The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) CEO Damian Kozlowski on Q2 2022 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

The Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:TBBK) Q2 2022 Results Conference Call July 29, 2022 8:00 AM ET

Company Participants

Andres Viroslav – Director of IR

Damian Kozlowski – President & CEO

Paul Frenkiel – EVP of Strategy, Secretary, CFO & Principal Accounting Officer

Conference Call Participants

Frank Schiraldi – Piper Sandler

Michael Perito – KBW

Operator

Welcome to the Q2 2022 Bancorp, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Vanessa and I will your operator for today’s call. [Operator Instructions]

I will now turn the call over to Andres Viroslav.

Andres Viroslav

Thank you, Vanessa. Good morning and thank you for joining us today for The Bancorp’s second quarter 2022 financial results conference call. On the call with me today are Damian Kozlowski, Chief Executive Officer; and Paul Frenkiel, our Chief Financial Officer. This morning’s call is being webcast on our website at www.thebancorp.com. There will be a replay of the call available via webcast on our website beginning at approximately 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time today.

Before I turn the call over to Damian, I would like to remind everyone that when used in this conference call, the words believes, anticipates, expects and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those anticipated or suggested by such statements. For further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please see The Bancorp’s filings with the SEC.

Listeners are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date hereof. The Bancorp undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Now, I’d like to turn the call over to The Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer, Damian Kozlowski. Damian?

Damian Kozlowski

Thank you, Andres. Good morning, everyone. The Bancorp generated $0.53 a share earnings from 3% revenue growth and 2% year-over-year reduction expense. Gross dollar volume GDV showed continued improvement with year-over-year growth of 5%. We expect this trend to continue in the coming quarters. Loan growth continues to be strong. All businesses grew balances quarter-over-quarter led by real estate bridge lending with 38% growth and institutional which includes S block, I block and RIA financing with 10% quarter-over-quarter growth. Both businesses grew significantly year-over-year with commercial real estate growing to 1.1 billion since its third quarter 2021 resumption and institutional growing 35%.

Total loans of the Bancorp excluding loans at fair value grew 14% quarter-over-quarter and 61% year-over-year excluding previously discontinued assets. Expenses decreased 2% year-over-year as we continue to manage expenses rigorously with the focus on scalability and platform productivity. Current economic conditions and the rise of interest rates should have a positive impact and earnings growth over the next two years. The Bancorp asset sensitive due to its approximately 70% variable loan book and very stable deposit funding through its payments ecosystem that is spread over more than 50 payment program partners.

We expect deposits to reprise to approximately 42% of Fed Funds increases when rates are raised by the Federal Reserve. Low rates re-priced with a slight lag, with significant amounts of re-pricing the following month. This lag was experienced in June, as funding costs increased with a delayed increase in loan rates.

However, starting in June, previous rate increases will begin to directly impact loan interest income and net interest margin. We believe our loan book and securities portfolio is lower risk and an asset classes that have taken the losses throughout economic cycles, significant amounts of liquid or cash collateral, back both our S block and I block loans. SBA loans have partial to 75% guarantees or 50% to 60% loan to values. Car fleet leases have the credit worthiness of our borrowers, many of which are government institutional entities with an established history of minimizing losses through appropriate residual values on vehicle collateral, and our floating rate transitional multifamily loans are supported by new money from sponsors and rising rents that we believe offset the impact of interest rate increases.

Most of these loans are in states that have had high occupancy rates and economic growth with increasing populations. In addition, we have generally held purchasing government bonds and other fixed rate securities during the low interest rate environment experienced over the last two and a half years. So we have substantial capacity to add that fixed rate exposures as interest rates rise.

Lastly, the Bancorp is also somewhat insulated from inflation, as our GDP base fees are contractually based on the total value of transactions. This helps support the growth even in a recessionary environment where the total amount of goods sold, stagnates or declines but prices continue to rise with a strong business pipeline and rising rates. We’re raising our guidance for 2022 from 2.15 a share to the range of 2.25 to 2.30 per share. This range excludes the impact of 2022 share repurchases, but includes interest rate assumptions based on Fed Funds expectations. We expect to issue guidance for 2023 in our third quarter 2022 earnings release.

I will now turn over a call to Paul Frenkiel to give more details on the second quarter.

Paul Frenkiel

Thank you, Damian. Return on assets and equity for Q2, 2022 were respectively 1.7% and 19% compared to 1.7% and 19% in Q2, 2021. Q2 pre-tax income increased $4 million or 11% to $41 million in the second quarter compared to $37 million in Q2, 2021.

Additionally, the prior quarter included $4.3 million of PPP related interest in fees substantially all of which was eliminated in the current year quarter. Also reflecting the $4.3 million PPP reduction with $55 million of Q2, 2022 net interest income which as a result was comparable to the prior year quarter. Additionally, in Q2, 2022, funding costs contractually adjusted immediately to Federal Reserve rate hikes, and increased to 44 basis points from 18 basis points during Q2, 2021.

