Pilgrim’s Pride, Tyson Foods settle some chicken price-fixing litigation By Reuters

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) – Pilgrim’s Pride (NASDAQ:) Corp and Tyson Foods Inc (NYSE:) said on Monday they have settled price-fixing litigation by a group of poultry buyers that accused them of violating U.S. antitrust law by conspiring to inflate chicken prices.

Pilgrim’s Pride, owned mainly by Brazil’s JBS SA (OTC:), will pay $75 million to settle claims by purchasers that bought chickens directly from the company. The size of Tyson’s settlement with the same purchasers was not disclosed.

Neither company admitted liability, and both said settling was in their best interests.

Both settlements require approval by a federal judge in Chicago.

Neither affects claims by “indirect” purchasers, which include restaurant and supermarket operators such as Chick-fil-A, Kroger (NYSE:) Co and Target (NYSE:) Inc as well as ordinary consumers.

They also do not affect claims against other defendants, such as Sanderson Farms (NASDAQ:) Inc and Perdue Farms Inc.

Pilgrim’s settlement is the largest in more than four years of litigation by restaurants, supermarkets and food distributors over alleged price-fixing in the $65 billion chicken industry https://www.nationalchickencouncil.org/about-the-industry/statistics/broiler-chicken-industry-key-facts.

A few smaller chicken producers previously reached similar settlements totaling $13 million.

Similar litigation has been pending in Minneapolis federal court accusing Tyson, another JBS unit and other pork producers of conspiring to inflate pork prices by limiting supply.

The Pilgrim’s settlement follows that company’s agreement in October to pay a $110.5 million fine to resolve a U.S. Department of Justice criminal price-fixing probe.

Last year, the Justice Department also filed criminal price-fixing and bid-rigging charges https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/six-additional-individuals-indicted-antitrust-charges-ongoing-broiler-chicken-investigation in Denver against 10 poultry industry executives. All have pleaded not guilty.

The case is In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 16-08637.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*