Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (CNSL) Q3 2022 Earnings Call Transcript

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CNSL) Q3 2022 Results Conference Call November 1, 2022 8:30 AM ET

Company Participants

Jennifer Spaude – Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications

Bob Udell – President and CEO

Steve Childers – Chief Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Greg Williams – Cowen

Michael Rollins – Citi

Jason Kim – Goldman Sachs

Stephen Sikora – Aetna

Ana Goshko – Bank of America

Operator

Good morning. My name is Dennis, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Consolidated Communications Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you.

I will now turn the call over to Jennifer Spaude, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Jennifer, you may begin your conference.

Jennifer Spaude

Good morning, and thank you for joining the Consolidated Communications third quarter 2022 earnings call. Our earnings release, financial statements and presentation are all posted on the Investor Relations section of our website at ir.consolidated.com. Please review the Safe Harbor provisions on slide two of the presentation.

Today’s discussion includes forward-looking statements about expected future events and financial results that involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed today. A discussion of factors that may affect future results is contained in Consolidated’s filings with the SEC. In addition, during the call today, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, which are defined and reconciled in our earnings presentation and press release.

With me today on the call are Bob Udell, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Steve Childers, our Chief Financial Officer. Following their prepared remarks, we will open the call up for questions.

I’d now like to turn the call over to Bob Udell.

Bob Udell

Thank you, Jennifer, and good morning, everyone. During the third quarter we continued making significant progress on our transformation to becoming a fiber first broadband company. We now have approximately 950,000 fiber passings across our service area, up from roughly 500,000 a year ago. We added 12,100 fiber subscribers and grew our fiber customer base to 116,000, up 42% versus the prior year. Importantly, we’re seeing very strong adoption of our Fidium fiber 1-gig product.

Before I go into more detail about the third quarter, let me spend some time outlining the strong fiber market dynamics highlighted on slide four. Hybrid broadband is a resilient and scalable product with decades’ worth of runway. It offers faster symmetrical speeds with the lowest latency. Fiber broadband also ranks very high for customer satisfaction when compared to alternative offerings. We see frequent proof points on data consumption growth, which we expect will continue. For example, the growth in the average number of connected devices in American Homes is expected to rise by 60% between 2020 and 2025. However, the top streaming viewing hours on connected devices increased by 59% over the past few years. Plus, we all know about the growth in video conferencing and its importance to our everyday work lives since COVID. And given the critical importance of being connected, we expect that fiber broadband will be resilient during challenging economic times.

Fiber is a future proof technology considering fiber networks are upgradeable, scalable and able to deliver much higher broadband speeds in the future. Our fiber to the home network is 10-gig today, scalable to 50-gig in the near future, while our core network is built for 100-gig and upgradeable to 400-gig with available technology. The fiber upgrades that we are making today provide us with years of long term free cash flow upon the completion of the build and subsequent return to more normalized capital expenditures.

Finally, we are keen where the fiber oriented companies have historically exhibited strong value multiples. But simply, we believe that the transformation of consolidated from a copper telco to a pure play fiber company garner significant shareholder value for our stakeholders as we execute on our plan and deliver growth.

On slide five, you’ll see why we are confident. Consolidated will win with fiber. First, our incumbent position provides us with distinct structural advantages as we execute on the fiber build plan. We have existing conduit capacity for buried facilities and pole access where we have aerial plant. In Northern New England, approximately 80% of our network is aerial and it is in close proximity to our existing fiber backbone facilities. And as a reminder, New England represents 70% of our build plan.

Second, we operate in a favorable competitive footprint. In fact, 90% of the markets that we serve have just one or less wireline cable competitor. Also the fixed wireless competition in our market is limited due to the terrain in certain regions. Our Fidium fiber product is providing our communities with a superior technology that isn’t available from other service providers who are generally focused on more populated cities. We are proud of our mission and we are playing a big role in bridging the digital divide across the communities we serve.

