Banco Santander S.A. (NYSE:SAN) Q2 2022 Earnings Conference Call July 29, 2022 4:00 AM ET
Company Participants
Begona Morenes – IR
Jose Antonio Alvarez – CEO
Jose Garcia Cantera – CFO
Conference Call Participants
Alvaro Serrano – Morgan Stanley
Ignacio Ulargui – BNP Paribas
Pamela Zuluaga – Credit Suisse
Sofie Peterzens – JPMorgan
Benjie Creelan-Sandford – Jefferies
Ignacio Cerezo – UBS
Carlos Peixoto – CaixaBank
Andrea Filtri – Mediobanca
Carlos Cobo Catena – Societe Generale
Britta Schmidt – Autonomous Research
Begona Morenes
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Banco Santander’s conference to discuss our financial results for the first half of 2022.
Just as a reminder, both the results report and the presentation we will be following today are available to you on our website. I’m joined here today by our CEO, Mr. Jose Antonio Alvarez; and our CFO, Mr. Jose Garcia Cantera. Following their presentations, we will open the floor for any questions you may have in the Q&A session.
With this, I will hand over to Mr. Jose Antonio Alvarez. Jose Antonio, the floor is yours.
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Thank you, Begoña, and good morning to everyone. Thank you for joining us this morning. So well, I should start saying that the second quarter, we’ve been living in a period in which we saw inflation hitting decade high levels, interest rates going up, start to raise, and significant concerns regarding lower economic activity in the future. So this is to sum up a little bit the environment of the last quarter.
In this environment, we continue to grow our business, our customer base, and we translate this into growth in the loans and deposits and revenues in our P&L NII plus fees, as you can see in the slide. So the progress in the digital front has been significant in the quarter.
When we talk about profitability, second quarter profit was €2.4 billion, reaching for the first half €4.9 billion, 33% higher than the previous year. If we look in the cost on euros is 21% higher than the previous year. The cost, in a highly inflationary environment, remained well below inflation, and our efficiency ratio stood at 45.5%, in line to reach our end of the year target of 45%.
We improved our profitability ratios, the return on tangible equity stays at 13.7%, and we continue to create significant value for our shareholders. EPS grew 38% compared to the previous year, and tangible net asset value per share plus cash dividend per share grew 9% year-on-year.
In regard with the strength, the quality of the balance sheet, NPLs continued to trend down, the cost of which remains well inside our expected range, and our capital is a slight level of 12%, the core equity Tier 1 following a strong net organic generation of 18 basis points in the second quarter.
As I have just mentioned, our commercial strategy were reflected in widespread growth. As you can see in the slide, we’ve been growing in individuals, both in mortgages and consumer and others in mid- to high single digits, less so in the corporate space where we are seeing relatively flattish loan book in SMEs and corporates, while consumer — corporate investment bank is growing at 13%.
So overall, loans were up 2% quarter-on-quarter, €21 billion in the quarter, with increases in all countries, mainly from mortgages and consumers, as I said.
So in summary, I think, we have a high-quality, well-diversified portfolio by market. And our CFO, Jose, will explain later on in more detail the portfolio by geographies and by collateral.
On the other hand, the deposits grew 1% quarter-on-quarter and 5% year-on-year, with a market shift towards time deposits due to the interest — the new interest rate environment.
Turning to the income statement. Well, let me first give you a brief overview of the main ideas. The performance in euros was better than in the currencies due to the depreciation of euro, although we have a negative partially was offset by the hedging included in the corporate center. This is included in gains on financial transactions.
In constant euros, talking in constant euros we grew revenue 4% year-on-year at a faster pace than in on the back of higher volumes, interest rate hikes starting to feed through in some countries together with another strong quarter in CIB. Cost management face inflationary pressures but continue to grow well below inflation. This allowed us to achieve record pre-provisioned profit of €14 billion in the first half of this year.
As for loan loss provisions, the releases recorded in the U.K. and U.S. in second quarter ’21 affected the year-on-year comparison. Finally, we had a positive impact from minority interest following buybacks in Mexico and the U.S. and lower tax burden mainly in Brazil due to the recovery from tax contingencies and others. This led to a record first half profit of €4.9 billion in 2022. Attributable underlying profit recorded the same amount as we don’t have extraordinary charges in this first half of the year.
If we look from ideas in Europe, we continue to accelerate our business transformation towards a common operating model. This was reflected in a customer growth year-on-year increasing nearly by 300,000 in the quarter. Double-digit growth in net operating income and profit, return on tangible equity improved to 8.8%.
In North America, we are focusing our position in the U.S. while maintaining a disciplined capital allocation. We accelerate growth volumes. Loans rose 7% in most segments in Mexico and in auto and CIB in the U.S. We also increased our customer base 3% year-on-year. Lastly, we achieved a profit of €1.6 billion in the region.
South America, we are leaders in the region with a unique presence strengthened by the group assets and delivering profitable growth. Our growth strategy, based on increasing customers, 6 million year-on-year, and capturing new business opportunities led to a sharp increase in volumes. Loans grew 12% and deposits 5%. First half underlying profit over €1.9 billion, 7% year-on-year, and higher return on tangible equity reaching — staying above 20%.
In Digital Consumer Bank, we continue to strengthen our leadership position as reflected in new lending, we rose by 10% in a shrinking market. Profit rose to double digits, and return on tangible equity is increased to 12%.
If we look at performance metrics, efficiency ratio, I already elaborated on this. We are running at 45.5%. Now heading towards our target of 45% for the year-end. Return on tangible equity, we are slightly ahead of our target for the whole year at 13.7%. And this is a — we are on track to meet our 2022 target.
In terms of EPS, €0.27 in the quarter, 38% year-on-year, 19% versus first half of 2021 in underlying earnings per share. We have — we are showing sustained earnings per share growth, mainly if we take into account that we amortize almost 550 million shares through the buybacks. That is approximately — slightly above 3%, 3.2% of our capital. The tangible net asset value per share was €4.24, including cash and dividends, it was in line with the previous quarter and 9% higher year-on-year.
