life?
David deVilliers, Jr.
I think we do, as good as you can with three different groups, but we all have the same endgame. We all are investing a pretty sizable amount of dollars into these projects. And what really determines the go forward is having a shovel-ready project that makes economic sense. We have to do all the design. We have to get a guaranteed maximum price from the general contractor. We have to get appropriate and acceptable financing. And obviously, the market would have to dictate that the cost of these projects would give us the appropriate return on cost. So I think our interests are definitely aligned in that regard.
Curtis Jensen
But can you talk about or share what you think is first up in the queue?
David deVilliers, Jr.
Well, as I said in my opening remarks, we are partially through the predevelopment process on the first phase of this venture, which is on the Steuart’s property, on 1 of the 4 phases of Steuart. And it’s about 400-plus apartments, and I believe about 10,000 square feet of retail, then we’re going through, I guess, the song and dance with the Office of Planning and ultimately the Zoning Commission. And so once we get approvals and the appropriate entitlements there, then we would move forward with the drawings and then off to the guaranteed maximum price, and then see what kind of financing is out there and what the market will dictate, and decide at that time whether we want to go forward or just sit back and wait.
Curtis Jensen
Keep up to good work, guys.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] We’ll take our next question from John Koller of Oppenheimer & Close.
John Koller
My questions really are going to revolve around the pace at which you’ll be developing and how you’re thinking about capital allocation between what I consider a large number of balls in the air, so between the industrial, the next phase of Bryant Street, and now the new joint venture. And then that raises the question of what capital might you require? I know buybacks are probably not in the cards, which is fine. But it seems to me like you might actually need to raise capital depending on the pace at which you develop these. And I’m curious if you’ve considered that at all and how you think about that if it’s necessary.
John Baker II
David, you want to take a crack at that?
David deVilliers, Jr.
Yes. Obviously, one of the things that we like about this program, at least with Steuart, and then I’ll get back on the other ones, is that having these other partnerships, the other partners, it reduces the amount of equity that FRP would be putting into these projects. For example, when we did Dock 79, we started off at about 77% of the ownership and then at Maren it was 80%. And so now we’re going to be at 40%, so the equity that is required is going to be less. It’s still substantial, but obviously, it’s going to be less.
Another example would be Bryant Street, which is not in this [part] but in a different submarket, we have 61% of the ownership there. So one thing about the capital requirement, obviously, is that we will be putting up less money in equity. We do have an opportunity, if we so desire to add more because there might be a shortfall of anywhere from 10% to 15% of the equity. But going back to the question of how many balls you have up in the air. We are very conscious as to how our capital is utilized. And we want to make sure that there’s enough dry powder in the bank to stand off pretty much anything that comes out there. So we’re pretty darn conservative as it relates to how much money that we have invested at any one time.
As an example, one of the interesting programs that came about as a result of this is this first phase of Steuart, they purchased 20% of our ownership in Dock and Maren. So we’re using those proceeds, which is about USD20 million, and then some proceeds from another sale that came up to us after the third quarter to invest in that Steuart Phase 1. So the Board, in conjunction with ourselves like and probably more so, the Board has created a set of rails that we’re going to have to stay inside of. And if we get outside of that, we have to either delay projects or maybe even sell something in order to come up with the additional capital.
John Koller
Okay. So is it fair to assume then that this will be the primary focus? I would think Bryant Street and the new joint venture would occupy most of your time once you’ve got the industrial space lined up. I don’t think — maybe you would, I guess, still pursue development opportunities in industrial, or is that going to be less of a focus?
David deVilliers, Jr.
Well, as you can — one of the things we’ve always been pretty successful in our industrial program. As a matter of fact, it got us to pretty much to where we’re now when we sold all those apartments and industrial projects in 2018, and it gave us the seed money to take off in this new direction. But we’re still involved in industrial. As we said, we have — right now, all of our buildings that we have up, and even one of them that’s not up, is fully leased and will be occupied in the first quarter of 2023.