Immediate funding expense increases and the lag loan rate adjustments noted earlier were reflected in a decrease in our net interest margin to 3.17% for Q2, 2022 from 3.19% in Q2, 2021. While loan rates lag, they adjust more fully to rate changes. So as loans re-price, we expect that increases in loan yields in Q3, and Q4 will exceed the increase in funding costs and begin to positively impact margins and net interest income. The provision for credit losses was a credit of $1.5 million in Q2, 2022, compared to a credit of 951,000 in Q2, 2021.

The credit in the current year reflected the impact of low reserves on credit deteriorated loans, and a greater proportion of government guaranteed loans on our CECL loan pools. Those factors were partially offset by the impact of loan growth. The credit in 2021 reflected the reversal of pandemic related provisions. Prepaid debit and other payment related accounts are our largest funding source and the primary driver of non-interest income.

Total fees and related payments income of 22.4 million in Q2, 2022 increased 5% compared to Q2, 2021. Non-interest expense for Q2, 2022 was $43 million reflecting a decrease of 2% from Q2, 2021 notwithstanding $1.2 million settlement related to the cascade matter in 2022.

The decrease reflected lower FDIC expense resulting from the reclassification of certain deposits from broker to non-brokered and lowered incentive compensation related expense. Book value per share quarter end increased 7% to 11.55 compared to 10.77 a year earlier, reflecting retained earnings, partially offset by fair value adjustments to the investment portfolio, resulting from the higher rate environment. Quarterly share repurchases have continued to reduce shares outstanding.

I will now turn the call back to Damian.

Damian Kozlowski

Thanks, Paul. Operator, could you please open up the lines for questions?

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

We will now begin our question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] And we have our first question from Frank Schiraldi with Piper Sandler.

Frank Schiraldi

Just wondering on, Damian you talked about the obviously the GDP growth year-over-year is really strong and given a really strong 2021. I know there’s some headwinds to year-over-year growth in the first half of this year, that will dissipate a bit in the back half. So just wondering if you can update us on your thoughts on year-over-year GDP growth in the back half of this year.

Damian Kozlowski

Yes, so it’s accelerating, it looks like and that’s because of we expected the burn off kind of the stimulus, but it kind of gapped up and never gapped down again. So it’s returning the trend. We’re over the loss of the borrow, a program and the bump in stimulus. So now it’s going to be much smoother. We’re adding new programs. So the volume is so much larger than it was a couple of years ago. So you’re going to get high single, lower double digit growth. And we should nicely move into that as we go through the year and then the beginning of next year. We can’t always predict this, depending on what’s happening with the economy. But it looks like we’re returning to more of the double digit trend.

Frank Schiraldi

And are there any concerns in terms of the pipeline talk of Neobank competition and higher cost of capital may be shaking some of those institutions out? What are your thoughts there in general?

Damian Kozlowski

We haven’t seen it. We have a incredibly strong pipeline, adding new products and new programs, we’re dealing with a much more mature well funded programs. And we’re not only in the FinTech space, we’re across many verticals, corporate incentive, state cards, healthcare, all those things are doing well. So we haven’t seen any deterioration in the more mature programs wanting to have a more complex platform in order to do business. So we’re in good shape right now. We haven’t seen any deterioration.

Frank Schiraldi

And then, on the balance sheet, just wondering, just thinking about growth from here. Can you continue to grow GDV at a greater pace than growing deposit balances? Just how are you managing balance sheet growth from here? And where do you expect to be in terms of footings by the year say?

Damian Kozlowski

Well, we continue to be looked at, we had extraordinary loan growth over the year-over-year if you take out the discontinued and you took out the securities portfolio, and that was replacing assets that were running off. And we had, if you look at the quarter-over-quarter, annualized, we’re in the 30% range. So that’s going to obviously slow down because we’re replacing a lot of the loans. But you’ll see that continued. We’re targeting 15, overall portfolio 15% or 20% portfolio growth until we max out the balance sheet. And we’ve got some really great opportunities in the S block area, we had very strong growth, and increasing spreads in the real estate portfolio that should come down a bit. So we were targeting that 15% to 20% growth going into the end of the year, and hopefully in that range in 2023.

Frank Schiraldi

And in terms of like just thinking about deposit balances, we should generally just think about sort of matching that growth to GDV growth, does that make the most sense?

Damian Kozlowski

Yes, we’re very liquid. We have a lot of ways to increase our deposit base. We might have to do some short term, we never know going into third and fourth quarter, and then the first quarter of 2023 because of the seasonality, taxes, gift cards, those type of things. So we usually leave it fairly open during those two quarters to see where we’re going to be at the end of the first quarter. So we’ll know how to put in more permanent funding if necessary.

We did see from the stimulus, a big increase in deposits, once again, we thought that would burn off that has not burned off. And it’s been replaced by other programs and growth in our current programs. So we expect the funding to mostly come as we, as it has in the past continued growth in the 50 or more programs that we have. We don’t expect to radically change our funding structure, so mostly will be based on the payments.