When it comes to capital, the organic capital generation was in line with our expectations. Net organic, 18 basis points, if we take into account the payout of 40% in the half in cash dividend and cash buyback. We are generating roughly speaking, 10 basis points after taking into consideration the buyback. That is in line with our expectations then per quarter. This quarter is not show up in the total capital ratio due to the fact that the held to collect and sale mark-to-market detracts 13 basis points on our capital, and this offset the growth in the organic generation.
So we are meeting our targets here, risk-weighted assets grow below loan growth. We show that this is — this is one of our target, better profitability in the front book and reducing the weight of risk-weighted assets, producing a return on equity below the cost of equity. We are progressing well on those targets, and this is shown in our profitability.
Finally, before I hand to Jose, I would like to highlight Santander’s strong commitments in ESG. Mainly, I want to refer to new targets we published just a couple of weeks ago on top of the already existing targets in relation with power generation and coal. We published specific targets for energy, aviation and steel, reduce the absolute level of emissions in the region of 30% for the relevant period from 2019 to 2030.
Well, you have the figures on we are progressing Green Finance, and we appointed a new head of refinance in order to first to measure properly, to classify properly according to European taxonomy our loan book and to generate a business and help our customers to a greener economy for all our customers.
Well, as you know, we have — we are very active in the social front, particularly in Latin America with Financially empowered people. You have the figures in the presentation. Overall, I’m proud of the group progress on delivering in our responsible banking commitments to help to tackle global challenges, both in the climate front and in the social front.
I will now hand to Jose to elaborate on the group and business areas with you. And finally, I will do some final remarks.
Jose Garcia Cantera
Just provided a brief overview of the main highlights for the quarter, and I will go into more detail about the P&L of the group and the progress of the country and business areas.
In the quarter, we earned €2.4 billion after recording regulatory charges of nearly €500 million, €400 million for the resolution fund and €88 million contribution to the new institutional protection scheme in Poland.
In the first half, total income exceeded €25 billion. Both NII and fee income grew at 7% in constant euros and accounted for 97% of total income. Trading gains and other income decreased 40% compared to last year, mostly affected by FX hedging, which attracted €300 million and also from lower lease income ALCO portfolio sales in ’21, higher regulatory contributions. In the quarterly performance, we saw similar trends, revenue up 4%, excluding regulatory charges.
Let me take a moment to go through the main drivers of NII in more detail. Group NII was supported by broad-based growth in loans and deposits, coupled with margin management and interest rate hikes in U.K. and Poland. As a result, net interest income and net interest margin increased from 2.38% last year to 2.49% in the first half of this year. You have all the information on the slide, but I would like to highlight the following by country.
We had very strong NII in the U.K. and Poland, as I mentioned, because these are the 2 countries where we see the impact of higher rates in Europe. We also had robust activity in both countries. Spain and Poland, we decreased NII by 6% and 8%, respectively, despite the rise in volumes due to the continued pressure on yields and lower ALCO portfolios.
In the U.S., NII was affected by the Bluestem portfolio disposal and consumer loan pricing competition. Mexico, NII, up 9% due to strong loan growth in individuals and corporates. And finally, in Brazil, NII rose 2%, backed by volume growth and credit mix, which was particularly offset by negative sensitivity to initial rate hikes. We expect this negative impact from liability repricing to level out in the fourth quarter of this year and turn positive into next year.
Regarding fees, we had very positive performance in all regions, supported by greater activity in high value-added products and services, as you can see on the right-hand side of the slide. All countries increased the income with the exception of the U.K., which was affected by the transfer of the CIB business to the London branch. It would have been flattish, excluding this impact, and in the U.S., affected by the Bluestem disposal and lower overdraft fees.
In terms of costs, we kept our target of growing costs below inflation while improving efficiency. In Europe, costs were down 7% in real terms, with widespread falls across countries, and the efficiency here improved 4 percentage points. In summary, we continue to make structural changes to our operating model to drive new productivity improvements in the future.
Turning to risk. The group maintained positive credit quality ratios. The NPL ratio was 3.05%, 21 basis points better than in the quarter than in the previous quarter, and most markets improved. In Spain, it fell 64 basis points due to portfolio sales. Total loan loss reserves stood at €24 billion, and the loan loss coverage at 71%, up 2 percentage points in the quarter.
The distribution of the loan portfolio by stages remained stable and even Stage 3 assets were lower in the quarter. Our cost of credit stood at 83 basis points. This is last 12 months. If we look at the first 6 months of the year, the cost of risk was 91 basis points, in line with our target for the year.
I would like to drill a little bit deeper into loan loss provisions and cost of risk performance. By country in Europe, all countries remain below 1% or were negative. In Spain, cost of risk improved due to lower loan loss provisions and better portfolio quality. U.K. and Portugal, slightly positive considering only 6 months. In Poland, improved provisions, BAU provisions, but cost of risk was affected by the contribution to the Swiss franc mortgage portfolio.
The U.S. cost of risk below 1% after the 2021 releases. Loan loss provisions are up year-on-year but still well below pre-pandemic levels. In Mexico, cost of risk improved slightly — I mean, significantly, thanks to a better-than-expected performance of the loan portfolio.
In Brazil, the cost of risk increased, primarily in our secured individuals, which represents around 20% of the portfolio. Secured individuals, SMEs and corporates, which represent 80% of the total portfolio were stable. The coverage ratio over 90 days is well above pre-pandemic levels. We are better positioned than in the previous crisis as we increased the individual secured portfolio, we have less volatility than the market, and checque especial decreased its weight compared to previous crisis.
In digital consumer, cost of risk improved and continue to show outstanding low levels, considering the nature of the business.
Finally, I would like to show you a brief overview of our loan portfolio. It’s most concentrated in mature markets, around 80%. In developing markets, Brazil accounts for just 9% of the group total. And 65% of the total portfolio is secured, mostly by real estate collateral.
By segment, mortgages with loan to values below 80% account for 90% of the total. The consumer lending portfolio is very well collateralized and is a very short-term duration. SMEs and corporates is covered with 50% real guarantees. And lastly, 65% of our corporate portfolio, large corporate portfolio is rated investment grade and 42% is traded above A minus, a very good quality portfolio.