Third, we’re already seeing validation for our product in the market that we’ve entered. This is evidenced through our industry leading Net Promoter Scores greater than 50. This is well above the competition, and our one year cumulative 2021 cohort penetration is exceeding our target. Fourth, we’re well positioned for broadband stimulus at the federal and state levels through public-private partnership opportunities, particularly with our symmetrical fiber product offering. We’ll cover this in greater detail when we discuss the build plan.

Turning to third quarter results. Record consumer fiber adds contributed to a second consecutive quarter of net positive broadband connections, offsetting DSL declines. Our strong build pace through September has us on track to complete 400,000 fiber location upgrades during 2022. Notably, we are on track to have nearly 1 million fiber addressable locations by year end, bringing our mix of fiber passings to 37%, up nearly fourfold since 2020.

To simplify our business and support the transition to a fiber broadband company, we announced over $600 million in aggregates divestitures over the past year. These important milestones not only mark continued progress in our transformation to becoming a fiber first broadband company, but also position us for return to long term revenue and EBITDA growth.

Now let’s turn to slide eight, where I’ll update you on our fiber build plan. In the third quarter, we upgraded 116,000 locations bringing our total fiber passings to 948,000 locations or 34% of our overall service area. Looking forward to the next three years, we plan to build fiber to an additional 1 million locations, which will transform the company to more than 70% fiber passings by 2025. To put this into perspective, this will be a seven times increase from 2020. We are tracking roughly $170 million in broadband government partnership opportunities throughout our service area.

We’re actively pursuing all grant or infrastructure funding opportunities that align with our build plans and to help to offset rural high cost passings, allowing a return consistent with our model. We are confident in our plan to achieve approximately 2 million fiber locations as we exit 2025. We’ve proven that we can ramp the built quickly as we’ve averaged just over 110,000 upgrades per quarter over the past year. Our cumulative 2021 cohort fiber penetration at the 12 month mark is 15.9%, which is above our target of 14%. We achieved this largely through penetration of the single family home or SFU channel on passings that are ready for sale.

The remaining population of fiber passing is consisting of large multi-dwelling units or MDUs and multi-tenant units or MTUs and it is approximately 15% to 18% of our total fiber passings. As a reminder, our cohort penetration target for year two is 24% and year three is 33%. Total penetration will be closer to the 40% range over a five year horizon we have duopoly parity. The MDU in the small business channels provide upside for us as we launch Fidium network and deploy MDU team during the 2023 year to further penetrate these customer groups. Our pre-2021 existing fiber base penetrations have improved 160 basis points since the end of 2020, which while positive, we feel there’s additional opportunity to grow as our Fidium fiber brand grows and gains momentum.

Let’s turn to slide 10, where I will provide some commentary on the fiber growth that we’ve experienced and our ARPU opportunity, which are catalyst for a return to overall revenue and EBITDA growth in the future. In the recent quarter, we added a record 12,100 Fidium fiber subscribers, a 3 times increase from a year ago and a 26% sequential increase from our second quarter adds. We also achieved total consumer positive broadband adds for the quarter. Importantly, fiber customer gains outpaced DSL losses for the second consecutive quarter. Over 70% are choosing our 1-gig service and the vast majority are new subscribers.

Our shift to fiber from copper continues to trend well as fiber now makes up 30% of our consumer broadband connections, which is up from 21% a year ago. Adding to this, fiber ARPU exceeds copper ARPU by nearly $12 dollars, providing us with ample upside. Our game plan which has been the favorite choice amongst new subscribers starts at $70 per month and moves up to $95 per month on a one year anniversary. Additionally, I’ll add that there are long term cost efficiencies associated with our transformation to fiber as we benefit from process automation initiatives and derive savings from the more resilient characteristics fiber has on operations and maintenance. For example, over 50% of the orders for Fidium fiber are coming from the web. This is up considerably from a year ago.

Now let’s turn to our commercial and data — and carrier channels. In the third quarter, we saw a nominal decline in commercial data services revenue, driven by a large customer churn. We are also experiencing some commercial price compression. However, we believe the decline in commercial data services revenue is temporary and we believe we have opportunities to continue growing data services.