There may be opportunities grow a little bit more aggressively. And then we’ll either have to borrow short term or put in some more longer term deposits at Fed Funds plus, but that’s not something we can predict. And that’s only a result of faster than what we expect growth.

Frank Schiraldi

And then just finally, in terms of interest rate hikes, just want to make sure I understand the math. So 70% of the loan book is variable rate. And now that you threw the floors on the [Indiscernible] for sale, I guess that’s variable rate as well. So that’s within the 70% when you talk about the loan betas.

Damian Kozlowski

So what’s happened is, you got two things going on in the second quarter. You had some interest rate increases, and immediately we take the funding costs part of it. So it goes up, our funding costs goes up, but we have a lag. We had floors, which were through number one. We also had a lag in the loan pricing. So it goes from the next month things like S block will re-price based on prime the next month, right. So if it was at the end of the month, you’ll get it in the beginning of.

So for the recent 75 increase things I guess S block will re-price in the beginning of August. There are other things like the CRE portfolio that are based on sulphur. Sulphur is an average, that’s kind of backward looking about 60 days. So that impact of the last interest rate increase in June is really only going to be felt in August or excuse me in July. So you have this immediate funding impact, a lag and pricing, in fact, FBA, some of the FBA loans re-priced quarterly. So as we go through the year and approach 2023, you’re going to have this revenue as the loan, the different schedule on loan re-pricing happens throughout the next six months.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is from Michael Perito with KBW.

Michael Perito

Hey, guys, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I’d like to just follow up on that last line of questioning. I mean, are you guys kind of willing to give any like range or indication of where you think the NIM might be able to settle in the back half of the year based on the updated guide? I mean, are we talking something like north of 3.5%, by the end of the year, or you guys thinking about that.

Damian Kozlowski

So it will go up. Now that went through the floors, it should go up about 60, excuse me 58% of whatever the increase is, right. So of course our portfolio so it’s you can make the calculation now that we’re through the floors, like for this recent one, we’ll get 58% of that 75 basis points that just happened a day or two ago, that will lead into the NIM based on the fact that and then you have to obviously realize that 70% is variable. So you get this and it’s lagged, so it will obviously increase. If we continue with the Fed Funds past neutral, and they’re talking it changes, maybe a 350 Fed rate by the end of the year could be less could be more, that’s obviously going to have a big impact on NIM.

It’ll go through the mid to the high threes. And what we do our modeling and you looked at the Fed Funds future. This is of course, very variable, it could range depending on the assets that we hold and all the other calculations you need to do. But it’ll be, it’ll go from if you continue with these interest rates increases, it’ll go from the low threes to the high threes. And potentially next year, if you continue with this process, and un-normalized more tightening through the 2.5% range to 3.5% to 4% Fed Funds rate you get close to 4% or around 4%.

Michael Perito

Just a few more for me just on the card fees themselves. The sequential delink quarter growth rate was I think a little ahead of GDV. Just wondering if there’s anything in there that could kind of revert or normalize moving forward and that we should think about as we kind of forecast the back half of the year.

Damian Kozlowski

No. We’re more normal. Now remember, we had a period where general purpose reloadable was really declining and debit was taking over. And general purpose reloadable is generally higher spread, higher fee basis points than debit. So you had that going on. And we had the peers for the big programs and they’re all through their peers. So you’re going to get a better match of GDV and fee growth than you would have had a year and a half ago when you had massive growth and debit first general purpose reloadable especially energized by the stimulus payments. So a lot of that went through debit didn’t go through general purpose reloadable. And so you saw disproportion GDV growth but not the same fee growth.

Michael Perito

And then on the just the expense run rate, it took a step up sequentially here, just wondering if you guys could talk through that increase and maybe provide some context of expectations for the back half of the year.

Damian Kozlowski

Well, that’s Paul’s favorite subject. So I’ll give that to Paul.

Paul Frenkiel

Sure. So we had, if you look link quarter, we did have an increase in salary expense. And that was driven by incentive compensation. There is some variability. You have to pick up that expense when those decisions and the production implies that you’re going to have that expense. So I think using this quarter as a run rate is probably what we should be doing and you will see some inflationary increases. I think we’re very automated. And we’ve got a lot of scalability.

We’ve made significant investments in that so we’re not looking at that as an extreme increase. So I think you’ll have modest increases from here on in.

Michael Perito

And last, do if you expect the tax rate for the remainder of the year to be more like, similar to the first quarter or at the higher rate of the second quarter?

Paul Frenkiel

It’ll be of the higher rate in the 20s. It should be in the 26% range. That’s what we’re using for our internal planning.

Operator

And thank you. We have no further questions. I will now turn the call over to Damian Kozlowski for closing remarks.

Damian Kozlowski

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. Appreciate your interest, and we’ll talk soon. Operator, you can disconnect the call.

Operator

Thank you. And thank you ladies and gentlemen. This concludes our conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*