Let me now make some brief comments about the evolution of our main units in 2022. In Spain, year-on-year results were driven by lower costs, 4%, and reduced cost of risk in an environment of weak revenue performance. Looking forward, we expect trends to continue for the second half. NII should absorb the impact of TLTRO cancellations. But in 2023, we expect to reflect asset repricing delivering margin expansion. Fee income should remain robust in the second half. Costs should maintain its downward trend, pointing to achievement of our cost-to-income target. And cost of risk is expected to remain around 55 to 60 basis points for the year.
In the U.K., we also maintained very positive dynamics in new lending and strong NII. Looking forward, we expect these trends to continue with NII growing well, although probably at lower rates than until today, flat costs and cost of risk normalization close to around 10 basis points.
In the United States, results compare — 2022 results compare to high financials in ’21. Nevertheless, in the first half, profit remained very, very high, above €1 billion. Our outlook for ’22 is lower revenue impacted by lease businesses, cost slightly up, partially due to the incorporation of Amherst Pierpont, and better than initially anticipated cost of risk well below normalized levels.
Santander Mexico had another excellent quarter. For the year as a whole, we expect higher NII and fees, costs up, impacted by investments in digitalization and higher inflation and cost of risk below 2.5%, supporting a credit quality that is better than average.
In Brazil, in the first half, when we had a negative impact due to our balance sheet’s initial negative sensitivity to higher rates, higher inflation that is putting pressure on costs and the cost of risk that deteriorated in unsecured loans to individuals, we earn a 21.5% return on tangible equity. We expect to end 2022 maintaining efficiency around 30% and cost of risk below 4% to 4.5%, which will result in a return on equity around 20%. All in all, in a difficult year, we expect a strong set of results and profitability, and we are optimistic for 2023 when we expect to see an improvement in revenue.
In the Digital Consumer Bank, new business activity increased 10% year-on-year. We gained market share, particularly in used cars. Looking forward to the second half, the environment will continue to be challenging, but we are confident in meeting our goals and expect a record year in new business, exceeding the previous record of €49 billion in 2019. We expect some normalization from the current low cost of risk rate but should remain well below previous normalized levels because, in this case, cost of risk has to do more with unemployment than with interest rates, and we expect a strong labor market in Europe, in general, in the coming years.
CIB delivered another very strong excellent quarter. In the coming quarters, we expect to continue to gain market share, increasing revenue through excellent dynamics in structure finance and project finance, transaction volumes on markets where we are protecting the value of our trading books. Wealth Management and insurance, despite market volatility, results grew 15%.
In Private Banking, we had new net money inflows of €6 billion. In asset management profits rose 8%. And in Insurance, gross written premiums rose 17%. Looking forward, we expect to maintain double-digit growth in profit contribution across the 3 businesses.
In PagoNxt, total revenue in the first half surged 87% year-on-year on the back of our 4 main business segments, especially merchants and trade. Activity is evolving very well, and we believe we will meet our plus 50% revenue target for the whole year.
Finally, in cards, we managed 96 million cards throughout the group, and revenue grew 28% year-on-year to circa 12 — sorry, €2 billion, with double-digit growth in America and Europe. We expect to continue to grow turnover and revenue at high double digits in the coming months.
Let me now turn it back to Jose Antonio for his closing remarks.
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Thank you, Jose. Let me try to guide you to take a look forward, how do we see the group evolving in the coming quarters. So on one side, on the revenue side, we have an environment in which NII should increase in the coming quarters, benefiting mainly from interest rate hikes. Normally the interest rate hike takes for a while to show up in the P&L. It starts and accelerate later on. And with the expected activity levels, we expect a significant acceleration of the revenues, particularly in 2023. You will see some of this. You are already seeing some of this clearly in Poland and U.K. where the rates start to go up faster. And we will see next year basically a strong acceleration, a significant acceleration on the back of higher rates in Eurozone and also in Mexico and in other countries.
So fee income, Jose mentioned how our thing on generating business are evolving. You saw both wealth management and insurance and CIB that are the main fee income generators. We are gaining share clearly in CIB space, that is performing very well. And we are also doing very well in private banking and insurance, where we think that we can grow in wealth management and insurance well into double digits. So for that reason, I am relatively optimistic about the commercial activity that generates fee income. So positive in revenues.
On cost, well, with clearly a higher inflation than one we were expecting, but while we have a track record and we continue to think that we’re going to be able to increase the productivity and to evolve really the cost well below inflation as we are doing quarter after quarter, naturally, some of the inflation is going to go through the cost base, particularly in those countries with high inflation. But we feel that productivity gains and cost management will allow us cost growth well below inflation.
In asset quality, in this environment, as you know, I may have published some number yesterday or the day before yesterday, I don’t remember exactly. And where there is an erosion of the expectations on the GDP. And naturally in this environment, the discussion is if there is a recession coming or not, some of this credit quality duration, as you know, IFRS 9 required us to anticipate potential deterioration.
In the first half of the year, we’ve already done in our provisions, some of this, around €600 million or something like that for deterioration. But we see, given our loan portfolio structure, the high household savings rates, the lower unemployment rates and the resilient real estate prices as a protection in our portfolio. For this year, we feel comfortable that we’re going to be right our range that we gave to you, less than 1%, we are running up 91 basis points, and we feel comfortable with our target for the year.
In capital, our commitment is to stay at or above 12% in every quarter and having disciplined capital allocation and will reflect this in the higher profitability. So we are there. And the capital generation of the group, other than the mark-to-market of held to collect and sales, has been good in the quarter, and my impression is that continue to be good and will continue generating capital on a continuous basis, and this will translate into to our shareholders where our commitment is to have a 40% payout for this year, although we hope to increase closer to 50% in the future. That is what we communicated to you in our shareholder meeting.
So well, just to reiterate our commitments for the year, both in terms of efficiency, return on tangible equity and core equity Tier 1, we feel comfortable. We feel that we can reach those targets this year. And for the future, I think that the revenue increase will be more than will offset the potential higher cost and potential increase on cost of risk. So I’m positive on the capacity of the group to generate profits in the future.