In fact, within commercial, we grew our strategic revenues in areas of SD-WAN, Cloud Secure and ProConnect by over 13% in third quarter year over year. We’re excited to launch Fidium network in January, offering a simple, highly competitive fiber broadband service to small businesses and an awesome app for easy management. Fidium network will leverage a digital online sales channel and offer plans including 2-gig over our [indiscernible] network targeting the small business customer at a highly competitive price.

Carrier data and transport revenue increased 1%, driven by a delay in tower negotiations combined with capacity upgrades in the fiber to the tower business, which have largely offset the expected market rate adjustments. New fiber passings within our unique routes provide opportunities for us to leverage the same fiber to grow both carrier and commercial data transport services. We increased our lit buildings by 7.5% in the third quarter which correlates to higher margins, increased opportunity to upsell and a greater ability to ensure the best customer experience.

I’d like to also highlight our commitment to sustainability and our ESG priorities. As a leading fiber broadband provider, our role within our communities has never been more important. Our community values inspire us to be good neighbors and to deliver the most reliable services through a great customer experience and to connect people in all that we do. Our work with all areas of ESG continues and guides us as we conduct business and help our communities to thrive.

I will now turn the call over to Steve, who will provide more insight on our third quarter financial results. Steve?

Steve Childers

Thanks, Bob, and good morning to everyone. Let me start with the major event in the quarter, which was the September 13 closing on the sale of our five wireless limited partnerships interest to Verizon. The sale generated $490 million in gross cash proceeds, which will be used to support our fiber broadband expansion and growth plan. We expect that the federal taxable gain will be fully shield by our net operating losses and we also estimate incremental state cash taxes will be between $10 million to $13 million.

The wireless cash distributions from these investments are paid one quarter in arrears. We received $5.5 million in the third quarter, which was lower than what we had expected, lower than historical run rate. The primary reason for the lower than expected distributions was that, Verizon significantly accelerated their capital spend on 5G overbuild tax of the C band frequency in a couple of our partnerships in the second quarter. We currently estimate that our Q4 distributions will be approximately $4 million to $6 million, our distributions will be based on Verizon’s Q3 performance and our prorated share based on the time of ownership in the quarter. We estimate our full year 2022 wireless cash distributions to be between $30 million and $32 million. There will be no distributions in ‘23.

I’ll now provide an overview of our third quarter results. Total operating revenue for the third quarter was $296.6 million and adjusted EBITDA was $97.2 million, representing a 32.8% adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter. As we consider this level of EBITDA margin, it is important to note that we are making significant investments in our operating expenses to support our fiber transformation and growth plan. We are encouraged by the early results from this investment in the business as evidenced by our consumer fiber revenue growth and strong take rate for our fiber products offering, as indicated by strong net fiber adds.

Looking over the long term, upon the execution of our growth plan and return to revenue growth, we believe we will see significant margin expansion and our EBITDA margin is kind of upside to the mid to high 40% levels. As a reminder, effective January 1 of this year our annual $48 million in CAF II funding transition to an annual $6 million under the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund. The subsidy reduction impacts our 2022 quarterly revenue and EBITDA by approximately $10.5 million.

In addition to the subsidy reset, adjusted EBITDA in the quarter was impacted by the following items on a year over year basis. $5.6 million lower wireless cash distributions as previously discussed, approximately $7.8 million higher voice erosion across all customer channels, approximately $3 million for inflationary impacts from energy and fuel costs and $2.5 million for normalization of New Hampshire property tax rebates which we received last year.

Committed capital expenditures totaled $139.9 million in the third quarter and our $476.8 million year to date. As Bob mentioned, we are making excellent progress in our fiber build plan and are on pace to meet our upgrade target of 400,000 fiber passings in 2022. As we have discussed, we have significant cost to build advantages, especially in our Northern New England markets where 70% of our 1.6 million upgrades are targeted. We have been leveraging the Northern New England footprint, which has a lower cost to pass. As we discussed in the Q2 call, we are seeing some inflationary pressures in the form of equipment surcharges and increased contract labor. We estimate our average cost per passing to now be in the $600 to $650 range. This is still significantly below our peer group due to our close fiber network proximity to end customers in our markets.