We have three — we do have three development projects in the queue for industrial. And the idea there is when we get them shovel ready, which is the same condition that we would be in these joint ventures, we take a look at the market, we take a look at our capital, and we decide either to go forward or maybe to stand down or even consider a partner. It’s not necessarily the time. For example, some of these big warehouses, the 675,000 square feet and the 900,000 square feet, we certainly may consider bringing a partner on, or we may not. The capital is — and maintaining the appropriate debt to equity is very important to our Board and to us. And so we’re pretty careful about protecting that cash and cash equivalents that we have.
John Koller
Okay. And then just really quick. The last one I have, I guess, is on Bryant Street. You’re reaching a point where you may get stabilization soon; hopefully, very soon. And I’m curious what the timeline is for the next phase and how large that might be. I know you only developed a small portion of it.
David deVilliers, Jr.
Well, it’s interesting. We have a ways to go before we feel good about going forward with the next phase. This is a transit-oriented program. And the transit-oriented side got destroyed by COVID and everyone is still tried to dig out. We want to make sure that the retail is up and fully operating. We still have it 71% leased and occupied, but we want to make sure that it stays that way and grows to 90%. We’re at 80-some percent in the 3 residential buildings.
So we’re going in the right direction, but we still have a ways to go before we would really feel comfortable with moving on with either Phase 2 or 3. And as it relates to Phase 2, preliminary plans show approximately 200 apartments, which would be bolted on to the side of a property that we already — that we don’t have yet, but we have an open option to buy the remaining property that would make up the whole. So we don’t have a gun to our head as to whenever we have to buy that property. In fact, the owner of that property is one of our partners. So we can pretty much decide at the appropriate time when Phase 2 would happen, but it’s all a matter of what we believe is the right use for our capital and how much we spend.
John Koller
Okay. And then — this is the last question, I promise. Are you under any timelines being in Opportunity Zone where you have to get something additional completed? Or is that [indiscernible] requirement?
David deVilliers, Jr.
No. We’re done with that. We’re just — we’ve got to pay taxes in ’27 and we got to hold it till ’29. That’s really all we have to do.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] We’ll take our next question from Bill Chen of Rhizome Partners.
Bill Chen
Can you guys hear me?
John Baker II
Yes, sir.
Bill Chen
I’m driving on the highway, so — but my main question, I haven’t had a chance to digest the press release, but my main question is, the cash on the balance sheet, I believe that’s mostly in Treasuries right now. What’s the breakdown of the maturity date on that? And as rates have gone up significantly since last time, are we able to take the mature amounts and reinvest that like 1/4 or 1/2 right now in the less than 12 months. Could you give me some color on that?
John Klopfenstein
Bill, it’s John Klopfenstein here. So we’ve got all the cash invested in Treasuries, as you said, the vast majority of it is in 6-month Treasuries, and we’ve got some that are coming mature every week or 2. So just this week, we’ve invested at 4.6% for 6 months. So that’s our go-forward plan.
Bill Chen
Got you. That’s great to hear. I thought I read in the disclosure that you have some duration that goes out to as long as 2 years. Like is there like — is there — how much of it is like longer than 1 year?
John Klopfenstein
We did do — early on, we did USD48 million of 2-year Treasuries and those now are set to mature at the end of 2023. Everything else is 6-month Treasuries that’s maturing on a biweekly basis, more or less.
Operator
And at this time, it appears we have no further questions in queue. I will now turn the floor back over to Mr. Baker for any additional or closing remarks.
John Baker II
Thank you, all, again, for joining us. I really do believe this is a historic moment in the development of our company, which will allow us to add more — some really immense value by building projects in a slow, and well-timed basis in this great market for decades. And I’d like to comment about — it sounds like we’ve got a lot of balls in the air. We’re trying — we have been very meticulous about laying out the timing of these projects, phasing them, whether it’s industrial, whether it’s mixed use.
And we feel very good about our ability over a long period of time to do that without raising money or certainly without getting in trouble. We all know the world has a funny way of changing quickly, and we want to make sure that we have, a, the cash reserves to change with it if it does change, especially in a negative fashion. And you can be assured that while we are enamored by the fact that we can grow this company in an amazing way over a 10- to 15-year period, that’s not what — we’re not going to get in a hurry that would ever put us in a financial bind. That’s rule number one around here. So I appreciate you all’s interest. I think we’re all for a good ride, and I look forward to talking to you next quarter.
Operator
This concludes today’s conference call. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.
Be the first to comment