That’s it. Now we remain at your disposal for the questions you may have.
Begona Morenes
Thank you, José Antonio. We’ll open now the floor for any questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operator Instructions] We already have our first question from Ignacio Ulargui from BNP Paribas Exane.
Next question is coming from Alvaro Serrano from Morgan Stanley.
Alvaro Serrano
Hopefully, you can hear me. I’ve got two questions, one on Brazil and another clarification on your last comments on capital. On Brazil, I heard Jose mention that you keep the 4% to 4.5% cost of risk. But if I look at Q2 stand-alone, cost of risk, I think, is 525 basis points. And it looks like to achieve your guidance for the full year in the second half, you’d need to be below 400 basis points. So I just want to make sure I’ve understood the guidance correctly, and maybe you can give a bit of color what’s going on because it’s probably a steeper increase than we were expecting, although you had flagged that the peak will be in Q2. But maybe a bit of color on what’s going on, and if I got those numbers right.
And the second question on capital, the 50% you mentioned Jose Antonio, is that — can we expect that already in 2023? Or another way to ask it, is there anything we need to take into account that might prevent you from raising it to 50%, i.e., remaining capital headwinds. I think for 2023, you already said there isn’t any left. But I don’t know if there’s anything in the second half. Conscious that Banamex is no longer on the table, so I just can’t see any reason why you shouldn’t increase it to 50%.
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Okay. Thanks, Alvaro, for your questions. On Brazil, well, Jose already elaborated on this, let me to go in more detail. As Jose said, we are seeing an increase in cost of raising the consumer mass market portfolio. You rightly said in the second quarter was higher than in the first quarter. Having said that, we remain comfortable with the guidance we gave to you. It’s true that if we go — we saw already in June better results than we saw in the third — in the 3 or 4 previous months, and we remain constructive, and we think that we are in control of this, and this to remain in this range.
As you know, we reduced the lending last year. Jose already mentioned that our exposure to the most — the overdraft that is the part of the higher cost of risk has been reduced, and we feel comfortable with our expectations for the year, mainly taking into account that Brazil has been one of the few countries in which expectations for GDP growth have been improved by the IMF, yes? So the situation in the country is that we face elections by October. But in general, we see the situation for a more constructive point of view. And we think that with the measures we took and with the trends we are seeing, we’re going to stick with this 4%, 4.5% cost of risk for the whole year.
We are not seeing any sign of deterioration other than the ones we saw before. So we are seeing the corporate book performing very well. We are seeing — including SMEs, and it remains related with the individual portfolio consumer. And inside the consumer, auto portfolio improves already. It is more unsecured consumer that is still causing this spike in the cost of risk.
And second question, well, it’s true that we don’t — we said that we don’t have headwinds going forward in our capital. What I’m stating here is what we stated in the AGM, the intention of the Board to go to 50%. When is this going to happen? Well, it’s up to the Board. I am not in a position to anticipate a decision that is going to be taken by the Board, but this is the clear intention of the group is to go back to these levels and continue to use the buybacks and the combination of buybacks and cash dividend as we’ve done in the last year.
Jose Garcia Cantera
If I may give you a bit of color about the regulatory charges in the second half. In the first half, we had 5 basis points in the first quarter. The plus 3 basis point in the second quarter has 2 components. It’s plus 7 basis points from the nonperforming loan backstop difference and minus 4 basis points from models. So from pure regulatory, we have around 9, 10 basis points already accounted for, and we would expect another 10, 15 basis points in the second half. So very much in line with the guidance we gave you at the beginning of the year for 20 or 25 basis points total regulatory charges in the year as a whole.
Operator
The next question is coming from Ignacio Ulargui.
Ignacio Ulargui
You hear me now?
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Very well, indeed.
Ignacio Ulargui
Okay. Perfect. Sorry for the problem before. Just have one follow-up question on Mexico. Just following the sort of like the outcome of Banamex, what is the strategy that you plan to follow there? And what are the priorities for the bank, in terms of organic growth, in which segments you think that you can gain market share?
And the other question is on cost of risk at a group level? I mean, you have given a bit of a comfort about Brazil. I mean, is there sort of like any other market where do you think that there could be sort of like would you envisage some deterioration that could total risk but below 100 basis points cost of risk guidance for 2022?
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Okay. Thank you, Ignacio, for your question. Mexico, what’s the strategy? Well, as you say — rightly said and we communicated to the market, our strategy is organic growth. When we look at our franchise in Mexico, we have overall 13%, 14% market share, enough scale to compete efficiently in a market and no doubt about this.
When you look in more detail where we’re going to focus more on individuals. So when you look at the market shares all across, it’s true that we — our market share in the corporate space is higher than it is in the individual space, particularly on the — for the reason the organic growth is going to be focusing growing the customer base, individual, that should fit through in the balance sheet through a larger deposit base, individuals deposit base, I mean, and through a larger share, particularly on the consumer.
We are growing in auto. We started 3 years ago. We got already 14% market share, and we’re going to continue to grow in the consumer space, but also in credit cards, where we launched in September last year a new car that is selling 100,000 cars a month, and we are growing well there, and we expect the growth to accelerate — is accelerating. If you look at the numbers, at the balance sheet at the P&L is accelerating, and we continue — we expect to continue to do this acceleration. So in short, we’re going to focus more on the individual side, where we need to grow the deposit base and also in the consumer finance space and credit cards.
In mortgage market, market share is around 18%, 19%. We are well above our average market. We are doing well there. But those are going to be the focus. It remembers me a little bit the situation we faced in Brazil a couple of years ago when Bradesco bought HSBC. And on the back of this, we were able to gain 2 or 3 percentage points market share in Brazil in a very difficult time in Brazil at the time, Brazil was in recession at that time, and we were able to profit from this situation. And we expect — we are doing already on the back of the process now, and we expect to continue to do in the coming years.