Now I’ll review revenue by customer channel. Turning to our consumer channel, total revenue was $119.6 million, down 4.6% compared to a year ago. Normalizing for the impact of the sale of our Ohio assets, revenue declined 3.4% year over year. Overall, consumer broadband revenue was $69.6 million, up 1.5%. Consumer fiber net adds were up 3 times from a year ago based on the excitement around the Fidium brand, our superior product and the enhanced customer experience compared to any other product in the market.

Consumer fiber revenue was $21.6 million, up $6.1 million or 40% year over year and we have added over 12,000 consumer in fiber gig plus connections during the quarter. For the second consecutive quarter, we delivered total company consumer net positive broadband adds. Consumer fiber revenue, ARPU was $65.61 in the quarter, up $00.66 sequentially, driven by speed mix as customers continue to take higher speeds of our fiber services. The fiber speed mix of [indiscernible] gig plus is up 17 percentage points on a year over year basis. Approximately 80% of our customers are new to [CCI] (ph) and over 70% of our new fiber subscribers are taking 1-gig or higher product.

Consumer voice revenue was down $4.1 million, primarily due to the continued erosion of access lines and associated services. Video revenue declined $2.6 million or 16.2% year over year as we continue to deemphasize our linear video. We are accelerating our efforts to transition customers to streaming and over the top video services that will drive higher speed broadband adoption. This is also driving a reduction in video programming cost of $2.4 million year-over-year improving margins and free cash flow.

Commercial revenue was $102.2 million, down $4 million or 3.8%. Data services revenue was $56.8 million in the third quarter, down 1.3% year-over-year, primarily driven by the loss of a large customer, combined some delayed decision making by customers and prospects. Despite these challenges, our team has seen an increase in larger sales, including multi-site product solutions utilizing our advanced services portfolios of products and we are encouraged by the new sales trajectory. Additionally, the commercial team will benefit from increased market opportunities with our fiber expansion and new products for the SMB market, including Fidium at work. We expect the return to data services growth in 2023.

Voice services were down $3 million in the recent quarter, primarily driven by access lines declined, lower long distance and the migration of our customers to WIP solutions, which we include in data revenue.

Carrier revenue was $38 million, essentially flat from a year ago. Data and transport service revenue was $33.9 million, up 1%. As discussed on prior calls, our fiber to the tower business is under pricing pressure due to contract renewal negotiations with the major wireless providers. Our Q3 revenue benefited by the delayed timing of new pricing on our wireless backhaul contracts. As a result of the ongoing negotiations, our carrier team is pursuing new capacity upgrades for our wireless and wholesale customers and we have the opportunity to add new towers and pursue other business with the major carriers.

As discussed on previous calls, with respect to the fiber to the tower contracts, for full year 2022, including the effect of churn and pricing step downs, we had expected to see revenue reductions in the range of $10 million to $12 million. In our original view, these will be spread ratably over the year, based primarily on the timing of finalizing some of these contracts. Through Q3 we have recognized approximately $3 million today and we expect to recognize another $3 million or $4 million in Q4. For 2022, the total impact is now estimated to be between $6 million to $7 million. We still expect the run rate impact for ’23 to be in the range of $10 million to 12 million.

Wireless tower sites under contract now total almost 4,200, up 12% year-over-year. Our team continues to leverage our core network upgrades to provide a path to 10 gig backhaul capabilities at the tower site for carriers. Network access revenues totaled $27.3 million, down $2.6 million year over year, primarily due to the clients and special access circuit revenue as carriers move from TDM to Ethernet based transport solutions. Cost of services and products expense declined $1.3 million due to savings from video programming costs, offset by slightly higher utility and fuel expense. On a year-to-date basis, declines in video programming costs have outpaced the decline in revenue, improving EBITDA by over $2 million.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $8.7 million, primarily due to higher marketing costs related to our customer fiber product expansion, coupled with the non-recurrence of certain property tax rebates in the third quarter of 2021. Net interest expense was $32.1 million, a decrease of $11.1 million compared to a year ago, primarily as a result of a noncash interest of $10.9 million on the Search Light Note, which was converted to perpetual preferred stock last December.