Second question, cost of risk, more general question, not that much focused in Brazil as your colleague, Alvaro, I already elaborated on Brazil. You mentioned other markets, other markets. The cost of risk is going up in Brazil for the situation I explained and is going up also in the U.S. It’s back to normal in the U.S. In the U.S. in 2021, the cost of risk was abnormally low, well below expected across the cycle, and we are in some kind of normalization.
It’s going according to our plans in — well, you know that the cost of risk largely depends on the auto market, and the auto market remains in a situation that is not — I don’t know how to qualify, not normal, in the sense that the availability of new cars is not there, and the used car prices remain at all-time highs, I think. And this situation creates a market where the cost of risk is still unemployment is very low.
Well, inflation helps to pay the bills in the short run, and this will keep the — for the time being, the normalization is going to happen little by little in the U.S. But this, the other market, if you go to the numbers, you see the cost of risk going up. In all the other markets, I don’t see any sign of deterioration. Quite the opposite.
In Spain, we are trending down. We expect to continue to go down this year and next year, while the in consumer, we are not seeing any sign across the board. I’m referring now to consumer in Europe. In Mexico, we feel very comfortable with the portfolio.
In Chile, we also feel very comfortable with the portfolio. So I don’t see any deterioration in the portfolios. And in fact, NPLs are trending down. Remember that the NPLs now around 3%, taking into account that there is a change in criteria within the definition of like-for-like, we are, compared with last year this period, are around 2.80%, at 2.80% something. So — and still trending down, we are not seeing signs of deterioration there.
Well, maybe I should elaborate because I mentioned in the previous quarters around loans. Remember that in the previous quarter, we were discussing uncertainties surrounding ECO loans with extension we did last year for 1 year. Those loans mature, start to pay normal installments in April, May. And I should say that it came, I should say, significantly or much better than expected. So arrears — initial arrears were below 3%. And this is significantly better than at least my expectations, and the uncertainty, why I was showing you this. So that’s the situation. Our models are — have high sensitivity.
As you know, we provide based on IFRS, and the models apply in IFRS rules, 9 rules. I mentioned that provisions in the first half, €600 million, were due to macro conditions to change — to pick in the new macro conditions for the future. And these were mainly in Spain, like €100 million due to market conditions; in U.K. like €200 million, €250 million; and the €130 million. So those are provisions that are there due to change in the macro conditions, not reflecting any kind of deterioration in the portfolio. I think I expect to clarify a little bit the issue of the cost of risk.
Operator
The next question is coming from Pamela Zuluaga from Credit Suisse.
Pamela Zuluaga
The first one is, again, around capital. So most of the organic capital that you keep on generating has been offset by fair valuation adjustments from your bond portfolios. Are you thinking about maybe changing your risk allocation strategy, shifting your accounting towards held to maturity for bonds in order to somehow shield capital better? How should we think about this risk moving forward? Because thinking about the pending regulatory impact that you were guiding for, could we, therefore, expect some further risk to capital if market dynamics continuing on valuations?
And then the second question is on Poland. Do you have any estimates on the potential impact from mortgage moratoria in Poland because we already have confirmation that 4 of those months are going to happen this year and 4 next year? And then should we continue to expect further provisioning in Poland related to the FX-denominated mortgages?
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Okay. Thank you, Pamela, for your questions. In capital organic, your question is related if can collect on the sale. Well, what happens with this portfolio where our portfolios are relatively short duration. So the portfolio is in the region of €50 billion. I think the duration probably you have, you can give the duration of the portfolio. We are not — we took a chance on our capital of 25 basis points in the first half of the year due to the held to collect and sale mark-to-market portfolio. We are not a hurry to change this reclassification.
We know that if we reclassify, you get back 25 basis points. But while at the same time, the duration is short and is going as long as — if the rates remain stable, it’s feeding through the P&L, yes, month after month and quarter after quarter and will get reduced significantly if rates remain as they are today. Naturally, if they go one way or another, well, this affect the P&L, but we are not — we don’t feel that we are not in a hurry given the size of the portfolio and the duration to do something, as you suggest. I don’t know, Jose, if you want to comment something.
Jose Garcia Cantera
Yes, just a bit more detail on this. Of the €75 billion ALCO portfolio, €53 billion is held to collect on sale and only €20 billion, €22 billion, €21.5 billion is held to collect. So we have most of our portfolio in mark-to-market. Of these, as Jose Antonio said, 75% has a duration of less than 2 years.
So for instance, in Poland, it’s 1 year; in Mexico, it’s 1.7 years. So very, very short term duration, 70% less than 2 years. So the impact of this potential — if further deterioration with this duration is going to be significantly less going forward than it has been so far.
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Okay. The second question is in Poland, if I understood you well, you are asking 2 questions. One is about mortgage moratoria and the other one is a FX Swiss franc provision for mortgages. In relation with the first one, what has been published recently and what we’ve done is assuming 50% take up of all the portfolio is going to be an impact of PLN 1.3 billion, yes. So that means in euros, I don’t know, €200 million to €200 million-something, but likely not. Once we have destinations, this is going to be charged in the third quarter in our P&L in Poland. So the figure is slightly below €300 million.
For FX, we are now at 32%, if I am right, coverage. Well, do we need to top up? We’ll see. The market is around 35%. So we are there, is not going to be significant, but maybe that we need to top up depending on how the litigation, how the litigations go, how many customers go to court and how many customers we negotiate directly with them a potential compensation here. But I don’t rule out to go to 36%, 35%, 37%. So — but in any case, it’s 3% of a portfolio of €1.9 billion or something like that. So in euro is like €50 million, €60 million, yes. I hope I answered your questions.
Operator
The next question is coming from Sofie Peterzens from JPMorgan.
Sofie Peterzens
Here is Sofie from JPMorgan. So my first one would be on the proposed Spanish banking tax. Do you have any additional comments that you can make what the potential impact on you will be, and will it only be on your Spanish operations or also on your international operations?
And then my second question would be a little bit a follow-up on the auto portfolio. Could you just remind us how much ALCO bonds you have in Spain, and kind of over time where you need to build up that ALCO portfolio level to. So how much can you potentially increase the ALCO by?