The pending sale of our Kansas City assets, which we announced in March is expected to close by year end following routine regulatory approvals. It is currently under review with the FCC Team Telecom. During the quarter we recognized $5.2 million noncash impairment charge associated with an increase in the carrying value of the assets held for sale and increases in our estimated closing costs. We estimate this asset has annual revenue of approximately $45 million and adjusted EBITDA of approximately $12 million to $14 million for 2022. This asset sale is estimated to generate gross proceeds of approximately $90 million.

In the third quarter, we realized a gain on the cash proceeds from the sale of certain non-strategic communication towers and related equipment, totaling $19.2 million. To date, in 2022, we have announced over $600 million in aggregate cash proceeds from the divestitures of certain non-core assets. We continue to review all markets in our portfolio for investment or monetization. We believe we have the ability to source additional capital through potential asset divestitures. Our criteria in this review includes, evaluating the economics of the fiber build opportunities, market-level competition and potential valuations.

Moving to our debt, approximately 77% of our total debt is fixed. Recall, that we have a $500 million interest rate hedge against $1 billion term loan and $1.1 billion of senior notes with fixed coupons. Notwithstanding the heightened interest rate environment, our overall cost of debt is 6.2%, up nominally from 5.86% in the prior quarter. Our net debt leverage was 3.82 times at September 30 and our liquidity is $686 million with cash on hand of $462 million and available revolver capacity of $224 million. Additionally, on slide 13, we provided a pro forma view of our liquidity of over $770 million, which includes the effect of the Kansas City asset sale.

Given our strong liquidity, coupled with no debt maturities until 2027, we are well-positioned to continue executing on our fiber expansion plan. Today, we are reaffirming our 2022 guidance which is outlined on slide 14. We will provide 2023 guidance on our Q4 call in February. As we consider 2023, we’ve outlined the impact of divestitures in the fiber to the tower contract negotiations. However, we expect growth in consumer broadband on the heels of the positive momentum of our Fibre Gig+ product offering. We believe this will contribute to an inflection point in our overall revenues and we expect to see sequential revenue growth in the second half of the year.

I’ll now turn the call back over to Bob.

Bob Udell

Thank you, Steve. In closing, I’ll reiterate Consolidated’s fiber transformation is well underway. We are executing well on our consumer fiber expansion plan, having achieved another record quarter of fiber subscribers and net positive broadband connections. We’re enhancing the customer experience across all channels, and we’re excited to launch a bigger network early next year. We’re disciplined and focused on ensuring we have the capital structure to support our growth plan. We’ve simplified our strategy and significantly improved our liquidity. We are well positioned to continue executing on our plan, bringing the fantastic benefits of Fidium fiber broadband to more communities, creating long-term value for our shareholders.

Operator, we will now take questions at this time.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And your first question is from the line of Greg Williams with Cowen. Please go ahead.

Greg Williams

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Just wanted to talk about the cost to build, it sounds like you’re increasing it a little bit to $600 to $650. What are the components of this rising cost? I assume it’s mostly labor. I know, earlier in the year, Bob, you spoke about that the cost of resin going up, et cetera. I’m just wondering if you can parse that out.

Second question is a little more philosophical. What is the IRR or returns on your fiber builds today with these rising costs? And what I’m thinking about is, if it’s in the low to mid-teens for return and where your bonds are trading, I think, it’s in the low to mid-teens, do you think about buying back your debt in the public markets as we think [Technical Difficulty] shareholder value, et cetera? I’m just wondering if that is factored into your calculus. Thanks.