And then just a follow-up question on Mexico. Could you just clarify why you walked away from the Banamex transaction?
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Okay. Spanish banking tax, unfortunately, I have no idea at this moment, at this point of time. So I was told that the rumor in the media is that this morning, the same morning, we’re going to have a kind of presentation because this is a presentation for — in the parliament for the [Indiscernible] – coming from the [Indiscernible]. This is the way they manage this. And we’re going to know this the same morning. If this affects the Spanish operations or global operations, I have no idea. I do expect this to affect the Spanish operations, but we’ll see what happens when this is presented to the parliament today.
ALCO in Spain, we don’t have ALCO in Spain, zero. We don’t have bonds. You are asking me for the level of potential ALCO portfolio. Well, if I look at the — we have a relative duration of 5 years in the balance sheet in Spain. If you were to offset all of this, the portfolio will be very, very large. So you can do the math on your own, but it will be very large.
But since to me is a reasonable ALCO portfolio for Spain is to put the duration of the balance sheet between the minus 2 and plus 2 years, yes, that is normally where we imagine the portfolio is set in extraordinary times when the rates were well into negative territory. We’re going to reconstruct this portfolio little by little, depending on our view on the market and trying to put the balance sheet with a less negative duration. We haven’t started, but we will, for sure, start at some point when we think it’s the appropriate time.
Banamex. Well, as you know, we’ve been very transparent on this. We’re interested in the asset. We put the conditions. One of the conditions was the price, naturally, the price. The return on investment was in condition, not to issue shares. So we told you openly. We submit a nonbinding offer. And well, we were told that we are not going to continue in the process. That’s it.
That there is no more to add, yes? So we were disciplined. And well, as I said before to your colleague, before, we think that we have — we put a price asking for a return on investment attractive for our shareholders, knowing that we have a good chance of gaining market share in the new situation and growing organically and adding several percentage points of market share in Mexico with our existing franchise.
Operator
The next question is coming from Benjie Creelan-Sandford from Jefferies.
Benjie Creelan-Sandford
I had three questions on the revenue outlook, please. First of all, just on the Digital Consumer Bank. I guess looking in the quarter, volumes are going up, but margins are going down. So just wondering if you could discuss a little bit about what you’re seeing in terms of consumer loan demand across the European business, how are clients reacting to cost of living pressures versus what are still very good employment trends. And in terms of margins in the Consumer business, is there a lag effect in terms of asset lead repricing that is weighing on margins? Or are you seeing increasing pricing competition in that segment?
The second question was just a clarification on Brazil and the NII outlook in the second half of the year. So I understood that you expect sort of the rate repricing to sort of level out in the 4Q. So should we assume that NII will be down sequentially in 3Q again? And perhaps if you could just be a bit more precise or offer any more guidance around kind of the rebound as the lag effect and the rate repricing runs off into 2023. I know you gave us guidance on the rate sensitivity on a year 1 basis. Can you give any indication of what that rate sensitivity looks like on a year 2 basis in Brazil?
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Okay. The first question, let me elaborate on Digital Consumer Bank, consumer loan demand in Europe. The consumer loan demand is not bad, I should say, it’s good, yes. So the problem with our portfolio here is basically €120 million, of which 85 — sorry, €120 billion, of which €85 billion or north of €85 billion is related with auto and the remaining is basically direct lending and point of sale. We are seeing good trends in both business, but lead times in the auto industry are getting very, very long.
To give you a proxy of this, normally, we have a stock finance in that we found the inventory of the car dealer is normally in the region of €13 billion to €15 billion. Now this is running at half of this, is €6 billion, €7 billion. This tells you an indication where the industry is in the capacity to deliver the demand they have.
On the other side, I mentioned for the U.S., but the same happens in Europe. The activity in used car markets and the price in used car market is strong. Our origination this year, we’re going to go to the €50 billion mark. This is where our initials are growing 10%, but this is because we are gaining share, okay? It’s not — the market is not there. Car sales are falling, are falling significantly. What happens is we are gaining share all across on for the reason we are growing 10% originations.
The second question, this is the situation of the market. The second question was more margin on pricing. This business, let me do start with the balance sheet of this business. This business is, as I said, close to €120 billion loan book. The majority of this fixed rate normally with a duration of around 2 years, yes. Funded, it’s a combination of deposits in the region of €40 billion, and the rest is wholesale funding, normally issuance and securitizations and other things, while we tend to have relatively very low interest rate risk in this business.
What is happening with the margins? Yields are going up, not at the speed of the — what is happening in the swap year, but this is the usual pattern that this business follow, normally started to go up a couple of months ago, more so in countries in which the rates went up faster before, like the U.K. and the other markets are following. And I don’t see a pattern now differently than the ones — than the one I was expecting, yes. So normally, this business suffer a little bit, not that much because the combination of 40% deposits and 60% wholesale funding the majority of this with 2 — around 2 years duration. We can accommodate the majority of this and not to suffer that much on the margin side.
The fee income is doing well. On the other side, on the back of activity, and if the activity recovers, I do not expect to see significant margin compression. There are the days we cannot pass 100%. In the very first day, we passed — so over a period of 3, 4 months, the new prices to the new origination.
In Brazil, you mentioned outlook in the fourth quarter and rebounding — Brazil, when rebound is going to happen. Jose gave you some indications of this. Basically, what happens in Brazil, as long as rates go up — so let me explain the NII in Brazil. NII in Brazil in the loan book is going up. It went up, has been going up. And the market-related activities collapsed and went into negative territory, remain — the rates went from 2% to 12%.
When this is going to turn around? So normally, when you finish the tightening cycle, it takes around 2 quarters, yes, to go up, okay? So we think that we are close to the peak, but we will see. We think that there’s a couple of basis points still to come from the Central Bank of Brazil, probably 75 basis points, probably 100 basis points, I don’t know, in this region. And 2 quarters afterwards, we’re going to show up this in NII. Yes, Jose mentioned 2023 for the rebound, expecting that with the Central Bank rates, the official rate in Brazil picks in August, September this year, okay? So this is our outlook for Brazil.