Bob Udell

Thanks, Greg. And I take the cost to pass first. And first of all, I would say, I want to remind you that proximity we have of our network, fiber deep is going to position us versus our competitors and others in the industry, even to have a very competitive low-cost to pass. And that includes the percent of aerial plan. So yes, while we see some increase in the cost, it is primarily labor and some of the subcontractors from a labor and especially equipment, getting diamond blades for different frictional boring in some rock areas. And so, it’s wallets of bump. I don’t think it’s significant, comparatively speaking. And we don’t think it gives us some — the whole scheme of our returns at this stage had significant impact. Go ahead, Steve.

Steve Childers

Yeah. Hey, Greg. I’ll take the second part of your question, on kind of the IRRs, Bob was talking about. I think, as — the unit economics as we rolled out the fiber plan, we were expecting kind of high-teen, low 20% IRR, again with the — for your question with the cost of passings going up modestly, which is still really strong competitive advantage compared to anybody else that we’re competing for capital for or equity holdings for. That’s one thing.

But then to your question, your — just to your question for trading IRR on the build versus potentially buying back bonds, we believe — we know where our bonds are trading at. And again, maybe in a different environment we might be thinking about that, but we’re so committed to driving long-term shareholder value and significant cash flows with the opportunity that we have on the build plan that we’re fully committed to investing every dollar of free cash flow we have into the build plan over time, that’s where we think five years from now, that’s where we’re going to get the most value from versus buying back bonds today at a discount.

Greg Williams

Got it. Makes sense. Thank you.

Bob Udell

Next question.

Operator

Your next question is from the line of Michael Rollins with Citi. Please go ahead.

Bob Udell

Hi, Mike. Good morning.

Michael Rollins

Hi, good morning. Just two questions. First, I was curious looking at some of the KPIs, the DSL losses were a little higher. Are you seeing that as a function of just migration to your fiber service? Or is there some kind of change in just the competitive climate for your copper subscriptions?

And then secondly, you mentioned — I’m sorry.

Bob Udell

No, go ahead.

Michael Rollins

I was going to say for the second question, I was just curious, if you could size in some way the potential to further optimize your footprint per the comments during the prepared commentary. Thanks.

Bob Udell

Yeah. Let me take the first question, and then I may ask [indiscernible] the second. With regards to DSL losses, it’s really two things. We lose DSL through our focus on converting them and transitioning them as we do fiber upgrades and we’re putting a lot more attention on the DSL customer base going forward and studying that. And so, we’re getting more aggressive in letting them know our build schedule as we map that out more concretely for future years. And so, we think we’re going to have some greater impact on that going forward.

But third quarter is typically a higher move season and while it’s somewhat muted, that is where we see more DSL churn because of the speed, competitive nature where we have a good footprint of 100 [meg] (ph). It’s still in the lower speed areas where more at risk and that’s why we’re working more aggressively to get those areas passed and let them know that we’re coming in the near-term future. But in the new season, that takes a little bit more of a tick.

And the second question, looking at the — I think you’re referring to divestitures. Is that right?

Michael Rollins

Yes. You mentioned earlier in the discussion that you are continuing to consider optimization and I was just curious if there’s a way to size that, whether it’s in the footprint size or the dollar potential or the EBITDA potential, just some way of thinking about what the total potential of that opportunity looks like?

Bob Udell

Yeah, got it. And so, as we said in the past, there is a roughly, we think, $200 million of assets over time that we would still consider as a divestiture opportunity. Having said that, we’re in conversations always with some parties that have interest and yet nothing active to the point where we could announce it. And so, we’re going to continue to work through those things that we’ve announced and optimize the ones that we haven’t with the public-private partnership opportunities we have. Having the regional diversity that we have, we have a number of bites at the apple on all the state programs that are at different stages of evolution. Somebody wish we would move faster than others. So, I think we’ve got upside to increase their value over time and in the meantime, we’ve talked to folks that have interest and explore opportunities, but nothing to announce or add at this time. Thanks for the questions.

Michael Rollins

Thanks.

Bob Udell

Thanks.

Operator

Your next question is from the line of Jason Kim with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Jason Kim

Great. Thank you very much. A couple of questions from me. I know it’s still early, but any thoughts on how next year’s CapEx may look like? And your net leverage ratio declined this quarter given the asset sale proceeds. And looking ahead, how should we think about the peak net leverage for the company as you complete your fiber investments?

Steve Childers

Hey, Jason, this is Steve. So thanks for the question. I think on CapEx, I mean, as you said, we are not giving guidance today. But I think you probably think that we’re still going to be in the $500 million plus range. We’re still — the kind of the current pace of the build is under consideration and that’s really what we’re focused on. So, I think with the — to your point on kind — I’ll kind of combine this — your question, but today with the benefit that we had from the Verizon asset sale, the $490 million in proceeds in the bank today that obviously did really impact leverage the positive side for right now. But we are, I mean, to your point, we will based on the size of the CapEx envelope versus kind of a lag on the sales penetration of ramp up, we will probably have a negative cash burn rate for this year and ’23.

So, I think — said differently, if it hadn’t been for the Verizon sale as we had mentioned early in the year, we would probably be kind of like approaching 5 times or maybe like 5.5 times for kind of peak leverage for the bill that still kind of where we’re thinking at subject to how we perform on the business, how we can grow EBITDA faster going into ’23, ’24. And as Bob mentioned about the opportunity for additional subsidies grants to help offset additional cost to build costs going forward.

Jason Kim

Great, that’s helpful. And then as for the broadband stimulus funding, what do you expect Consolidated’s share of the cost to be on a per-home basis to the extent to which you win this funding?

Steve Childers

Yeah. I’m not going to disclose the specific offset on a cost per pass, but what I — because it varies from project to project. But what I can say is, when we look at it, our model, it conservatively on the high side can withstand higher than what our average cost per passing is now. And so what we’re going to do is, build — use the public-private partnership, be the ARPA and NKA brands in some state capital project grants that we’ve been involved with, in some cases won already to supplement our cost per passing so that we stay in the $600 — $500 to $700 range really. And so that’s why we look at the projects.

It extends our opportunity to build further into the rural areas and we can usually do it at a lower cost if we time our projects correctly. And so, that’s what you’ll see us do as this process unfolds and it’s a bit unpredictable, we’re in one now where we’re delayed seven, eight months because of NTIA administrative processing and that ends up longer if we get pushed into winter construction months. So we’re really going to keep flexibility and we are in a perfect cash position to do that, we can optimize every dollar we can get access to across our markets and so we feel really well positioned to maximize those opportunities.

Jason Kim

Understood. Thanks very much.

Operator

[Operator Instructions]Your next question is from the line of Stephen Sikora with Aetna. Please go ahead.

Bob Udell

Hi, Stephen.

Stephen Sikora

Hey, guys. Got a couple of questions here. So the first one, a follow-up on the DSL question. Are you seeing any impact at all from either cable getting more aggressive trying to win those copper subs, fixed wireless competition, or just general economic weakness hurting those specific customers?

And then second, if I look back at the Q2 presentation, you guys outlined a 400,000 fiber homepage in ’22 and ’23, 300,000 in 2024, and 250,000 in 2025. In the 3Q presentation, it’s 1 billion passings from 2023 to 2025 and it looks like you’ll beat that original 400,000 guidance for 2022. So is that an indication along with your current build pace that you might accelerate bills versus your original plans? And if so, what kind of variables go into that decision? Thanks.

Bob Udell

Thanks, Stephen. That’s a bit of lot packed in there. So let me start with the DSL piece. We really see DSL losses from three major places and two that are the largest. One is moves and then replacement with a more competitive offer that would be coming from cable and in some very limited cases, maybe fixed wireless. We’re not seeing a lot on the economic front, which we watch closely, and as we look at that phase, it’s driving some of the priority where we build. And so, I think it’s — for us, it’s probably more cable competition, not a lot of aggressive promos necessarily across the DSL base that we have, because it’s more distributed in rural, but I would say that that’s probably still the larger factor.