Having said that, the customer business, so the loan book, the spread of the loan book is going up, but the financial activities went from positive territory to negative territory this year and is the main swing we have there. This is going to fade away as long as the portfolio mature and renew, all these things, yes. Those are the dynamics in Brazil.
Operator
The next question is coming from Ignacio Cerezo from UBS.
Ignacio Cerezo
I have two questions on the U.S., both around asset quality. So if you can kind of let us know your view about what we need to monitor to gauge when and how quickly asset quality can start deteriorating, if it’s unemployment, like you were mentioning the European consumer finance operation or you’re also concerned around collateral prices going down and reversing the pickup we have seen in the last couple of years?
And the second question around this is I mean, obviously, the units will, a, it has been blended into one. I mean, we don’t have the disclosure between SCUSA and the rest of the bank any longer. There has been significant changes on the mix of SCUSA in recent years as well, so it’s difficult for us actually to have a kind of a realistic view through the cycle cost of risk for the unit. So if you can share your — with us basically the view you have on where can actually cost of risk in the U.S. land in a normal environment?
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Okay. The first question about asset quality, what we are looking when this starts deteriorating, naturally unemployment rate is one of the key drivers also in the U.S. You mentioned what is going on, let me guide you a little bit what’s going on in SCUSA in terms of the dynamics of the business. Now we are seeing significant — we are generating in the loan book with a FICO that is 35 points above what we were generating 1 year ago. So this is — we are generating this. The pricing model is quite sophisticated and goes along with the FICOs we are generating. So this explains a little bit the trends in yields there.
Second, leasing business, now the dynamics are different from any time we have seen before. Normally, leasing businesses works in a way that the customers take the car and 3 years later or 4 years later, they give us back the car and we dispose the car in an auction to the market. And this process in normal times is a process that produce very little profits, very little losses, yes. What has happened on this period is in 2021 — this was a very profitable business in 2020 on the back of very high second half used car market price.
But in 2022, what we are seeing is the customers are not returning back the cars to us. They prefer to sell in their own, given the high prices prevailing in the used car markets. And this changed the dynamics in the P&L. Is not the reason you see — that I think is in the other income, you see a significant decrease in the other income due to this phenomenon. Last year, we made, out of this €200 million, yet we are making very little out of this process.
Asset quality, we expect we — traditionally, we were around 4%, 4 something percent in SCUSA. In the cost of risk, less than 5%. And now the cost of risk in U.S., the whole U.S. is 1.5%. So what the bank is you split between the bank, the bank is very low cost of risk, I mean less. And all the cost of risk you are seeing now, the 1.5% comes from SCUSA, okay?
This normalization will happen over time and depends not necessarily bad in the past. As we are generating higher FICOs, we also expect lower cost of risk when the unemployment deteriorate. I think unemployment continues to be the main driver, not as much interim rates. Remember that we are lending a very high yield, and the impact of additional 100 basis points or 50 basis points or 200 basis points in the yield is not meaningful when you are lending at 20% or something like that. So you go to 21%, it’s not as important as it is in the prime space where the changes in rates can produce more significant changes in the monthly installments. I think I answered your questions, yes?
Operator
The next question is coming from Carlos Peixoto from CaixaBank.
Carlos Peixoto
So a couple of questions from my side as well. I was just wondering, well, the first one is really just a follow-up. I believe I missed exactly the guidance that you have given for NII in Brazil in the — for the full year.
And the second question, I was wondering on the outlook for cost of risk in Spain. I believe that in the past, you have mentioned something in the area of 50 basis points. Right now, cost of risk is still trending a bit above those levels. I was wondering how you see it for the second half of the year and possibly [2022].
Jose Antonio Alvarez
So in Brazil, you have — so it’s single digit — mid-single-digit growth in Brazil is what you should expect for NII in Brazil for the whole year, yes.
While the cost of risk in Spain hasn’t changed our expectations, we set 50 basis points to 60 basis points for the whole year, probably this is what you should expect for Spain this year.
Well, naturally, this means, as you know, the cost of risk now largely depends on the macro synergies, yes. And well, I told you that €600 million in the first half came from the macro. Well, the second half, the macro is so uncertain in these days that, well, we will see what kind of macro we introduce at the end of the year. But if the macro remains as it is today, let’s take IMF expectations that they published yesterday, the day before yesterday, it should stay in this levels, yes. So as I said to you before, we do not expect a big deal this year on the ground coming from the cost of risk.
Operator
The next question is coming from Andrea Filtri from Mediobanca.
Andrea Filtri
Two questions. One on rate sensitivity. This is the flavor of the moment, but the visibility you’re giving is still quite low compared to other names. Can you please give us for each main area your 12 months rate sensitivity, assuming 0 deposits beta, I think, you plugged in the forward curve that we can all see just to add some transparency on that front. And I didn’t understand quite well before, Jose Antonio, your elaboration around the reason not to have any Spanish bonds ALCO portfolio in Spain and how big the ALCO should be in a normalized scenario.
The second question is on Brazil. Again, on the rate sensitivity. You elaborated quite a lot around this, but I wanted to understand in Brazilian reals term, what you would expect then to be the tailwind on a full phasing when the liability repricing stops and the asset repricing at the current rate level is completed, to understand that the swing depended on from the negative headwind to the positive tailwind. And hence, how much can this pay in terms of cost of risk.
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Okay. Let me elaborate. Jose will guide you through the specific details on the numbers you see. Rates — sensitivity to rates. So we’re going to give you and is in the presentation the parallel shift from the yield curve. But you asked for areas. High level, I should say that with the forward, normally what happens is this is a process that is accelerating. So if I take the whole 2023 with the forward rates, probably in Europe, we should think in all our business in Europe, €2 billion, north of €2 billion, probably. This is a figure that, well, you know there is plenty of numbers there, but this is a figure that sounds reasonable to me.
You asked for the Spanish ALCO, well, I may in terms of ratio, having an ALCO between €20 billion and €40 billion is something that sounds to me reasonable. ALCO does not necessarily mean one single sovereign, means a portfolio of fixed rate assets that we do not generate in commercial terms.