And then on the economic side, I can’t see that right yet being a factor. I do think there’ll be some headwinds from an economic perspective, but we also believe broadband is a very resilient product in tougher economic rough times where everyone needs connectivity, especially in the more distributed work environment we live in. So if I had to prioritize, I’d say, there is pressure from cable in that space.

Regarding the 400,000 this year and the 1 million over the next few years, I think we’re intentional in saying we’ve got flexibility. And so, we’re going to use, as I mentioned earlier, these public-private partnerships to help us prioritize, getting every dollar possible, because it just extends our reach and we’re best positioned to win those from a cost per passing perspective, when it’s a competitive RFP process. And so, the timing of those can drive, for example, 4 times, 5 times the number of passings that you’re being funded for in order to optimize when the crews are in place and to build the complete market at one time.

And so, we think with the economy slowing down, tougher access to capital for some being in in liquidity position that we’re in gives us the best flexibility to pace the build where we think we can get the best return, and not only penetrate the market faster as we ramp our — continue to ramp our sales acquisition strategy, but also do it in a way we can maximize supplementary funds to build more rural passings.

Stephen Sikora

Great, thank you.

Operator

Your next question is from the line of Ana Goshko with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Bob Udell

Hi, Ana. Good morning.

Ana Goshko

Hi, thanks very much. I wanted to ask you on the commercial side. So you referenced the large customer churn. I just wondered about the circumstances of that. Was that a competitive loss? And if so, what were the factors do you think that drove that? And I think you also mentioned delayed decision making on the part of some other customers. Is that economy based or what’s that based on?

Bob Udell

No. And let me take the first part of that. The large customer churn was a unique situation that really occurred based on that customer’s consortium, the daylight, and we were an underlying supplier for it. And so, for confidentiality reasons, I won’t go into details to say other things going on. But it was a contract that we thought we get renewals for and it wasn’t possible. So it’s a really unique situation.

On the delayed decision-making, I would say that’s more of a general market cautiousness that we’re seeing grow, and I think it may have something to do with election season. It also may have, we believe, a factor associated with the belief that a recession is coming and higher interest rates for folks that use leverage capital to make equipment purchases that align with network from grooming and builds that we support.

So the pipeline remains solid. It’s just things have gotten a little more pushed and so we’re being cautious, but yet optimistic that both we will be able to offset the large customer that churned and see growth in commercial data. We’ve typically been a leader in this space and our ability to acquire more than our fair share and I expect with more fiber that we’ve deployed, we’re going to have more opportunity.

Ana Goshko

So what is the revenue or EBITDA impact of that customers, is it material to the overall results?

Steve Childers

It’s not material to the overall results.

Ana Goshko

Okay. And then secondly, I know there’s quite a bit of discussion on cost to pass. On cost to connect, a variable cost, the success based cost that you incur when you’re adding the fiber subs. How has that been trending?

Bob Udell

Yes, it’s actually been trending close to flat, if maybe not a little bit down and I think that might be temporary. But we’ve been able to improve our drop — the connection between the pedestal or the pole to the customer. We’ve been able to improve that process and reduce cost substantially. We’ve been experimenting with different approaches to it and we’ll continue to work on that. We paid some expedite charges to get WiFi 6 out and test our mesh WiFi experience, which has had a positive impact on NPS scores. So we’re going to continue to see that oscillate for inflationary reasons, as well as our refinement in process, but I don’t see it materially changing going forward other than maybe long term to track with industry technology costs. But the technology is actually going to get cheaper as we continue to provide more volume. And I think that may be countered by inflation with some labor cost increases.

Ana Goshko

Okay. So just as a reminder, what is that per gross add now?

Bob Udell

It’s roughly 700.

Ana Goshko

Got it. Okay. Well, great. Thank you very much.

Bob Udell

Thank you, Ana. Next question operator?

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And there are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back over to Bob Udell for any closing remarks.

Bob Udell

Thanks, Dennis. And thank you all for joining the call today. We appreciate you tuning in and your support for our long term vision and our evolution to becoming a fiber focused broadband company. Look forward to updating you on our next call. Have a great day.

Operator

This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*