In commercial terms, as you know, while the majority of our 80% of the mortgage book, the majority of the lending to SMEs and corporates and 100% of the lending to CIB or almost 100% of the lending to CIB is floating rate. So on the other way around, is a limited asset that we generate a fixed rate. And for that reason, the need of having a significant ALCO portfolio.
In Spain, we don’t have, because our view about interest rates was that they should go up. And that’s the reason why we don’t have this portfolio. Jose, you want to clarify any specific data?
Jose Garcia Cantera
Yes. The reason we give a parallel shift — well, parallel shift really it is from 1 day to 12 months. The sensitivity we have doesn’t go beyond 12 months, obviously. So when we talk about a parallel shift, we are talking about a movement between overnight and 12 months.
And the reason we gave a parallel shift is because today, for instance, the market is expecting rates in Europe to stay at 1%. While just a month ago, it was much higher than that. So it’s much better to look at sensitivity. And then for a parallel shift, which is again a movement between a day and 12 months, and then you put your own outlook of rates. But for a parallel shift of 100 basis points on a 25% beta, the sensitivity in Spain is €750 million, in the U.K. is €300 million, most of which we have already seen, by the way.
So in the U.K., we would expect further sensitivity in the second half of this year and then probably some stabilization in 2023. €140 million in the U.S. For the second year, this is relevant for Brazil. And in Brazil, in the second year, we would expect a positive sensitivity of around €150 million. So if we are right and then the last interest rate hike takes place in August, September, and then we start seeing the positive sensitivity flowing through the P&L in Brazil towards the end of this year, beginning of next year, then we should see this sensitivity in the P&L in Brazil, which is around €140 million, €150 million. This sensitivity to a parallel shift is in the presentation.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] The next question is coming from Carlos Cobo Catena from Societe Generale.
Carlos Cobo Catena
A couple of questions for me. One is on M&A appetite now that you’ve ruled out Mexico, there’s been some reports in the media about you exploring some agreements or expanding the agreements with car makers in Europe. You’ve always been very interested in your European Consumer Finance business. So could that be an area where you could do some bolt-on deals? And how material, if you could quantify that they might be in terms of capital consumption, if it’s possible to give some view.
Then I understand there is been some top up in the macro provision’s overlay. Can you elaborate on which countries you’ve been — in which countries you’ve allocated that provision because of you’ve seen how the Spanish peers aren’t really topping up that COVID overlay. So it will be interesting to see what — if you defer from them? And that’s it, that’s my 2 questions.
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Thank you, Carlos. Well, M&A appetite, well, we are not looking — what you mentioned is agreement with OEMS. Well, we look at this as almost as a BAU. If I look backwards, in the last year we signed 3 important deals. The main one was Stellantis, that was a restructuring of the previous deal that will bring to us our portfolio, as a result of this, will grow in the region of €5 billion with the agreement with Stellantis.
We reached another important agreement with Mitsubishi to be the provider in the U.S., and we’ve done another agreement, very important this one, with Honda in Mexico to be the provider for Honda in Mexico. Naturally, we have plenty of discussions in some cases for one country, in some cases for the whole Europe. And probably we have several of those open, but nothing that I can communicate at this stage because — but I see this as a BAU for the division of Digital Consumer Finance.
Reaching agreements with the OEMs means, in some cases, that we establish a joint venture with them in which we match the financial side and they match the commercial side of the joint venture or having white label, providing white label to them and provide our services there. We agree, and this — I forgot to mention that we also reached an agreement in Greece last year with a main importer in Greece for — that has 30% market share, but this is, as I should say, business as usual and is in our projections that we gave for the business as usual in the Digital Consumer Bank space.
The provisions overlay, I said before, well, this €100 million is roughly speaking numbers, €100 million in Spain, €260 million in U.K. and 130 million in U.S. So those are the [€600 million] that you have embedded due to macro in the first half results.
Operator
The last question is coming from Britta Schmidt from Autonomous Research.
Britta Schmidt
I’ve got 2 questions, please. One is on the rate outlook for Brazil. The consensus expects that there will be rate cuts in 2023. And maybe you can help us walk through the dynamics of your NII outlook then. Would we see even wider spreads, at say, in the second half of 2023, depending, of course, on the timing?
And my second question will be on Poland. Do you have any update on the WIBOR issues there. Do you expect this still to become a legal case and drag on? What’s the latest from the ground?
Jose Antonio Alvarez
In the retail look for Brazil, we expect the rates to pick rather sooner than later, maybe in August, maybe in September this year. And well, when those — the rates start to go down, more difficult to say. But as you know, in the very short run, the CFO already elaborated on this. Normally, you should expect 1, 2 quarters negative or positive. And afterwards, the commercial dynamics prevail, yes? But overall, those are the dynamics and what you should expect from NII. And this is the outlook for rates in Brazil, well, still highly uncertain next year, yes.
Poland, you’re asking me if it’s a legal case, it’s too early to tell. While we, naturally, we’re as of today, we are analyzing the situation, I provide you the impact. Assuming a 50% take-up on the mortgage moratoria, this is a significant damage for the system as a whole. And while our colleagues, the financial system in Poland, we’ll take a view on this, well, this is not an individual case. This is a whole financial community in Poland that should take the appropriate view on this when we finish to analyze the proposal from the government.
Jose Garcia Cantera
If I may add in terms of the WIBOR, we just know that there is a proposal to change it, but we don’t have the details. It would start next year, but there are no details at all with regards to the change in the way. It will be very difficult to change the index. I don’t know if you want to elaborate. But it would go against recommendations for index regulation in Europe. So it would be very difficult to change. But we have no news.
Jose Antonio Alvarez
The proposal is difficult to execute. As Jose said this, European regulations prevent to go this way. And that’s the situation. We do not expect any news soon, yes, on this? No. Okay?
Begona Morenes
Jose Antonio, there are no further questions.
Jose Antonio Alvarez
Thank you guys, and take care. And have a good holidays, those who take holidays in the next couple of weeks. Thank you. Bye.
Jose Garcia Cantera
Thank you, everybody. Bye.
Be the first to comment